Suppr超能文献

中药外敷联合中药熏蒸治疗急性附睾炎的临床观察

[Traditional Chinese medicinal compress combined with herbal fumigation for acute epididymitis: A clinical observation].

作者信息

Zhao Xin, Yu Yu, Li Ao-Mei, Shang Wei

机构信息

Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, General Hospital of Eastern Theater Command, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210002, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2024 Jul;30(7):648-652.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To observe the clinical efficacy of traditional Chinese medicinal (TCM) compress combined with herbal fumigation in the treatment of acute epididymitis.

METHODS

This study included 74 cases of acute epididymitis treated in our hospital from December 2021 to December 2023. Using the single blind and random number methods, we divided the patients into a trial (n = 37) and a control group (n = 37). On the basis of routine medication with antibiotics, we treated the patients in the trial group by TCM compress combined with herbal fumigation and those in the control group by dyed pure water compress combined with herbal fumigation. At 3, 7 and 14 days of treatment, we obtained the pain scores and maximum epididymal diameters from the patients and compared them between the two groups before and after treatment.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences between the control and trial groups in the baseline pain scores (6.79 vs 6.85, P>0.05) and maximum epididymal diameters of the patients ([1.61 ± 0.39] vs [1.59 ± 0.42] cm, P>0.05) or in the pain scores after 3 days of treatment (4.63 ± 0.95 vs 4.45 ± 1.87, P>0.05). Compared with the controls, the patients of the trial group showed significantly lower pain scores (3.78 ±1.03 vs 1.02±0.36, P<0.05) and a higher overall effectiveness rate (75.68% vs 91.89%, P<0.05) at 7 days, and markedly shorter maximum epididymal diameters at 3 days ([1.45 ± 0.38] vs [1.23 ± 0.72] cm, P<0.05) and 7 days ([1.21 ± 0.29] vs [0.98 ± 0.15] cm, P<0.05). No statistically significant differences were observed between the control and trial groups in the pain scores (0.79 ± 1.12 vs 0.67 ± 0.86, P>0.05), maximum epididymal diameters ([0.94 ± 0.33] vs [0.92 ± 0.21] cm, P>0.05) or overall effectiveness rate (91.89% vs 97.30%, P>0.05) after 14 days of treatment.

CONCLUSION

On the basis of routine medication with antibiotics, TCM compress combined with herbal fumigation can effectively relieve pain, reduce local swelling, accelerate recovery and shorten the course of treatment in patients with acute epididymitis, and is therefore worthy of clinical promotion and application.

摘要

目的

观察中药外敷联合中药熏蒸治疗急性附睾炎的临床疗效。

方法

本研究纳入2021年12月至2023年12月在我院治疗的74例急性附睾炎患者。采用单盲和随机数字法将患者分为试验组(n = 37)和对照组(n = 37)。在使用抗生素常规用药的基础上,试验组患者采用中药外敷联合中药熏蒸治疗,对照组患者采用染色纯水外敷联合中药熏蒸治疗。在治疗第3、7和14天,获取患者的疼痛评分和附睾最大直径,并比较两组治疗前后的情况。

结果

对照组和试验组患者的基线疼痛评分(6.79 vs 6.85,P>0.05)、附睾最大直径([1.61±0.39] vs [1.59±0.42]cm,P>0.05)以及治疗3天后的疼痛评分(4.63±0.95 vs 4.45±1.87,P>0.05)差异均无统计学意义。与对照组相比,试验组患者在治疗7天时疼痛评分显著更低(3.78±1.03 vs 1.02±0.36,P<0.05),总有效率更高(75.68% vs 91.89%,P<0.05),且在治疗3天([1.45±0.38] vs [1.23±0.72]cm,P<0.05)和7天([1.21±0.29] vs [0.98±0.15]cm,P<0.05)时附睾最大直径明显更短。治疗14天后,对照组和试验组在疼痛评分(0.79±1.12 vs

相似文献

4
[Clinical study of Chinese Medicine fumigation combined with "Zhuyuan Decoction" in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis].
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Jan;34(1):5-9. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2020.01.002.
7

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验