• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前交叉韧带重建术后胫骨近端形态继发同侧损伤的风险因素分析:一项回顾性横断面研究。

Risk-factor analysis of the proximal tibia morphology for secondary ipsilateral injury after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A retrospective cross-sectional study.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Fengfeng General Hospital of North China Medical & Health Group, Handan, Hebei, PR China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Aug 30;103(35):e39395. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000039395.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000039395
PMID:39213253
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11365653/
Abstract

Many studies have reported the risk factors associated with primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. However, few studies have focused on the bony morphology of secondary ipsilateral injury after ACL reconstruction. This study aimed to investigate the morphological risk factors of the proximal tibia contributing to secondary ipsilateral injury after ACL reconstruction. Twenty patients who were selected from secondary ipsilateral injury after ACL reconstruction between January 2015 and May 2020 were included in the secondary injury group. They were matched in a 1:2 ratio to the control group, which underwent primary ACL reconstruction during the same period and did not experience reinjury at the minimum 2-year follow-up, based on age, gender, and body mass index. All parameters, including medial tibial posterior slope, lateral tibial posterior slope (LTPS), medial tibial plateau depth, and lateral tibial plateau height, were recorded by using magnetic resonance imaging. Binary logistic regression analysis and receiver operator characteristic curves were conducted to explore the risk factors for reinjury and determine the cutoff value for the significant parameter. The LTPS was significantly larger in the secondary injury group than in the control group (9.6 ± 1.5° to 7.0 ± 1.4°, P < .001), and there was no significant difference in the medial tibial posterior slope, medial tibial posterior slope, and lateral tibial plateau height between the 2 groups (P > .05). The LTPS was found to be an independent risk factor for secondary ipsilateral injury after ACL reconstruction (odds ratio = 3.220, 95% confidence interval = 1.904-5.446, P < .001). The cutoff value of the LTPS was 8.8°, with a sensitivity of 91.7% and a specificity of 81.2%. The LTPS could be a unique predictor of secondary ipsilateral injury after ACL reconstruction. Orthopedists should implement effective measurements during primary reconstruction when the LTPS is >8.8°.

摘要

许多研究报告了与原发性前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤相关的风险因素。然而,很少有研究关注 ACL 重建后同侧二次损伤的骨形态学。本研究旨在探讨 ACL 重建后同侧二次损伤的胫骨近端形态学危险因素。

将 2015 年 1 月至 2020 年 5 月期间因 ACL 重建后同侧二次损伤而入选的患者纳入二次损伤组,根据年龄、性别和体重指数,将其与同期行初次 ACL 重建且至少 2 年随访未再受伤的患者以 1:2 的比例匹配到对照组。

使用磁共振成像记录内侧胫骨后倾角、外侧胫骨后倾角(LTPS)、内侧胫骨平台深度和外侧胫骨平台高度等参数。采用二元逻辑回归分析和受试者工作特征曲线探讨再损伤的危险因素,并确定有统计学意义的参数的截断值。

二次损伤组的 LTPS 明显大于对照组(9.6±1.5°比 7.0±1.4°,P<0.001),两组间内侧胫骨后倾角、内侧胫骨平台深度和外侧胫骨平台高度无显著差异(P>.05)。

LTPS 是 ACL 重建后同侧二次损伤的独立危险因素(比值比=3.220,95%置信区间=1.904-5.446,P<0.001)。LTPS 的截断值为 8.8°,其灵敏度为 91.7%,特异性为 81.2%。

LTPS 可能是 ACL 重建后同侧二次损伤的独特预测指标。当 LTPS>8.8°时,骨科医生应在初次重建时采取有效措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5aa8/11365653/60c72eb17ce3/medi-103-e39395-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5aa8/11365653/c8bb407e6951/medi-103-e39395-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5aa8/11365653/272a7da1b610/medi-103-e39395-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5aa8/11365653/f441cb6dd11a/medi-103-e39395-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5aa8/11365653/60c72eb17ce3/medi-103-e39395-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5aa8/11365653/c8bb407e6951/medi-103-e39395-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5aa8/11365653/272a7da1b610/medi-103-e39395-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5aa8/11365653/f441cb6dd11a/medi-103-e39395-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5aa8/11365653/60c72eb17ce3/medi-103-e39395-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk-factor analysis of the proximal tibia morphology for secondary ipsilateral injury after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A retrospective cross-sectional study.前交叉韧带重建术后胫骨近端形态继发同侧损伤的风险因素分析:一项回顾性横断面研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Aug 30;103(35):e39395. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000039395.
2
Lateral Tibial Posterior Slope Is Increased in Patients With Early Graft Failure After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.前交叉韧带重建术后早期移植物失败患者的胫骨后外侧斜率增加。
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Oct;43(10):2510-4. doi: 10.1177/0363546515597664. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
3
Variations in Knee Kinematics After ACL Injury and After Reconstruction Are Correlated With Bone Shape Differences.前交叉韧带损伤及重建后膝关节运动学的变化与骨形态差异相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Oct;475(10):2427-2435. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5368-8.
4
Lateral Meniscus Height and ACL Reconstruction Failure: A Nested Case-Control Study.外侧半月板高度与 ACL 重建失败:巢式病例对照研究。
J Knee Surg. 2022 Aug;35(10):1138-1146. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1722323. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
5
Increased medial and lateral tibial posterior slopes are independent risk factors for graft failure following ACL reconstruction.胫骨后内侧和外侧坡度增加是前交叉韧带重建术后移植物失败的独立危险因素。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018 Oct;138(10):1423-1431. doi: 10.1007/s00402-018-2968-z. Epub 2018 May 28.
6
Patients With Failed Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Have an Increased Posterior Lateral Tibial Plateau Slope: A Case-Controlled Study.前交叉韧带重建失败患者的胫骨后外侧平台斜率增加:一项病例对照研究。
Arthroscopy. 2019 Apr;35(4):1172-1182. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.11.049. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
7
Higher risk of contralateral anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury within 2 years after ACL reconstruction in under-18-year-old patients with steep tibial plateau slope.18 岁以下胫骨平台倾斜度陡的患者前交叉韧带(ACL)重建后 2 年内对侧 ACL 损伤风险增加。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Jun;29(6):1690-1700. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06195-y. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
8
Steep Posterior Tibial Slope, Anterior Tibial Subluxation, Deep Posterior Lateral Femoral Condyle, and Meniscal Deficiency Are Common Findings in Multiple Anterior Cruciate Ligament Failures: An MRI Case-Control Study.后胫骨斜率陡峭、胫骨前脱位、股骨外髁后深、半月板缺失是多发前交叉韧带断裂的常见表现:一项 MRI 病例对照研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Feb;47(2):285-295. doi: 10.1177/0363546518823544. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
9
The Association Between Tibial Slope and Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Patients ≤21 Years Old: A Matched Case-Control Study Including 317 Revisions.≤21 岁患者胫骨倾斜度与前交叉韧带重建翻修的相关性:一项包括 317 例翻修手术的匹配病例对照研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2019 Dec;47(14):3330-3338. doi: 10.1177/0363546519878436. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
10
Single-bundle ACL combined with ALL reconstruction yields comparable outcomes in patients with varied anatomical risk factors for ACL graft failure.单束 ACL 结合 ALL 重建在 ACL 移植物失败的解剖风险因素各异的患者中产生可比的结果。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Aug 6;25(1):625. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07725-2.