Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, 545 Barnhill Dr, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2024 Oct;38(10):6097-6104. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11205-y. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
Improvements in bariatric surgery outcomes have prompted policy initiatives that explore shifting bariatric surgery toward outpatient procedures. While the safety of early discharge after primary laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) has been reported, its safety for revisional LRYGB remains uncertain. Our study aimed to investigate the safety and patient factors associated with early discharge in patients undergoing revisional LRYGB compared with primary LRYGB.
We identified adult patients who underwent primary and revisional LRYGB from 2020 to 2022 in the MBSAQIP database. Patients discharged early, i.e., same-day discharge (SDD) and next-day discharge (NDD) were compared to inpatients. Outcomes included 30-day complications (minor = Clavien-Dindo 1-2; major = Clavien-Dindo 3-4), mortality, readmissions, and reoperations. Multivariable logistic regression models adjusting for patient demographics, comorbidities, and operative time were fitted to assess the study outcomes.
SDD rate was similar after primary (3,422/137,406; 2.5%) and revisional LRYGB (781/32,721; 2.4%), while NDD rate was higher in primary LRYGB (59.8% vs 54.7%, respectively; p < 0.001). SDD patients had lower odds of major complications compared to inpatients following primary (2% vs 7%, aOR: 0.30, 95%CI 0.24-0.38) and revisional LRYGB (3.7% vs 9.3%, aOR: 0.43, 95%CI 0.29-0.62, respectively). NDD patients had similarly lower odds of morbidity outcomes. ASA Classification IV/V was associated with lower odds of SDD compared to Class I/II (Primary: 0.9% vs. 3%, aOR: 0.61, 95% CI 0.48-0.78; Revisions: 0.9% vs. 3%, aOR: 0.24, 95%CI 0.10-0.55).
Early discharge after revisional LRYGB, particularly after an overnight stay, can be accomplished safely in carefully selected patients. However, SDD rates remain low limiting its safety assessment. Further, almost half of the patients stay more than 48 h in the hospital suggesting that policy initiatives toward outpatient management after bariatric surgery may be inappropriate for this patient population.
减重手术效果的改善促使政策制定者探索将减重手术转向门诊手术。虽然腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术(LRYGB)初次手术后早期出院的安全性已有报道,但修订后的 LRYGB 早期出院的安全性仍不确定。我们的研究旨在调查与初次 LRYGB 相比,修订后的 LRYGB 中与早期出院相关的安全性和患者因素。
我们从 MBSAQIP 数据库中确定了 2020 年至 2022 年期间接受初次和修订 LRYGB 的成年患者。与住院患者相比,我们比较了早期出院(即当天出院(SDD)和次日出院(NDD))的患者。结果包括 30 天并发症(轻微并发症=Clavien-Dindo 1-2;主要并发症=Clavien-Dindo 3-4)、死亡率、再入院和再次手术。使用多变量逻辑回归模型调整患者人口统计学、合并症和手术时间,以评估研究结果。
初次和修订 LRYGB 的 SDD 率相似(分别为 3422/137406,2.5%和 781/32721,2.4%),而初次 LRYGB 的 NDD 率更高(分别为 59.8%和 54.7%,p<0.001)。与住院患者相比,SDD 患者初次(2%与 7%,比值比:0.30,95%CI 0.24-0.38)和修订 LRYGB(3.7%与 9.3%,比值比:0.43,95%CI 0.29-0.62)的主要并发症发生率较低。NDD 患者的发病率结果也较低。ASA 分类 IV/V 与 I/II 类(初次:0.9%与 3%,比值比:0.61,95%CI 0.48-0.78;修订:0.9%与 3%,比值比:0.24,95%CI 0.10-0.55)相比,SDD 的可能性较低。
在仔细选择的患者中,修订后的 LRYGB 后,特别是过夜后,早期出院是安全的。然而,SDD 率仍然较低,限制了其安全性评估。此外,几乎一半的患者在医院停留超过 48 小时,这表明减重手术后向门诊管理的政策举措可能不适合这部分患者人群。