Fabritz Larissa, Al-Taie Christoph, Borof Katrin, Breithardt Günter, Camm A John, Crijns Harry J G M, Roth Cardoso Victor, Chua Winnie, van Elferen Silke, Eckardt Lars, Gkoutos Georgios, Goette Andreas, Guasch Eduard, Hatem Stéphane, Metzner Andreas, Mont Lluís, Murukutla Vaishnavi Ameya, Obergassel Julius, Rillig Andreas, Sinner Moritz F, Schnabel Renate B, Schotten Ulrich, Sommerfeld Laura C, Wienhues-Thelen Ursula-Henrike, Zapf Antonia, Zeller Tanja, Kirchhof Paulus
University Center of Cardiovascular Science, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Department of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, Hamburg 20246, Germany.
Eur Heart J. 2024 Dec 16;45(47):5002-5019. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae611.
In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), recurrent AF and sinus rhythm during follow-up are determined by interactions between cardiovascular disease processes and rhythm control therapy. Predictors of attaining sinus rhythm at follow-up are not well known.
To quantify the interaction between cardiovascular disease processes and rhythm outcomes, 14 biomarkers reflecting AF-related cardiovascular disease processes in 1586 patients in the EAST-AFNET 4 biomolecule study (71 years old, 45% women) were quantified at baseline. Mixed logistic regression models including clinical features were constructed for each biomarker. Biomarkers were interrogated for interaction with early rhythm control. Outcome was sinus rhythm at 12 months. Results were validated at 24 months and in external datasets.
Higher baseline concentrations of three biomarkers were independently associated with a lower chance of sinus rhythm at 12 months: angiopoietin 2 (ANGPT2) (odds ratio [OR] .76 [95% confidence interval .65-.89], P < .001), bone morphogenetic protein 10 (BMP10) (OR .83 [.71-.97], P = .017), and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) (OR .73 [.60-.88], P < .001). Analysis of rhythm at 24 months confirmed the results. Early rhythm control interacted with the predictive potential of NT-proBNP (Pinteraction = .033). The predictive effect of NT-proBNP was reduced in patients randomized to early rhythm control (usual care: OR .64 [.51-.80], P < .001; early rhythm control: OR .90 [.69-1.18], P = .453). External validation confirmed that low concentrations of ANGPT2, BMP10, and NT-proBNP predict sinus rhythm during follow-up.
Low concentrations of ANGPT2, BMP10, and NT-proBNP identify patients with AF who are likely to attain sinus rhythm during follow-up. The predictive ability of NT-proBNP is attenuated in patients receiving rhythm control.
在心房颤动(AF)患者中,随访期间房颤复发和窦性心律情况取决于心血管疾病进程与节律控制治疗之间的相互作用。随访时达到窦性心律的预测因素尚不明确。
为了量化心血管疾病进程与节律转归之间的相互作用,在EAST-AFNET 4生物分子研究中,对1586例患者(年龄71岁,45%为女性)基线时反映AF相关心血管疾病进程的14种生物标志物进行了量化。针对每种生物标志物构建了包含临床特征的混合逻辑回归模型。对生物标志物与早期节律控制之间的相互作用进行了研究。观察终点为12个月时的窦性心律。结果在24个月时以及外部数据集中进行了验证。
三种生物标志物的基线浓度较高与12个月时窦性心律的可能性较低独立相关:血管生成素2(ANGPT2)(比值比[OR].76[95%置信区间.65-.89],P<.001)、骨形态发生蛋白10(BMP10)(OR.83[.71-.97],P =.017)和N末端B型利钠肽原(NT-proBNP)(OR.73[.60-.88],P<.001)。对24个月时的节律分析证实了这些结果。早期节律控制与NT-proBNP的预测潜力存在相互作用(P相互作用 =.033)。在随机接受早期节律控制的患者中,NT-proBNP的预测作用减弱(常规治疗:OR.64[.51-.80],P<.001;早期节律控制:OR.90[.69-1.18],P =.453)。外部验证证实,ANGPT2、BMP10和NT-proBNP浓度低可预测随访期间的窦性心律。
ANGPT2、BMP10和NT-proBNP浓度低可识别出随访期间可能达到窦性心律的AF患者。在接受节律控制的患者中,NT-proBNP的预测能力减弱。