Suppr超能文献

BRAF V600E 突变且错配修复缺陷或微卫星不稳定高转移性结直肠癌患者在免疫检查点抑制剂后使用 BRAF+EGFR+/-MEK 抑制剂。

BRAF + EGFR +/- MEK inhibitors after immune checkpoint inhibitors in BRAF V600E mutated and deficient mismatch repair or microsatellite instability high metastatic colorectal cancer.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, European Georges Pompidou Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France; Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.

Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer. 2024 Oct;210:114290. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.114290. Epub 2024 Aug 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are the guideline endorsed first choice for patients with deficient mismatch repair or microsatellite instability high (dMMR/MSI-H) mCRC, however a significant proportion experience primary or secondary resistance. BRAF V600E mutated (BRAFm) and dMMR/MSI-H mCRC can be treated with BRAF + EGFR inhibitors but specific data on the efficacy after progression to ICIs are missing.

METHODS

We collected consecutive patients with BRAFm dMMR/MSI-H mCRC treated from 2017 to 2024 with a combination of BRAFi+EGFRi+/-MEKi, after disease progression on ICIs. A control cohort of BRAFm pMMR/MSS mCRC patients treated with encorafenib+cetuximab+/-binimetinib from 2nd line was used.

RESULTS

dMMR/MSI-H (n = 50) BRAFm mCRC patients were more often > 70-year-old, with right-sided primary tumors, without liver but more lymphnode metastases than pMMR/MSS (n = 170). They were treated more frequently beyond 2nd line and 45 % were primary progressors to ICIs. Lower ORR (18 % versus 32 %, p = 0.09) and DCR (60 % versus 73 %, p = 0.11) was seen without reaching significance in dMMR/MSI-H as compared to pMMR/MSS patients. After a median follow-up of 14.04 months, no differences in PFS (median 5.13 versus 4.50 months, HR 0.83, 95 %CI: 0.57-1.20, p = 0.31) and OS (median 10.75 versus 9.11 months, HR 0.89, 95 %CI: 0.59-1.32, p = 0.55) were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that BRAFm dMMR/MSI-H mCRC patients benefit from BRAFi+EGFRi+/-MEKi after progression under ICIs. Despite lower ORR and DCR, the outcome is not different from that observed in pMMR/MSS BRAFm CRC and is in line with the results of the BEACON registration trial.

摘要

背景

免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)是指南推荐的首选治疗方案,适用于错配修复缺陷或微卫星不稳定高(dMMR/MSI-H)结直肠癌患者,但相当一部分患者会出现原发性或继发性耐药。BRAF V600E 突变(BRAFm)和 dMMR/MSI-H 结直肠癌可以用 BRAF+EGFR 抑制剂治疗,但缺乏关于 ICI 进展后疗效的具体数据。

方法

我们收集了 2017 年至 2024 年期间连续接受 BRAFi+EGFRi+/-MEKi 联合治疗的 BRAFm dMMR/MSI-H 结直肠癌患者的资料,这些患者在 ICI 进展后出现疾病进展。我们还使用了第二个队列的 BRAFm pMMR/MSS 结直肠癌患者的数据,这些患者接受了 encorafenib+cetuximab+/-binimetinib 二线治疗。

结果

dMMR/MSI-H(n=50)BRAFm 结直肠癌患者的年龄大于 70 岁、右侧原发肿瘤、无肝转移但更多淋巴结转移的比例高于 pMMR/MSS(n=170)。他们更频繁地接受二线以上治疗,45%的患者为 ICI 的原发性进展者。dMMR/MSI-H 组的客观缓解率(18%与 32%,p=0.09)和疾病控制率(60%与 73%,p=0.11)较低,但未达到显著差异。中位随访 14.04 个月后,dMMR/MSI-H 组的无进展生存期(中位 5.13 个月与 4.50 个月,HR 0.83,95%CI:0.57-1.20,p=0.31)和总生存期(中位 10.75 个月与 9.11 个月,HR 0.89,95%CI:0.59-1.32,p=0.55)无差异。

结论

我们的结果表明,BRAFm dMMR/MSI-H 结直肠癌患者在 ICI 进展后接受 BRAFi+EGFRi+/-MEKi 治疗获益。尽管客观缓解率和疾病控制率较低,但结果与 pMMR/MSS BRAFm CRC 观察到的结果无差异,与 BEACON 注册试验的结果一致。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验