Boulouta A, Kyriazoglou A, Kotsantis I, Economopoulou P, Anastasiou M, Pantazopoulos A, Kyrkasiadou M, Moutafi M, Gavrielatou N, Zazas E, Caglar C, Nixon I, Tolia M, Kavourakis G, Psyrri A
Second Department of Internal Medicine, Oncology Unit, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Second Department of Internal Medicine, Oncology Unit, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Cancer Treat Rev. 2024 Nov;130:102820. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102820. Epub 2024 Aug 24.
Soft tissue sarcomas (STS), comprising approximately 1% of adult solid malignancies, are primarily treated with surgery, with the choice of perioperative treatment being a challenging and highly individualized decision. Clinical trials assessing neoadjuvant modalities in STS predominantly use clinical outcomes or radiologic response as endpoints, with pathologic complete response (pCR) not being employed as a designated study endpoint. Our systematic review aimed to assess the rates of pCR in clinical trials of different neoadjuvant modalities for STS and its correlation with patient clinical outcomes. 23 phase I, II and III studies were included, from which data regarding rates of pCR with each treatment, as well as correlation of pCR with clinical outcomes were retrieved. In 16 trials that assessed pCR, the percentage of patients who achieved a pCR ranged from 8 to 58%. Most of these trials did not aim to establish an association between pCR and clinical outcomes. However, among those that did investigate this correlation, a positive association was identified between pCR and both 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) and 5-year overall survival (OS). While pCR serves as a crucial marker guiding treatment decisions in other neoplasms like triple negative breast cancer and urothelial cancer, it is not yet used in a similar setting for STS. Our findings indicate variability in patients achieving pCR across different neoadjuvant treatments for STS and a possible positive correlation with patient outcomes. Consequently, we propose considering pCR as a surrogate endpoint in future prospective trials for STS.
软组织肉瘤(STS)约占成人实体恶性肿瘤的1%,主要通过手术治疗,围手术期治疗的选择是一个具有挑战性且高度个体化的决定。评估STS新辅助治疗方式的临床试验主要将临床结果或影像学反应作为终点,病理完全缓解(pCR)未被用作指定的研究终点。我们的系统评价旨在评估不同新辅助治疗方式用于STS的临床试验中的pCR率及其与患者临床结果的相关性。纳入了23项I期、II期和III期研究,从中检索了每种治疗的pCR率以及pCR与临床结果的相关性数据。在16项评估pCR的试验中,达到pCR的患者百分比在8%至58%之间。这些试验大多并非旨在确定pCR与临床结果之间的关联。然而,在那些确实研究了这种相关性的试验中,发现pCR与5年疾病特异性生存率(DSS)和5年总生存率(OS)均呈正相关。虽然pCR在三阴性乳腺癌和尿路上皮癌等其他肿瘤中是指导治疗决策的关键标志物,但在STS的类似情况下尚未使用。我们的研究结果表明,不同新辅助治疗的STS患者达到pCR的情况存在差异,且可能与患者预后呈正相关。因此,我们建议在未来针对STS的前瞻性试验中考虑将pCR作为替代终点。