Interdisciplinary Research Center for Biology and Chemistry, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian, 116029, China; Laboratory of Molecular Modeling and Design, State Key Laboratory of Molecular Reaction Dynamics, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian, 116023, China.
Interdisciplinary Research Center for Biology and Chemistry, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian, 116029, China; Laboratory of Molecular Modeling and Design, State Key Laboratory of Molecular Reaction Dynamics, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian, 116023, China.
Arch Biochem Biophys. 2024 Oct;760:110137. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2024.110137. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
As the important hub of many cellular signaling networks, KRAS (Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue) has been identified as a tumor biomarker. It is the frequently mutated oncogene in human cancers, and KRAS protein activation caused by mutations, such as G12D, has been found in many human tumors tissues. Although, there are two specific allosteric sites (AS1 and AS2) on the KRAS protein that can be used as the targets for inhibitor development, the difference of regulatory mechanisms between two individual allosteric sites still not be reported. Here, using molecular dynamics simulations combined with molecular mechanics generalized born surface area (MM/GBSA) analysis, we found that both of the inhibitors, located at AS1 and AS2, were able to reduce the binding free energy between wild type, mutant KRAS (G12/D/V/S/C) and GTP remarkably, however the effect of inhibitors on the binding free energy between wild type, mutant KRAS and GDP was limited. In addition, the degree of decrease of binding free energy between KRAS and GTP caused by inhibitors at AS2 was significantly greater than that caused by inhibitors at AS1. Further analysis revealed that both inhibitors at AS1 and AS2 were able to regulate the fluctuation of Switch Ⅰ and Switch Ⅱ to expand the pocket of the orthosteric site (GTP binding site), thereby reducing the binding of KRAS to GTP. Noteworthy there was significant differences in the regulatory preferences on Switch Ⅰ and Switch Ⅱ between two type inhibitor. The inhibitor at AS2 mainly regulated Switch Ⅱ to affect the pocket of the orthosteric site, while the inhibitor at AS1 mainly expand the pocket of the orthosteric site by regulating the fluctuation of Switch Ⅰ. Our study compared the differences between two type inhibitors in regulating the KRAS protein activity and revealed the advantages of the AS2 as the small molecule drug target, aiming to provide theoretical guidance for the research of novel KRAS protein inhibitors.
作为许多细胞信号网络的重要枢纽,KRAS(Kirsten 大鼠肉瘤病毒致癌基因同源物)已被确定为肿瘤标志物。它是人类癌症中经常发生突变的癌基因,并且突变(如 G12D)引起的 KRAS 蛋白激活已在许多人类肿瘤组织中发现。尽管 KRAS 蛋白上有两个特定的变构位点(AS1 和 AS2)可作为抑制剂开发的靶点,但两个变构位点的调节机制之间的差异尚未报道。在这里,我们使用分子动力学模拟结合分子力学广义 Born 表面积(MM/GBSA)分析,发现位于 AS1 和 AS2 的两种抑制剂都能够显著降低野生型、突变型 KRAS(G12/D/V/S/C)与 GTP 之间的结合自由能,但抑制剂对野生型、突变型 KRAS 与 GDP 之间的结合自由能的影响有限。此外,抑制剂在 AS2 上引起的 KRAS 与 GTP 之间的结合自由能的降低程度明显大于在 AS1 上引起的降低程度。进一步分析表明,AS1 和 AS2 上的两种抑制剂都能够调节 Switch Ⅰ 和 Switch Ⅱ的波动,从而扩大变构位点(GTP 结合位点)的口袋,从而降低 KRAS 与 GTP 的结合。值得注意的是,两种抑制剂在 Switch Ⅰ和 Switch Ⅱ上的调节偏好存在显著差异。AS2 上的抑制剂主要通过调节 Switch Ⅱ来影响变构位点的口袋,而 AS1 上的抑制剂主要通过调节 Switch Ⅰ的波动来扩大变构位点的口袋。我们的研究比较了两种抑制剂在调节 KRAS 蛋白活性方面的差异,并揭示了 AS2 作为小分子药物靶点的优势,旨在为新型 KRAS 蛋白抑制剂的研究提供理论指导。