Center for Molecular Cardiology, University of Zurich, Wagistreet 12, 8952 Schlieren, Switzerland.
Department of Cardiology, CHU Dijon Bourgogne, Dijon, France.
Eur Heart J. 2024 Nov 14;45(43):4564-4578. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae593.
Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains the primary cause of in-hospital death after acute coronary syndromes (ACS), with its plateauing mortality rates approaching 50%. To test novel interventions, personalized risk prediction is essential. The ORBI (Observatoire Régional Breton sur l'Infarctus) score represents the first-of-its-kind risk score to predict in-hospital CS in ACS patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, its sex-specific performance remains unknown, and refined risk prediction strategies are warranted.
This multinational study included a total of 53 537 ACS patients without CS on admission undergoing PCI. Following sex-specific evaluation of ORBI, regression and machine-learning models were used for variable selection and risk prediction. By combining best-performing models with highest-ranked predictors, SEX-SHOCK was developed, and internally and externally validated.
The ORBI score showed lower discriminative performance for the prediction of CS in females than males in Swiss (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [95% confidence interval]: 0.78 [0.76-0.81] vs. 0.81 [0.79-0.83]; P =.048) and French ACS patients (0.77 [0.74-0.81] vs. 0.84 [0.81-0.86]; P = .002). The newly developed SEX-SHOCK score, now incorporating ST-segment elevation, creatinine, C-reactive protein, and left ventricular ejection fraction, outperformed ORBI in both sexes (females: 0.81 [0.78-0.83]; males: 0.83 [0.82-0.85]; P < .001), which prevailed following internal and external validation in RICO (females: 0.82 [0.79-0.85]; males: 0.88 [0.86-0.89]; P < .001) and SPUM-ACS (females: 0.83 [0.77-0.90], P = .004; males: 0.83 [0.80-0.87], P = .001).
The ORBI score showed modest sex-specific performance. The novel SEX-SHOCK score provides superior performance in females and males across the entire spectrum of ACS, thus providing a basis for future interventional trials and contemporary ACS management.
心原性休克(CS)仍然是急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)后院内死亡的主要原因,其死亡率接近 50%,趋于平稳。为了测试新的干预措施,个性化风险预测至关重要。ORBI(布列塔尼急性心肌梗死观测站)评分是预测接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的 ACS 患者院内 CS 的首个风险评分。然而,其性别特异性表现尚不清楚,需要更精细的风险预测策略。
这项多中心研究共纳入 53537 例入院时无 CS 的 ACS 患者,均接受 PCI。在对 ORBI 进行性别特异性评估后,使用回归和机器学习模型进行变量选择和风险预测。通过将表现最佳的模型与排名最高的预测因素相结合,开发了 SEX-SHOCK 评分,并进行了内部和外部验证。
ORBI 评分在瑞士(接受者操作特征曲线下面积[95%置信区间]:女性为 0.78 [0.76-0.81] vs. 男性为 0.81 [0.79-0.83];P =.048)和法国 ACS 患者(女性为 0.77 [0.74-0.81] vs. 男性为 0.84 [0.81-0.86];P =.002)中,预测 CS 的区分性能均低于男性。新开发的 SEX-SHOCK 评分现在纳入了 ST 段抬高、肌酐、C 反应蛋白和左心室射血分数,在两性中均优于 ORBI(女性:0.81 [0.78-0.83];男性:0.83 [0.82-0.85];P <.001),并在 RICO(女性:0.82 [0.79-0.85];男性:0.88 [0.86-0.89];P <.001)和 SPUM-ACS(女性:0.83 [0.77-0.90],P =.004;男性:0.83 [0.80-0.87],P =.001)中进行了内部和外部验证。
ORBI 评分显示出适度的性别特异性表现。新型 SEX-SHOCK 评分在整个 ACS 谱中为女性和男性提供了更好的性能,从而为未来的介入试验和当代 ACS 管理提供了基础。