• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

诊断后72小时内的连续休克严重程度评估:心源性休克工作组报告。

Serial Shock Severity Assessment Within 72 Hours After Diagnosis: A Cardiogenic Shock Working Group Report.

作者信息

Ton Van-Khue, Li Song, John Kevin, Li Borui, Zweck Elric, Kanwar Manreet K, Sinha Shashank S, Hernandez-Montfort Jaime, Garan A Reshad, Goodman Rachel, Faugno Anthony, Farr Maryjane, Hall Shelley, Kataria Rachna, Guglin Maya, Vorovich Esther, Pahuja Mohit, Vallabhajosyula Saraschandra, Nathan Sandeep, Abraham Jacob, Harwani Neil M, Hickey Gavin W, Schwartzman Andrew D, Khalife Wissam, Mahr Claudius, Kim Ju H, Bhimaraj Arvind, Sangal Paavni, Kong Qiuyue, Walec Karol D, Zazzali Peter, Fried Justin, Burkhoff Daniel, Kapur Navin K

机构信息

Corrigan Minehan Heart Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Institute for Advanced Cardiac Care, Medical City Healthcare, Dallas, Texas, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024 Aug 1. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.04.069.

DOI:
10.1016/j.jacc.2024.04.069
PMID:39217545
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Cardiogenic Shock Working Group-modified Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (CSWG-SCAI) staging was developed to risk stratify cardiogenic shock (CS) severity. Data showing progressive changes in SCAI stages and outcomes are limited.

OBJECTIVES

We investigated serial changes in CSWG-SCAI stages and outcomes of patients presenting with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction (MI-CS) and heart failure-related CS (HF-CS).

METHODS

The multicenter CSWG registry was queried. CSWG-SCAI stages were computed at CS diagnosis and 24, 48, and 72 hours.

RESULTS

A total of 3,268 patients (57% HF-CS; 27% MI-CS) were included. At CS diagnosis, CSWG-SCAI stage breakdown was 593 (18.1%) stage B, 528 (16.2%) stage C, 1,659 (50.8%) stage D, and 488 (14.9%) noncardiac arrest stage E. At 24 hours, >50% of stages B and C patients worsened, but 86% of stage D patients stayed at stage D. Among stage E patients, 54% improved to stage D and 36% stayed at stage E by 24 hours. Minimal SCAI stage changes occurred beyond 24 hours. SCAI stage trajectories were similar between MI-CS and HF-CS groups. Within 24 hours, unadjusted mortality rates of patients with any SCAI stage worsening or improving were 44.6% and 34.2%, respectively. Patients who presented in or progressed to stage E by 24 hours had the worst prognosis. Survivors had lower lactate than nonsurvivors.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients with CS changed SCAI stages within 24 hours from CS diagnosis. Stage B patients were at high risk of worsening shock severity by 24 hours, associated with excess mortality. Early CS recognition and serial assessment may improve risk stratification.

摘要

背景

心源性休克工作组修订的心血管造影和介入学会(CSWG-SCAI)分期旨在对心源性休克(CS)的严重程度进行风险分层。显示SCAI分期和预后进行性变化的数据有限。

目的

我们调查了并发急性心肌梗死的心源性休克(MI-CS)和心力衰竭相关性心源性休克(HF-CS)患者的CSWG-SCAI分期及预后的系列变化。

方法

查询了多中心CSWG注册登记资料。在CS诊断时以及24、48和72小时计算CSWG-SCAI分期。

结果

共纳入3268例患者(57%为HF-CS;27%为MI-CS)。在CS诊断时,CSWG-SCAI分期分布为B期593例(18.1%)、C期528例(16.2%)、D期1659例(50.8%)和非心脏骤停E期488例(14.9%)。在24小时时,超过50%的B期和C期患者病情恶化,但86%的D期患者仍处于D期。在E期患者中,到24小时时,54%改善为D期,36%仍处于E期。24小时后SCAI分期变化极小。MI-CS组和HF-CS组的SCAI分期轨迹相似。在24小时内,任何SCAI分期恶化或改善的患者未经调整的死亡率分别为44.6%和34.2%。在24小时时处于或进展至E期的患者预后最差。幸存者的乳酸水平低于非幸存者。

结论

大多数CS患者在CS诊断后24小时内SCAI分期发生变化。B期患者在24小时内休克严重程度恶化风险高,与死亡率过高相关。早期识别CS并进行系列评估可能改善风险分层。

相似文献

1
Serial Shock Severity Assessment Within 72 Hours After Diagnosis: A Cardiogenic Shock Working Group Report.诊断后72小时内的连续休克严重程度评估:心源性休克工作组报告。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024 Aug 1. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.04.069.
2
Application of Cardiogenic Shock Working Group-defined Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (CSWG-SCAI) Staging of Cardiogenic Shock to the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database.将心源性休克工作组定义的心血管造影和介入学会(CSWG-SCAI)心源性休克分期应用于重症监护医学信息集市IV(MIMIC-IV)数据库。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2023 Dec;57:82-90. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2023.06.019. Epub 2023 Jun 23.
3
Clinical Presentation and In-Hospital Trajectory of Heart Failure and Cardiogenic Shock.心力衰竭和心源性休克的临床特征和住院过程。
JACC Heart Fail. 2023 Feb;11(2):176-187. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2022.10.002. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
4
Application of the Updated Cardiogenic Shock Working Group SCAI Classification for Cardiogenic Shock: A Single-Centre Analysis.更新后的心脏源性休克工作组SCAI分类在心脏源性休克中的应用:单中心分析
Can J Cardiol. 2025 Apr 29. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2025.03.036.
5
The Utility and Validation of SCAI-CSWG Stages in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction-Related Cardiogenic Shock.SCAI-CSWG分期在急性心肌梗死相关心源性休克患者中的效用及验证
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2024 Nov 19;4(1):102461. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102461. eCollection 2025 Jan.
6
Outcomes of Patients Transferred to Tertiary Care Centers for Treatment of Cardiogenic Shock: A Cardiogenic Shock Working Group Analysis.因心原性休克转至三级医疗中心治疗的患者的结局:心原性休克工作组分析。
J Card Fail. 2024 Apr;30(4):564-575. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2023.09.003. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
7
Complete Hemodynamic Profiling With Pulmonary Artery Catheters in Cardiogenic Shock Is Associated With Lower In-Hospital Mortality.肺动脉导管进行完全血流动力学分析与心源性休克患者院内死亡率降低相关。
JACC Heart Fail. 2020 Nov;8(11):903-913. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2020.08.012.
8
Criteria for Defining Stages of Cardiogenic Shock Severity.定义心源性休克严重程度分期的标准。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Jul 19;80(3):185-198. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.04.049.
9
Prognostic Utility of Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions Shock Stage Approach for Classifying Cardiogenic Shock Severity in Takotsubo Syndrome.Takotsubo 综合征心原性休克严重程度分类的心血管造影和介入治疗协会休克分期方法的预后价值。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Mar 19;13(6):e032951. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.032951. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
10
Admission Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention shock stage stratifies post-discharge mortality risk in cardiac intensive care unit patients.收治入院时的休克阶段会使心血管造影及介入治疗学会对心脏重症监护病房患者的出院后死亡率风险进行分层。
Am Heart J. 2020 Jan;219:37-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.10.012. Epub 2019 Oct 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictive value of the cardiogenic shock working group-modified SCAI criteria in early-stage heart failure-related cardiogenic shock.心源性休克工作组改良的SCAI标准在早期心力衰竭相关性心源性休克中的预测价值。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2025 Aug 26;60:101776. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2025.101776. eCollection 2025 Oct.
2
Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring in Acute Heart Failure and Cardiogenic Shock.急性心力衰竭和心源性休克的有创血流动力学监测
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Jun 19;26(6):27034. doi: 10.31083/RCM27034. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Left Ventricular Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices for Cardiogenic Shock After Myocardial Infarction.
用于心肌梗死后心源性休克的左心室机械循环支持装置
Cardiol Ther. 2025 Jun;14(2):123-139. doi: 10.1007/s40119-025-00413-9. Epub 2025 May 9.
4
From Spoke to Hub: The "Golden Hours" in Cardiogenic Shock.从辐条到轮毂:心源性休克中的“黄金时间”
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Feb 18;14(4):e039100. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.039100. Epub 2025 Feb 14.
5
Clinical Review of Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction - Revascularization, Mechanical Circulatory Support, and Beyond.急性心肌梗死后心源性休克的临床综述——血运重建、机械循环支持及其他。
Circ Rep. 2024 Nov 29;7(1):6-14. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-24-0141. eCollection 2025 Jan 10.