Suppr超能文献

糖化血红蛋白 A1c 分析仪床边即时检验与基于实验室设备检测性能的比较:一项多中心验证研究。

Performance evaluation of the glycated hemoglobin A1c analyzer for point-of-care testing compared with laboratory-based devices: a multicenter validation study.

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

Department of Endocrinology, Drum Tower Hospital affiliated to Nanjing University Medical School, Branch of National Clinical Research Center for Metabolic Diseases, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2024 Sep;84(5):356-361. doi: 10.1080/00365513.2024.2394793. Epub 2024 Sep 1.

Abstract

In this dual-center study, we assessed the BioHermes A1C EXP M13 system for point-of-care (POC) HbA1c testing against two NGSP-certified HPLC instruments, the Bio-Rad D100 and Tosoh G8. Analyzing 605 samples, we evaluated the A1C EXP's reproducibility, sensitivity, specificity and impact of anemia on HbA1c measurements. The device showed excellent reproducibility with CVs under 2.4% and high sensitivity and specificity for diabetes diagnosis-98.1% and 96.8% against D100, and 97.1% and 96.7% against G8. Passing-Bablok regression confirmed a close correlation between A1C EXP and the HPLC instruments, with equations  = 0.10625 + 0.9688x (D100) and  = 0.0000 + 0.1000x (G8), and Bland-Altman plots indicated mean relative differences of -1.4% (D100) and -0.4% (G8). However, in anemic samples, A1C EXP showed a negative bias compared to HPLC devices, suggesting that anemia may affect the accuracy of HbA1c results. The study indicates that A1C EXP is a reliable POC alternative to laboratory assays, albeit with considerations for anemic patients.

摘要

在这项双中心研究中,我们评估了 BioHermes A1C EXP M13 系统用于即时(POC)HbA1c 检测的性能,与两台经过 NGSP 认证的 HPLC 仪器,即 Bio-Rad D100 和 Tosoh G8 进行了对比。我们分析了 605 个样本,评估了 A1C EXP 的重复性、灵敏度、特异性以及贫血对 HbA1c 测量的影响。该设备表现出出色的重复性,CV 值低于 2.4%,对糖尿病诊断具有高灵敏度和特异性-与 D100 相比为 98.1%和 96.8%,与 G8 相比为 97.1%和 96.7%。Passing-Bablok 回归证实了 A1C EXP 与 HPLC 仪器之间的密切相关性,方程为  = 0.10625 + 0.9688x(D100)和  = 0.0000 + 0.1000x(G8),Bland-Altman 图表明平均相对差异为-1.4%(D100)和-0.4%(G8)。然而,在贫血样本中,A1C EXP 与 HPLC 设备相比显示出负偏差,表明贫血可能会影响 HbA1c 结果的准确性。该研究表明,A1C EXP 是一种可靠的 POC 替代实验室检测方法,但需要考虑贫血患者的情况。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验