• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国人对艰难梭菌疫苗的偏好。

Preferences for a Clostridioides difficile vaccine among adults in the United States.

机构信息

Pfizer Inc, 500 Arcola Road, Collegeville, PA 19426, USA.

Oracle Life Sciences, 2300 Oracle Way, Austin, TX 78741, USA.

出版信息

Vaccine. 2024 Oct 24;42(24):126261. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126261. Epub 2024 Aug 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126261
PMID:39217776
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Clostridioides difficile (C.diff) infection (CDI) causes significant morbidity and mortality among older adults. Vaccines to prevent CDI are in development; however, data on the target population's preferences are needed to inform vaccination recommendations in the United States (US). This study assessed US adults' willingness to receive a C.diff vaccine and examined how vaccine attributes influence their choices.

METHODS

A cross-sectional online survey with a discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted among US adults aged ≥50 years. DCE attributes included effectiveness, duration of protection, reduction in symptom severity, out-of-pocket (OOP) costs, number of doses, and side effects. The DCE included 11 choice tasks, each with two hypothetical vaccine profiles and an opt-out (i.e., no vaccine). Attribute-level preference weights were estimated using hierarchical Bayesian modeling. Attribute relative importance (RI) was compared between select subgroups.

RESULTS

Of 1216 adults in the analyses, 29.9% reported they knew either 'a little' (20.7%) or 'a lot' (9.2%) about C.diff before the study. A C.diff vaccine was chosen 58.0% of the time (vs. opt-out) across choice tasks. It was estimated that up to 75.0% would choose a vaccine when OOP was $0. Those who were immunocompromised/high-risk for CDI (vs. not) more frequently chose a C.diff vaccine. Decreases in OOP costs (RI = 56.1), improvements in vaccine effectiveness (RI = 17.7), and reduction in symptom severity (RI = 10.3) were most important to vaccine choice. The rank ordering of attributes by importance was consistent across subgroups.

CONCLUSION

OOP cost, improvements in vaccine effectiveness, and reduction in CDI severity were highly influential to vaccine selection. Most adults aged ≥50 years were receptive to a C.diff vaccine, especially with little-to-no OOP cost, suggesting that mandating insurance coverage of vaccination with no copayment may increase uptake. The limited awareness about C.diff among adults presents an opportunity for healthcare providers to educate their patients about CDI prevention.

摘要

介绍

艰难梭菌(C.diff)感染(CDI)会给老年人带来严重的发病率和死亡率。目前正在开发预防 CDI 的疫苗;然而,为了在美国提供疫苗接种建议,需要了解目标人群的偏好。本研究评估了美国成年人接种 C.diff 疫苗的意愿,并研究了疫苗属性如何影响他们的选择。

方法

对 50 岁及以上的美国成年人进行了一项横断面在线调查和离散选择实验(DCE)。DCE 属性包括有效性、保护持续时间、症状严重程度减轻、自付费用(OOP)、剂量数和副作用。DCE 包括 11 个选择任务,每个任务都有两种假设的疫苗概况和一个选择退出(即没有疫苗)。使用分层贝叶斯模型估计属性水平偏好权重。比较了特定亚组之间的属性相对重要性(RI)。

结果

在分析中,1216 名成年人中有 29.9%在研究前表示他们对艰难梭菌了解“一点”(20.7%)或“很多”(9.2%)。在所有选择任务中,58.0%的人选择了 C.diff 疫苗(vs. 选择退出)。据估计,当 OOP 为 0 时,多达 75.0%的人会选择疫苗。与非免疫受损/高危 CDI 人群(vs. 非免疫受损/高危 CDI 人群)相比,免疫受损/高危 CDI 人群更常选择 C.diff 疫苗。降低 OOP 成本(RI=56.1)、提高疫苗有效性(RI=17.7)和减轻 CDI 严重程度(RI=10.3)对疫苗选择最为重要。重要性的属性排序在各亚组之间是一致的。

结论

OOP 成本、疫苗有效性的提高和 CDI 严重程度的降低对疫苗选择具有重要影响。大多数 50 岁及以上的成年人对 C.diff 疫苗持接受态度,尤其是 OOP 成本较低或为零,这表明强制要求医疗保险不收取疫苗接种自付费用可能会增加疫苗接种率。成年人对艰难梭菌的认识有限,这为医疗保健提供者提供了一个向患者宣传 CDI 预防的机会。

相似文献

1
Preferences for a Clostridioides difficile vaccine among adults in the United States.美国人对艰难梭菌疫苗的偏好。
Vaccine. 2024 Oct 24;42(24):126261. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126261. Epub 2024 Aug 31.
2
Herpes zoster vaccination and vaccine preferences among persons aged 50-64 years in Australia: Findings from a discrete choice experiment.澳大利亚50-64岁人群中带状疱疹疫苗接种情况及疫苗偏好:离散选择实验的结果
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2025 Dec;21(1):2550102. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2025.2550102. Epub 2025 Aug 28.
3
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
4
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
5
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
6
Safety and Immunogenicity of an Adjuvanted Clostridioides difficile Vaccine Candidate in Healthy Adults: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Phase 1 Study.一种含佐剂的艰难梭菌候选疫苗在健康成年人中的安全性和免疫原性:一项随机安慰剂对照1期研究。
J Infect Dis. 2025 Mar 17;231(3):e511-e520. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiae466.
7
Probiotics for the prevention of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in adults and children.用于预防成人和儿童艰难梭菌相关性腹泻的益生菌
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 19;12(12):CD006095. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006095.pub4.
8
Fecal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile (Clostridium difficile).粪便微生物移植治疗复发性艰难梭菌(艰难梭菌)。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Apr 25;4(4):CD013871. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013871.pub2.
9
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
10
Immunogenicity and seroefficacy of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.肺炎球菌结合疫苗的免疫原性和血清效力:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jul;28(34):1-109. doi: 10.3310/YWHA3079.