Employing magnetic resonance histology for precision chronic limb-threatening ischemia treatment planning.

OBJECTIVE

Recent randomized controlled trials have demonstrated a notable prevalence of immediate technical failures in percutaneous vascular interventions (PVIs) for complex arterial lesions associated with chronic limb-threatening ischemia. Current imaging modalities present inherent limitations in identifying these lesions, making it challenging to determine the most suitable candidates for PVI. We present a novel preprocedural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) histology protocol for identifying lesions that might present a higher rate of immediate and midterm PVI failure.

METHODS

We enrolled 22 patients (13 females, average age 65.8 ± 9.72 years) scheduled for PVI were prospectively and underwent 3T MRI using ultrashort echo time and steady-state free precession contrasts to characterize target lesions before PVI. Lesions were scored as hard if >50% of the lumen was occluded by hard components (calcium/dense collagen) on MRI in the hardest cross-section. Two readers evaluated MRI datasets. Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus Document on Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC)/Global Limb Anatomic Staging System (GLASS)/Wound, Ischemia and Foot infection scoring was performed based on intraprocedural angiograms and chart review. The relationship between MRI scoring, TASC/GLASS scoring, and procedural outcomes was investigated using univariate analysis. Midterm follow-up (revascularization and amputation rates) was recorded at 3 and 6 months after the intervention.

RESULTS

Our cohort of 22 patients yielded 40 target lesions. Five lesions were excluded (two for nondiagnostic image quality; three PVIs were ultimately diagnostic only). Six lesions (17%) were scored as hard. MRI-scored hard lesions had a higher proportion of immediate technical failure (hard vs soft 83% [5/6] vs 3% [1/29]; P < .001). Hard vs soft MRI scoring was the only factor significantly associated with immediate PVI technical success (P < .001), as opposed to TASC/GLASS scoring. Both at 3 months and 6 months after PVI, the reintervention rate was significantly higher among those lesions which were scored hard on MRI (3 months hard, 80% vs soft, 16% [P =.011]; 6 months hard, 80% vs soft, 27%; P = .047).

CONCLUSIONS

MRI histology could be a valuable tool for optimizing PVI patient selection and treatment strategies.