State Key Laboratory of Black Soils Conservation and Utilization, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changchun, China.
Department of Applied Biology, Technical University of Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya.
Ecology. 2024 Oct;105(10):e4401. doi: 10.1002/ecy.4401. Epub 2024 Sep 1.
Globally, numerous ecosystems have been co-invaded by multiple exotic plant species that can have competitive or facilitative interactions with each other and with native plants. Invaded ecosystems often exhibit spatial heterogeneity in soil moisture and nutrient levels, with some habitats having more nutrient-rich and moist soils than others. The stress-gradient hypothesis predicts that plants are likely to engage in facilitative interactions when growing in stressful environments, such as nutrient-deficient or water-deficient soils. In contrast, when resources are abundant, competitive interactions between plants should prevail. The invasional meltdown hypothesis proposes that facilitative interactions between invasive species can enhance their establishment and amplify their ecological impact. Considering both hypotheses can offer insights into the complex interactions among invasive and native plants across environmental gradients. However, experimental tests of the effects of soil moisture and nutrient co-limitation on interactions between invasive and native plants at both interspecific and intraspecific levels in light of these hypotheses are lacking. We performed a greenhouse pot experiment in which we cultivated individual focal plants from five congeneric pairs of invasive and native species. Each focal plant was subjected to one of three levels of plant-plant interactions: (1) intraspecific, in which the focal plant was grown with another individual of the same species; (2) interspecific, involving a native and an invasive plant; and (3) interspecific, involving two native or invasive individuals. These plant-plant interaction treatments were fully crossed with two levels of water availability (drought vs. well-watered) and two levels of nutrient supply (low vs. high). Consistent with the stress-gradient and invasional meltdown hypotheses, our findings show that under low-nutrient conditions, the biomass production of invasive focal plants was facilitated by invasive interspecific neighbors. However, under high-nutrient conditions, the biomass production of invasive focal plants was suppressed by invasive interspecific neighbors. When competing with native interspecific neighbors, high-nutrient conditions similarly enhanced the biomass production of both invasive and native focal plants. Invasive and native focal plants were neither competitively suppressed nor facilitated by conspecific neighbors. Taken together, these results suggest that co-occurring invasive exotic plant species may facilitate each other in low-nutrient habitats but compete in high-nutrient habitats.
从全球范围来看,许多生态系统同时受到多种外来植物物种的入侵,这些物种之间以及与本地植物之间可能存在竞争或促进作用。受入侵的生态系统通常表现出土壤水分和养分水平的空间异质性,一些栖息地的土壤比其他栖息地更富有养分和湿润。胁迫梯度假说预测,当植物在胁迫环境中生长时,如养分缺乏或缺水的土壤中,它们可能会进行促进作用。相反,当资源丰富时,植物之间的竞争作用应该占主导地位。入侵崩溃假说提出,入侵物种之间的促进作用可以增强它们的建立,并放大它们的生态影响。考虑到这两个假说,可以深入了解在环境梯度上入侵植物和本地植物之间的复杂相互作用。然而,鉴于这些假说,缺乏在种间和种内水平上,实验测试土壤水分和养分共同限制对入侵植物和本地植物相互作用的影响。我们进行了一项温室盆栽实验,在实验中,我们培育了五个入侵和本地同属物种对的五个个体的焦点植物。每个焦点植物都经历了三种植物-植物相互作用水平之一:(1)种内,其中焦点植物与同一物种的另一个个体一起生长;(2)种间,涉及一个本地和一个入侵植物;(3)种间,涉及两个本地或入侵个体。这些植物-植物相互作用处理与两种水分供应水平(干旱与充分浇水)和两种养分供应水平(低与高)完全交叉。与胁迫梯度和入侵崩溃假说一致,我们的研究结果表明,在低养分条件下,入侵焦点植物的生物量生产受到入侵种间邻居的促进。然而,在高养分条件下,入侵焦点植物的生物量生产受到入侵种间邻居的抑制。当与本地种间邻居竞争时,高养分条件同样增强了入侵和本地焦点植物的生物量生产。入侵和本地焦点植物既不受同物种邻居的竞争抑制,也不受其促进。总的来说,这些结果表明,共存的入侵外来植物物种可能在低养分栖息地相互促进,但在高养分栖息地相互竞争。