Liu Imogen Taotao
Department of Political Science and Public Administration, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Area Dev Policy. 2023 May 24;9(3):343-364. doi: 10.1080/23792949.2023.2200546. eCollection 2024.
The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has been theorised as a spatial fix to China's overaccumulation problem, and as such, an implicitly productivist endeavour. This article opens up conceptual space to consider how historically and geographically mediated forms of financialisation have tempered the unfolding of the BRI in peripheral economies. Drawing on the Serbian post-socialist transition context, financialisation has been characterised by underinvestment and a persistent dependency on foreign, market-based capital inflows which have (1) precipitated state transformations to mobilise Chinese financing for BRI projects, strengthening the role of the state in industrial rejuvenation; and (2) created an institutional palimpsest conducive to non-productive forms of surplus value appropriation that demonstrates the hybridity of accumulation imperatives underlying the BRI.
“一带一路”倡议(BRI)被理论化为解决中国资本过度积累问题的一种空间修复方式,因此是一种隐含的生产主义努力。本文开辟了概念空间,以思考金融化在历史和地理上的不同形式如何影响了“一带一路”倡议在外围经济体中的发展。借鉴塞尔维亚后社会主义转型背景,金融化的特点是投资不足以及持续依赖基于市场的外国资本流入,这导致了:(1)国家转型以动员中国为“一带一路”项目提供融资,强化了国家在产业复兴中的作用;(2)形成了一种有利于非生产性剩余价值占有的制度叠加效应,这表明了“一带一路”倡议背后积累需求的混合性。