Ha Nguyen Thanh, Chi Nguyen Thi Yen, Van Nuil Jennifer, Thwaites Louise, Chambers Mary
Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Hochiminh, Vietnam.
Global Health Bioethics Network, Oxford, UK.
Wellcome Open Res. 2022 Nov 2;7:271. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.18457.1. eCollection 2022.
Vaccine hesitancy has become a prominent public health concern, particularly within the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic context. Worries about vaccine side effects are often cited as a reason for hesitancy, while media reporting about this topic plays an important role in influencing the public's perspectives about vaccines and vaccination. In Vietnam, during 2012-2013, there were several adverse events following immunization (AEFIs) of Quinvaxem- a pentavalent vaccine in the Expanded Immunization Program, which made big headlines in the media. Such incidences have contributed to changes in vaccination policies and influenced parents' concerns to date. This study explores the portrayal of Quinvaxem in Vietnam digital news during four periods marked by important events. We performed quantitative and qualitative analysis with a coding framework to identify main content focus, sentiments towards Quinvaxem, and emotional tones in these articles. In total, we included 360 articles into analysis. The amount of news coverage about Quinvaxem increased after AEFIs happened, from 7 articles before AEFIs to 98 and 159 articles in the following periods when AEFIs and investigation into vaccine safety occurred. Most articles are neutral in titles (n=255/360) and content (n=215/360) towards Quinvaxem and do not convey emotional expressions (n=271/360). However, articles focusing on side effects contain negative sentiments and emotional expressions more frequently than articles of other contents while AEFIs details were conflicting across articles. Vaccine sentiments are provoked in the information about vaccine quality and safety, health authority, local delivery, and quoted vaccine opinions. Emotion-conveying elements in 89/360 articles included emotional wording and imagery and expressive punctuation. : The heterogeneity of information in online news may reinforce uncertainty about vaccine safety and decrease vaccine intention. Our results have important implications for vaccine communication, given the current plan of the Vietnamese government to roll out COVID-19 vaccination to younger children.
疫苗犹豫已成为一个突出的公共卫生问题,尤其是在2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行背景下。对疫苗副作用的担忧常被引述为犹豫的一个原因,而媒体对这一话题的报道在影响公众对疫苗和接种疫苗的看法方面发挥着重要作用。在越南,2012 - 2013年期间,扩大免疫规划中的五价疫苗“五苗”(Quinvaxem)接种后出现了几起免疫接种后不良事件(AEFI),这在媒体上成为大新闻。此类事件导致了疫苗接种政策的变化,并至今仍影响着家长们的担忧。本研究探讨了在以重要事件为标志的四个时期越南数字新闻中对“五苗”的描述。我们使用编码框架进行了定量和定性分析,以确定这些文章的主要内容焦点、对“五苗”的态度以及情感基调。我们总共纳入了360篇文章进行分析。“五苗”的新闻报道量在AEFI事件发生后有所增加,从AEFI事件发生前的7篇文章增加到AEFI事件和疫苗安全性调查期间随后两个时期的98篇和159篇文章。大多数文章在标题(n = 255/360)和内容(n = 215/360)上对“五苗”持中立态度,且不传达情感表达(n = 271/360)。然而,关注副作用的文章比其他内容的文章更频繁地包含负面态度和情感表达,而各文章中AEFI的细节相互矛盾。在有关疫苗质量和安全性、卫生当局、本地接种情况以及引用的疫苗观点的信息中引发了疫苗态度。360篇文章中有89篇包含情感表达的元素,包括情感措辞、意象和富有表现力的标点符号。在线新闻中信息的异质性可能会加剧对疫苗安全性的不确定性,并降低接种疫苗的意愿。鉴于越南政府目前向年幼儿童推广COVID - 19疫苗接种的计划,我们的研究结果对疫苗宣传具有重要意义。