Suppr超能文献

急诊科患者胆道超声检查中肝总管识别的效用

Utility of Common Bile Duct Identification on Biliary Ultrasound in Emergency Department Patients.

作者信息

Thom Christopher, Yaworsky Justin, Livingstone Kevin, Han David, Ottenhoff Jakob

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.

出版信息

Open Access Emerg Med. 2024 Aug 28;16:221-229. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S468678. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Biliary ultrasound is often utilized in the evaluation of abdominal pain in the Emergency Department (ED). Common bile duct (CBD) identification is traditionally a standard component of the biliary ultrasound examination but can be challenging to perform for the novice sonographer. Previous work has demonstrated that CBD dilatation is rare in cases of cholecystitis with normal liver function tests (LFTs). We sought to assess the frequency of CBD dilatation in the subset of ED patients undergoing hepatobiliary ultrasound who have normal LFTs and an absence of gallstones or biliary sludge on ultrasound. We also performed an assessment of changes in CBD diameter by age and cholecystectomy status.

METHODS

This was a retrospective chart review at a single academic ED. Patients were enrolled in the study if they underwent a radiology performed (RP) hepatobiliary ultrasound within the 2 year study period. Records were reviewed for the presence of gallstones or sludge, CBD diameter, age, clinical indication for the ultrasound, and LFTs. Descriptive analyses were performed, and interobserver agreement among data abstractors was assessed by analysis for the presence of CBD dilatation. The Mann-Whitney test was utilized to assess statistical significance in the comparison of differences between CBD diameters amongst age groups.

RESULTS

Of 1929 RP hepatobiliary ultrasounds performed in the study period, 312 were excluded and 1617 met inclusion criteria. Amongst these, there were 506 patients who had normal LFTs and an ultrasound with no stones or sludge. Ten patients within this group had a dilated CBD > 7 mm (1.98%, 95% CI of 1.08% to 3.6%). We also noted a statistically significant increase in CBD size in the older age cohort and in those individuals with a history of cholecystectomy.

CONCLUSION

CBD dilation in ED patients who present with normal LFTs and an absence of gallstones and biliary sludge is rare. Physicians should be reassured that the routine identification of the CBD on ultrasound in this setting is of low yield and need not be pursued.

摘要

背景

急诊科(ED)对腹痛进行评估时,常采用胆道超声检查。传统上,识别胆总管(CBD)是胆道超声检查的标准组成部分,但对于新手超声检查医师而言,操作起来可能具有挑战性。先前的研究表明,肝功能检查(LFTs)正常的胆囊炎患者中,胆总管扩张很少见。我们试图评估急诊患者中肝功能检查正常且超声检查未发现胆结石或胆泥的亚组中胆总管扩张的频率。我们还按年龄和胆囊切除术状态对胆总管直径的变化进行了评估。

方法

这是在一家学术性急诊科进行的回顾性病历审查。如果患者在2年研究期内接受了放射科进行的(RP)肝胆超声检查,则纳入本研究。审查记录以确定是否存在胆结石或胆泥、胆总管直径、年龄、超声检查的临床指征以及肝功能检查结果。进行描述性分析,并通过分析胆总管扩张情况评估数据提取人员之间的观察者间一致性。采用曼-惠特尼检验评估各年龄组胆总管直径差异比较中的统计学显著性。

结果

在研究期间进行的1929次放射科肝胆超声检查中,312次被排除,1617次符合纳入标准。其中,有506例患者肝功能检查正常且超声检查未发现结石或胆泥。该组中有10例患者胆总管扩张>7mm(1.98%,95%CI为1.08%至3.6%)。我们还注意到老年队列以及有胆囊切除术史的个体的胆总管大小有统计学显著增加。

结论

肝功能检查正常且无胆结石和胆泥的急诊患者中,胆总管扩张很少见。医师应放心,在此情况下超声常规识别胆总管的阳性率较低,无需进行。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4581/11366253/860ce18dba97/OAEM-16-221-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Utility of Common Bile Duct Identification on Biliary Ultrasound in Emergency Department Patients.
Open Access Emerg Med. 2024 Aug 28;16:221-229. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S468678. eCollection 2024.
2
Emergency biliary sonography: utility of common bile duct measurement in the diagnosis of cholecystitis and choledocholithiasis.
J Emerg Med. 2014 Jan;46(1):54-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.03.024. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
3
Utility of common bile duct measurement in ED point of care ultrasound: A prospective study.
Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Jun;36(6):962-966. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.10.064. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
5
Utility of common bile duct measurement in the diagnosis of cholecystitis and choledocholithiasis in children.
Am J Emerg Med. 2024 May;79:38-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.01.045. Epub 2024 Feb 4.
8
Efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound after removal of common bile duct stone.
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2019 Sep;54(9):1160-1165. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2019.1660911. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
9

本文引用的文献

1
Accuracy and clinical use of biliary point-of-care ultrasound: A retrospective cohort study.
Emerg Med Australas. 2023 Apr;35(2):218-224. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.14099. Epub 2022 Oct 4.
2
Point of care biliary ultrasound in the emergency department (BUSED) predicts final surgical management decisions.
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2022 Sep 2;7(1):e000944. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2022-000944. eCollection 2022.
3
ACR Appropriateness Criteria Right Upper Quadrant Pain.
J Am Coll Radiol. 2019 May;16(5S):S235-S243. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.02.013.
4
Point-of-care biliary ultrasound in the emergency department (BUSED): implications for surgical referral and emergency department wait times.
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2018 Jul 30;3(1):e000164. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2018-000164. eCollection 2018.
6
Utility of common bile duct measurement in ED point of care ultrasound: A prospective study.
Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Jun;36(6):962-966. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.10.064. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
8
Emergency Ultrasound Imaging Criteria Compendium.
Ann Emerg Med. 2016 Jul;68(1):e11-48. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.04.028.
9
Incidentally Identified Common Bile Duct Dilatation: A Systematic Review of Evaluation, Causes, and Outcome.
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015 Nov-Dec;49(10):810-5. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000394.
10
Hospital readmission after emergency room visit for cholelithiasis.
J Surg Res. 2015 Aug;197(2):318-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.04.032. Epub 2015 Apr 16.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验