Suppr超能文献

健康政策人类学。

Anthropologies of health policy.

机构信息

Social Policy, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

出版信息

Anthropol Med. 2024 Mar-Jun;31(1-2):1-17. doi: 10.1080/13648470.2024.2373012. Epub 2024 Sep 2.

Abstract

In this introduction to our special issue, we take a wide view of the history and epistemic stakes of anthropological and ethnographic approaches to health policy. Drawing on the history of critical medical anthropology, the anthropology of policy, and critical policy studies, we show how anthropologies of health policy are particularly essential in this current moment, as policy production becomes increasingly abstracted and even more entwined with specific forms of evidence making. Taken together, the contributors of this special issue argue that anthropology's interventions into health policy are essential in three ways. First, they shed light on the practices of policy 'communities', the pragmatic parameters under which they work, and the central logics under which health policy actors are operating. Second, they examine the effects of policy implementation upon those intended to be the subjects of health policy, highlighting the effects of policy for those marginalised by gender, race, and caste. Here, anthropology provides a view into the 'lived experience' of those targeted by health policy, but it also demands that anthropologists provide 'counter-stories' and 'counter-evidences' that dismantle narrow systems of policy knowledge production. Finally, anthropological attention provides an essential lens into the things that carry over in the act of policy reform-the past reverberations and imperial inheritances. Together with our contributors, we call for anthropologies of health policy that work to highlight and dismantle such inheritances.

摘要

在本期特刊的引言中,我们从广泛的角度探讨了人类学和民族志方法在健康政策研究中的历史和认识意义。本研究借鉴了批判医学人类学、政策人类学和批判政策研究的历史,展示了健康政策人类学在当前这个时刻尤为重要,因为政策制定变得越来越抽象,甚至与特定形式的证据制作更加交织在一起。本期特刊的撰稿人认为,人类学对健康政策的干预有三个重要方面。首先,它们揭示了政策“共同体”的实践,以及它们运作的实际参数和健康政策参与者所遵循的核心逻辑。其次,它们考察了政策实施对那些原本应该是健康政策对象的人的影响,强调了政策对那些因性别、种族和种姓而边缘化的人的影响。在这里,人类学提供了一个了解健康政策目标人群“生活体验”的视角,但它也要求人类学家提供“反面故事”和“反面证据”,以打破狭隘的政策知识生产体系。最后,人类学的关注为政策改革的行为提供了一个重要的视角,即过去的反响和帝国遗产。我们与撰稿人一起呼吁开展健康政策人类学研究,以突出和打破这些遗产。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验