Suppr超能文献

探索治疗抵抗性重度抑郁症的最佳氯胺酮给药方案。

The quest for optimal ketamine dosing formula in treatment-resistant major depressive disorder.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, 80-214, Poland.

出版信息

Pharmacol Rep. 2024 Dec;76(6):1318-1324. doi: 10.1007/s43440-024-00637-x. Epub 2024 Aug 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Emerging evidence indicates that intravenous ketamine is effective in managing treatment-resistant unipolar and bipolar depression. Clinical studies highlight its favorable efficacy, safety, and tolerability profile within a dosage range of 0.5-1.0 mg/kg based on actual body weight. However, data on alternative dosage calculation methods, particularly in relation to body mass index (BMI) and therapeutic outcomes, remain limited.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis of an open-label study aims to evaluate dose calculation strategies and their impact on treatment response among inpatients with treatment-resistant major depressive disorder (MDD) (n = 28). The study employed the Boer and Devine formulas to determine lean body mass (LBM) and ideal body weight (IBW), and the Mosteller formula to estimate body surface area (BSA). The calculated doses were then compared with the actual doses administered or converted to a dosage per square meter for both responders and non-responders.

RESULTS

Regardless of treatment response, defined as a reduction of 50% in the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale, the use of alternative ketamine dosing formulas resulted in underdosing compared to the standardized dose of 0.5 mg/kg. Only two participants received higher doses (102.7% and 113.0%) when the Devine formula was applied.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that ketamine dosing formulas, alternative to the standardized 0.5 mg/kg based on body weight, may lead to underdosing and potentially impact outcome interpretation. To enhance dosing accuracy, future studies should consider incorporating body impedance analysis and waist-to-hip ratio measurements, as this study did not account for body composition.

摘要

背景

新出现的证据表明,静脉注射氯胺酮在治疗抵抗性单相和双相抑郁症方面是有效的。临床研究强调了其在基于实际体重的 0.5-1.0mg/kg 剂量范围内的良好疗效、安全性和耐受性特征。然而,关于替代剂量计算方法的数据,特别是关于体重指数(BMI)和治疗结果的数据仍然有限。

方法

本回顾性分析是一项开放标签研究,旨在评估剂量计算策略及其对治疗抵抗性重度抑郁症(MDD)住院患者(n=28)治疗反应的影响。该研究采用 Boer 和 Devine 公式来确定瘦体重(LBM)和理想体重(IBW),并采用 Mosteller 公式来估计体表面积(BSA)。然后将计算出的剂量与实际给予的剂量或转换为每平方米剂量进行比较,以比较应答者和无应答者。

结果

无论治疗反应如何,定义为蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表(MADRS)评分降低 50%,与标准化剂量 0.5mg/kg 相比,使用替代氯胺酮剂量公式会导致剂量不足。只有当使用 Devine 公式时,才有两名参与者接受了更高的剂量(102.7%和 113.0%)。

结论

本研究表明,与基于体重的标准化 0.5mg/kg 相比,替代氯胺酮剂量公式可能导致剂量不足,并可能影响结果解释。为了提高剂量准确性,未来的研究应考虑纳入身体阻抗分析和腰臀比测量,因为本研究没有考虑身体成分。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

3
Surrogate Adiposity Markers and Mortality.替代肥胖标志物与死亡率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Sep 5;6(9):e2334836. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.34836.
4
Bioimpedance basics and phase angle fundamentals.生物阻抗基础与相位角基础。
Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2023 Jun;24(3):381-391. doi: 10.1007/s11154-022-09780-3. Epub 2023 Feb 7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验