Division of Medical Toxicology, Ronald O. Perelman Department of Emergency Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
New York City Poison Center, New York, NY, USA.
Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2024 Oct;62(10):609-614. doi: 10.1080/15563650.2024.2397053. Epub 2024 Sep 2.
The use of the osmol gap as a surrogate marker of toxic alcohol poisoning is common. Unfortunately, many patients with alcoholic ketoacidosis have elevated osmol gaps and are misdiagnosed with toxic alcohol poisoning. We aimed to characterize the range of osmol gaps in patients with alcoholic ketoacidosis.
This was a retrospective poison center study. Data from 24 years were reviewed using the following case definition of alcoholic ketoacidosis: (1) documented alcohol use disorder; (2) presence of urine or serum ketones or an elevated blood beta-hydroxybutyrate concentration; (3) an anion gap ≥14 mmol/L. Potential cases of alcoholic ketoacidosis that failed to fulfill all three criteria were adjudicated by three toxicologists. Exclusion criteria included (1) detectable toxic alcohol concentration, (2) hemodialysis and/or multiple doses of fomepizole, (3) no osmol gap documented, (4) other diagnoses that lead to a metabolic acidosis. Demographics, pH, anion gap, lactate concentration, and osmol gap were extracted.
Of 1,493 patients screened, 55 met criteria for alcoholic ketoacidosis. Sixty-four percent were male, and their median age was 52 years. The median osmol gap was 27 [IQR 18-36]. The largest anion gap was 57 mmol/L, and the lowest pH was 6.8. Forty-five (82%) of the patients with alcoholic ketoacidosis had osmol gaps >10; 38 (69%) had osmol gaps >20; 24 (44%) had osmol gaps >30; 11 (20%) had osmol gaps > 40.
The large range of osmol gaps in patients with alcoholic ketoacidosis often reaches values associated with toxic alcohol poisoning. The study is limited by the potential for transcribing errors and the inability to identify the cause of the osmol gap.
In this retrospective study, patients with alcoholic ketoacidosis had a median osmol gap of 27. Given that alcoholic ketoacidosis is easily and inexpensively treated, proper identification may prevent costly and invasive treatment directed at toxic alcohol poisoning.
使用渗透压间隙作为有毒性酒精中毒的替代标志物很常见。不幸的是,许多患有酒精性酮症酸中毒的患者存在渗透压间隙升高的情况,并被误诊为有毒性酒精中毒。我们旨在描述酒精性酮症酸中毒患者渗透压间隙的范围。
这是一项回顾性毒理学中心研究。使用以下酒精性酮症酸中毒的病例定义回顾了 24 年来的数据:(1)有记录的酒精使用障碍;(2)尿液或血清酮体存在或血β-羟丁酸浓度升高;(3)阴离子间隙≥14mmol/L。未能满足所有三个标准的疑似酒精性酮症酸中毒病例由三位毒理学家进行裁决。排除标准包括:(1)检测到有毒性酒精浓度;(2)血液透析和/或多次使用甲福明;(3)未记录渗透压间隙;(4)有导致代谢性酸中毒的其他诊断。提取了人口统计学数据、pH 值、阴离子间隙、乳酸浓度和渗透压间隙。
在筛选的 1493 名患者中,有 55 名符合酒精性酮症酸中毒的标准。64%为男性,中位年龄为 52 岁。渗透压间隙中位数为 27[IQR 18-36]。最大的阴离子间隙为 57mmol/L,最低 pH 值为 6.8。45(82%)名患有酒精性酮症酸中毒的患者渗透压间隙>10;38(69%)名患者渗透压间隙>20;24(44%)名患者渗透压间隙>30;11(20%)名患者渗透压间隙>40。
酒精性酮症酸中毒患者的渗透压间隙范围很大,通常达到与有毒性酒精中毒相关的值。该研究受到转录错误的潜在影响以及无法确定渗透压间隙原因的限制。
在这项回顾性研究中,酒精性酮症酸中毒患者的渗透压间隙中位数为 27。由于酒精性酮症酸中毒易于治疗且费用低廉,因此正确识别可能会避免针对有毒性酒精中毒的昂贵且有创的治疗。