Yahwak Jason A, Riker Richard R, Fraser Gilles L, Subak-Sharpe Sarah
Department of Medicine, Pulmonary-Critical Care Medicine, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME, USA.
Pharmacotherapy. 2008 Aug;28(8):984-91. doi: 10.1592/phco.28.8.984.
To determine a threshold dose for parenteral lorazepam when screening for propylene glycol toxicity with the osmol gap, and to characterize which osmol gap values are more predictive of toxic propylene glycol concentrations and resultant clinical toxicity.
Prospective, two-phase observational study.
Thirty-two bed, multidisciplinary intensive care unit.
Thirty-five adult patients receiving any dose of parenteral lorazepam (phase 1), and 14 patients receiving lorazepam in doses of 1 mg/kg/day or higher (phase 2).
Serum osmolality was measured every other day during lorazepam therapy, and the osmol gap (measured osmolality minus calculated osmolarity) was determined. A serum propylene glycol concentration was obtained when the osmol gap first exceeded 10. In phase 1, 35 patients were monitored for 186 patient-days. Ten patients (29%) developed an osmol gap greater than 10; only one (10%) of these patients had propylene glycol concentrations greater than 18 mg/dl. In phase 2, 14 patients received lorazepam at a median dose of 631 mg (interquartile range [IQR] 437-972 mg) over a median of 5.5 days (IQR 4-8.75 days). Nine patients (64%) had propylene glycol concentrations greater than 18 mg/dl; six (67%) of these nine developed transient acute kidney injury, metabolic acidosis, or both. The correlation between osmol gap and propylene glycol concentration was 0.44 (p=0.006). An osmol gap of 10 or greater had a likelihood ratio of 4.4 to predict a propylene glycol concentration greater than 18 mg/dl. An osmol gap of 12 or greater had a likelihood ratio of 2.7 to predict the development of possible propylene glycol clinical toxicity.
Screening for propylene glycol toxicity with the osmol gap may be helpful for patients receiving intravenous lorazepam in doses of 1 mg/kg/day or higher. An osmol gap of 10 or greater was predictive of elevated propylene glycol concentrations, and values of 12 or greater were predictive of clinical changes suggestive of propylene glycol toxicity.
确定在通过渗透压间隙筛查丙二醇毒性时静脉注射劳拉西泮的阈值剂量,并确定哪些渗透压间隙值更能预测丙二醇的毒性浓度及由此产生的临床毒性。
前瞻性、两阶段观察性研究。
拥有32张床位的多学科重症监护病房。
35例接受任何剂量静脉注射劳拉西泮的成年患者(第一阶段),以及14例接受剂量为1mg/kg/天或更高剂量劳拉西泮的患者(第二阶段)。
在劳拉西泮治疗期间每隔一天测量血清渗透压,并计算渗透压间隙(测量的渗透压减去计算的渗透压)。当渗透压间隙首次超过10时,检测血清丙二醇浓度。在第一阶段,35例患者接受了186个患者日的监测。10例患者(29%)的渗透压间隙大于10;其中只有1例(10%)患者的丙二醇浓度大于18mg/dl。在第二阶段,14例患者接受劳拉西泮治疗,中位剂量为631mg(四分位间距[IQR]437 - 972mg),中位治疗时间为5.5天(IQR 4 - 8.75天)。9例患者(64%)的丙二醇浓度大于18mg/dl;这9例患者中有6例(67%)出现短暂性急性肾损伤、代谢性酸中毒或两者兼有。渗透压间隙与丙二醇浓度之间的相关性为0.44(p = 0.006)。渗透压间隙为10或更高时,预测丙二醇浓度大于18mg/dl的似然比为4.4。渗透压间隙为12或更高时,预测可能出现丙二醇临床毒性的似然比为2.7。
对于接受剂量为1mg/kg/天或更高剂量静脉注射劳拉西泮的患者,通过渗透压间隙筛查丙二醇毒性可能会有帮助。渗透压间隙为10或更高可预测丙二醇浓度升高,而12或更高的值可预测提示丙二醇毒性的临床变化。