• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

埃塞俄比亚精神病筛查问卷的项目反应理论分析

An Item Response Theory Analysis of the Psychosis Screening Questionnaire in Ethiopia.

作者信息

Yared Mahlet, Kim Hannah H, Ametaj Amantia, Alemayehu Melkam, Stevenson Anne, Milkias Barkot, Girma Engida, Gelaye Bizu, Teferra Solomon

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Early Interv Psychiatry. 2025 Jan;19(1):e13609. doi: 10.1111/eip.13609. Epub 2024 Sep 2.

DOI:10.1111/eip.13609
PMID:39223760
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11729251/
Abstract

AIM

Few psychosis screening instruments have been tested for use in Africa, yet appropriate tools can increase the detection of self-reported psychotic symptoms, improve the detection of psychosis and impact its prognosis.

METHOD

The construct validity and factor structure of Psychosis Screening Questionnaire (PSQ) were tested with confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and item response theory (IRT) in a sample of 1928 Ethiopian adults without any history of psychosis. We tested a unidimensional model with and without an item on mania. For IRT, unidimensional latent structure one-parameter logistic (1PL) and two-parameter (2PL) logistic models were tested and compared for relative fit using a likelihood-ratio test.

RESULT AND DISCUSSION

The prevalence of lifetime positive screens was 2.8% in an Ethiopian sample of adults from a general medical setting. A unidimensional model demonstrated good fit for the PSQ, (CFI = 0.993, TLI = 0.986 and RMSEA = 0.025). For IRT, a 2PL model was the best fitting one. IRT tests of item difficulty and discrimination parameters showed that paranoia had the highest discrimination and lowest difficulty ( ), likely to be endorsed at low levels of psychotic features. Thought insertion had the highest item difficulty ( ). Overall, the measure captures the psychosis construct at higher levels of the latent trait and may be suited for detecting moderate to severe levels of psychosis.

CONCLUSION

The PSQ is found to have good construct validity in screening for psychosis among Ethiopian adults. Future studies may focus on the diagnostic validity of the PSQ comparing it with a structured clinical interview.

摘要

目的

很少有精神病筛查工具在非洲进行过测试,但合适的工具可以增加对自我报告的精神病症状的检测,提高精神病的检出率并影响其预后。

方法

在1928名无精神病病史的埃塞俄比亚成年人样本中,采用验证性因素分析(CFA)和项目反应理论(IRT)对精神病筛查问卷(PSQ)的结构效度和因素结构进行测试。我们测试了一个有和没有关于躁狂症项目的单维模型。对于IRT,测试了单维潜在结构单参数逻辑(1PL)和双参数(2PL)逻辑模型,并使用似然比检验比较了相对拟合度。

结果与讨论

在埃塞俄比亚一个普通医疗环境中的成年人样本中,终生阳性筛查的患病率为2.8%。一个单维模型显示对PSQ拟合良好(CFI = 0.993,TLI = 0.986,RMSEA = 0.025)。对于IRT,2PL模型是拟合最好的。项目难度和区分参数的IRT测试表明,偏执具有最高的区分度和最低的难度( ),在低水平的精神病特征下可能被认可。思维插入具有最高的项目难度( )。总体而言该测量方法在潜在特质的较高水平上捕捉到了精神病结构,可能适合检测中度至重度精神病。

结论

发现PSQ在埃塞俄比亚成年人精神病筛查中具有良好的结构效度。未来的研究可以将重点放在将PSQ与结构化临床访谈进行比较的诊断效度上。

相似文献

1
An Item Response Theory Analysis of the Psychosis Screening Questionnaire in Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚精神病筛查问卷的项目反应理论分析
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2025 Jan;19(1):e13609. doi: 10.1111/eip.13609. Epub 2024 Sep 2.
2
Factor structure of psychosis screening questionnaire in Ugandan adults.乌干达成年人精神病筛查问卷的因子结构。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Jan 9;24(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05485-2.
3
Construct Validity of the Psychosis Screening Questionnaire in Ugandan Adults.乌干达成年人精神病筛查问卷的结构效度
Res Sq. 2023 Jan 31:rs.3.rs-2482429. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2482429/v1.
4
Psychosis screening questionnaire: Exploring its factor structure among South African adults.精神病筛查问卷:探索其在南非成年人中的因素结构。
S Afr J Psychiatr. 2023 Nov 17;29:2051. doi: 10.4102/sajpsychiatry.v29i0.2051. eCollection 2023.
5
Cross-country variations in the reporting of psychotic symptoms among sub-Saharan African adults: A psychometric evaluation of the Psychosis Screening Questionnaire.撒哈拉以南非洲成年人中精神病症状报告的跨国差异:精神病筛查问卷的心理计量学评估。
J Affect Disord. 2022 May 1;304:85-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.02.048. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
6
Factor structure and item response of psychosis symptoms among Kenyan adults.肯尼亚成年人精神病症状的因子结构和项目反应。
J Affect Disord. 2022 Nov 15;317:136-141. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.08.038. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
7
The Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: development and validation amongst medical students and workers.中文版的感知压力问卷:医学生和医务人员的编制与验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Mar 13;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01307-1.
8
Psychometric properties of the mini international neuropsychiatric interview (MINI) psychosis module: a Sub-Saharan Africa cross country comparison.《迷你国际神经精神访谈(MINI)精神病模块的心理测量特性:撒哈拉以南非洲国家的跨国比较》。
Psychol Med. 2023 Nov;53(15):7042-7052. doi: 10.1017/S0033291723000296. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
9
Psychometric properties and factor structure of the General Health Questionnaire as a screening tool for anxiety and depressive symptoms in a multi-national study of young adults.在一项针对年轻人的多国研究中,作为焦虑和抑郁症状筛查工具的一般健康问卷的心理测量特性和因子结构。
J Affect Disord. 2015 Nov 15;187:197-202. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.08.045. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
10
The psychometric properties of the 16-item version of the Prodromal Questionnaire (PQ-16) as a screening instrument for perinatal psychosis.产前精神病筛查工具 16 项 Prodromal Questionnaire(PQ-16)的心理测量特性。
Arch Womens Ment Health. 2018 Oct;21(5):563-572. doi: 10.1007/s00737-018-0833-2. Epub 2018 Mar 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Mortality in people with schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of relative risk and aggravating or attenuating factors.精神分裂症患者的死亡率:相对风险以及加重或减轻因素的系统评价和荟萃分析
World Psychiatry. 2022 Jun;21(2):248-271. doi: 10.1002/wps.20994.
2
Cross-country variations in the reporting of psychotic symptoms among sub-Saharan African adults: A psychometric evaluation of the Psychosis Screening Questionnaire.撒哈拉以南非洲成年人中精神病症状报告的跨国差异:精神病筛查问卷的心理计量学评估。
J Affect Disord. 2022 May 1;304:85-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.02.048. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
3
Lifetime Prevalence and Correlates of Schizophrenia and Other Psychotic Disorders in Singapore.
新加坡精神分裂症及其他精神障碍的终生患病率及其相关因素
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Mar 11;12:650674. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.650674. eCollection 2021.
4
A Population-Based Cohort Study Examining the Incidence and Impact of Psychotic Experiences From Childhood to Adulthood, and Prediction of Psychotic Disorder.一项基于人群的队列研究,调查了从儿童期到成年期的精神病性体验的发生率和影响,以及精神病性障碍的预测。
Am J Psychiatry. 2020 Apr 1;177(4):308-317. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2019.19060654. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
5
Towards a public health approach to psychotic disorders.迈向针对精神障碍的公共卫生方法。
Lancet Public Health. 2019 May;4(5):e212-e213. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30054-4.
6
Neuropsychiatric Genetics of African Populations-Psychosis (NeuroGAP-Psychosis): a case-control study protocol and GWAS in Ethiopia, Kenya, South Africa and Uganda.非裔人群神经精神遗传学-精神病(NeuroGAP-精神病):在埃塞俄比亚、肯尼亚、南非和乌干达开展的病例对照研究方案和全基因组关联研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 19;9(2):e025469. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025469.
7
Prevalence of psychotic disorders and its association with methodological issues. A systematic review and meta-analyses.精神病性障碍的患病率及其与方法学问题的关系。系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 12;13(4):e0195687. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195687. eCollection 2018.
8
Investigating ethnic variations in reporting of psychotic symptoms: a multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis of the Psychosis Screening Questionnaire.探究精神病症状报告中的种族差异:精神病筛查问卷的多群组验证性因子分析。
Psychol Med. 2018 Dec;48(16):2757-2765. doi: 10.1017/S0033291718000399. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
9
Antipsychotic medication and long-term mortality risk in patients with schizophrenia; a systematic review and meta-analysis.抗精神病药物与精神分裂症患者的长期死亡风险:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Psychol Med. 2017 Oct;47(13):2217-2228. doi: 10.1017/S0033291717000873. Epub 2017 Apr 11.
10
Validated Screening Tools for Common Mental Disorders in Low and Middle Income Countries: A Systematic Review.低收入和中等收入国家常见精神障碍的有效筛查工具:一项系统评价
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 16;11(6):e0156939. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156939. eCollection 2016.