Suppr超能文献

探究精神病症状报告中的种族差异:精神病筛查问卷的多群组验证性因子分析。

Investigating ethnic variations in reporting of psychotic symptoms: a multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis of the Psychosis Screening Questionnaire.

机构信息

Centre for Academic Mental Health,Population Health Sciences,Bristol Medical School,University of Bristol,Oakfield House,Oakfield Grove,BS8 2BN Bristol,UK.

The Cathie Marsh Institute for Social Research (CMIST),School of Social Sciences,University of Manchester,Humanities Bridgeford Street Building,M13 9PL Manchester,UK.

出版信息

Psychol Med. 2018 Dec;48(16):2757-2765. doi: 10.1017/S0033291718000399. Epub 2018 Mar 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Epidemiological evidence suggests risk for psychosis varies with ethnicity in Western countries. However, there is little evidence to date on the cross-cultural validity of screening instruments used for such comparisons.

METHODS

Combining two existing UK population-based cohorts, we examined risk for reporting psychotic symptoms across White British (n = 3467), White Irish (n = 851), Caribbean (n = 1899), Indian (n = 2590), Pakistani (n = 1956) and Bangladeshi groups (n = 1248). We assessed the psychometric properties of the Psychosis Screening Questionnaire (PSQ) with a multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis, assessing the equivalence of factor loadings, response thresholds and residual variances in an analysis of measurement non-invariance.

RESULTS

Compared with prevalence among British Whites (5.4%), the prevalence of self-reported psychotic symptoms was greater in the Caribbean group (12.7%, adjusted OR = 2.38 [95% CI 1.84-3.07]). Prevalence was also increased among Pakistani individuals (8.3%, adjusted OR = 1.36 [1.01-1.84]) although this difference was driven by a greater likelihood of reporting paranoid symptoms. PSQ items for thought interference, strange experience and hallucination were measured in equivalent ways across ethnic groups. However, our measurement models suggested that paranoid symptoms were measured less reliably among ethnic minorities than among British Whites and appeared to exaggerate latent differences between Pakistani and White British groups when measurement non-invariance was not accounted for.

CONCLUSIONS

Notwithstanding evidence for measurement non-invariance, the greater risk for reporting psychotic symptoms among Caribbean individuals is unlikely to be an artefact of measurement. Greater residual variance in the recording of paranoid symptoms among ethnic minority respondents warrants caution in using this item to investigate ethnic variation in psychosis risk.

摘要

背景

流行病学证据表明,西方国家的精神病风险因种族而异。然而,迄今为止,关于用于此类比较的筛查工具的跨文化有效性的证据很少。

方法

我们结合了两个现有的英国基于人群的队列,研究了白种英国人(n=3467)、白种爱尔兰人(n=851)、加勒比人(n=1899)、印度人(n=2590)、巴基斯坦人(n=1956)和孟加拉人(n=1248)报告精神病症状的风险。我们使用多组验证性因素分析评估了精神病筛查问卷(PSQ)的心理计量学特性,在测量不变性分析中评估了因子负荷、反应阈值和残差方差的等效性。

结果

与英国白人的患病率(5.4%)相比,加勒比群体的自我报告精神病症状患病率更高(12.7%,调整后的优势比=2.38[95%置信区间 1.84-3.07])。巴基斯坦人(8.3%,调整后的优势比=1.36[1.01-1.84])的患病率也有所增加,但这一差异是由于更有可能报告偏执症状所致。思想干扰、奇怪经历和幻觉的 PSQ 项目在不同种族群体中的测量方式相同。然而,我们的测量模型表明,与英国白人相比,少数民族群体中偏执症状的测量可靠性较低,并且在不考虑测量不变性时,似乎夸大了巴基斯坦人和英国白人之间潜在差异。

结论

尽管存在测量不变性的证据,但加勒比人报告精神病症状的风险较高不太可能是测量的人为因素。少数民族受访者在记录偏执症状方面的残余方差较大,因此在使用该项目调查精神病风险的种族差异时应谨慎。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验