• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成人髋关节创伤性脱位而无髋臼或股骨骨折:英国一家主要创伤中心的回顾性研究报告临床和影像学结果。

Traumatic native hip dislocation in the absence of acetabular or femoral fracture in adults: a retrospective study reporting clinical and radiological outcomes from a major trauma centre in the United Kingdom.

机构信息

North Bristol NHS Trust, Westbury on Trym, Bristol, UK.

出版信息

Hip Int. 2024 Sep;34(5):652-659. doi: 10.1177/11207000241267709. Epub 2024 Sep 2.

DOI:10.1177/11207000241267709
PMID:39223845
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Posterior native hip dislocations (NHD) are high-energy injuries. Thompson-Epstein Type I dislocations describe those without significant associated femoral or acetabular fracture. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients with Type I NHDs. We also evaluate the association between radiological indicators of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and NHD.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective study from January 2012 to May 2021 compared skeletally mature patients (⩾16 years) with Type I posterior NHD to age and gender-matched controls with Type II-V posterior NHD. Patient demographics, mechanism of injury, complications and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are presented. Post reduction radiographs and computed tomography were used to assess for FAI. Univariate analyses were performed to evaluate radiological outcomes.

RESULTS

13 patients (77% male) with Type I posterior NHD were compared to a control group of 40 patients (80% male) with Type II-V posterior NHD. 11 patients in the study group and 14 in the control group experienced isolated injuries ( = 0.01). Post-reduction complications were similar. The study group had significantly lower post-injury osteoarthritis incidence ( = 0) compared to controls ( = 18,  = 0.0083). Patients reported a mean Oxford Hip Score of 43.5 ± 2.2 and EQ-5D-VAS score of 87.1 ± 7.4, with 6 patients indicating minimal symptoms across all EQ-5D-5L domains. Radiological femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) was prevalent in both groups, especially among males.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who underwent emergent closed reduction of Type I NHD demonstrated good short to medium term outcomes. Our radiological findings suggest a high prevalence of FAI. Future work should aim to quantify longer term outcomes following this injury. We call for further comparative studies of patients who suffer NHD with and without fractures to aid our understanding of risk factors. Given the rarity of this injury, multicentre efforts will be required to capture large numbers of patients.

摘要

简介

髋关节后脱位(NHD)是高能损伤。Thompson-Epstein Ⅰ型脱位是指无明显股骨或髋臼骨折的髋关节后脱位。本研究旨在比较Ⅰ型 NHD 患者的临床和影像学结果。我们还评估了髋关节撞击症(FAI)的影像学指标与 NHD 的关系。

患者和方法

2012 年 1 月至 2021 年 5 月的一项回顾性研究比较了Ⅰ型后 NHD 的骨骼成熟患者(≥16 岁)与年龄和性别匹配的Ⅱ-Ⅴ型后 NHD 对照组。介绍了患者的人口统计学资料、损伤机制、并发症和患者报告的结果测量(PROM)。使用复位后 X 线片和 CT 评估 FAI。进行单变量分析以评估影像学结果。

结果

13 例(77%为男性)Ⅰ型后 NHD 患者与 40 例(80%为男性)Ⅱ-Ⅴ型后 NHD 对照组进行比较。研究组中有 11 例,对照组中有 14 例为单纯损伤( = 0.01)。复位后并发症相似。研究组的术后创伤性骨关节炎发生率( = 0)明显低于对照组( = 18, = 0.0083)。患者报告的牛津髋关节评分平均为 43.5 ± 2.2,EQ-5D-VAS 评分为 87.1 ± 7.4,6 例患者在所有 EQ-5D-5L 领域的症状均为轻度。两组均存在髋关节撞击症(FAI),尤其是男性。

结论

接受Ⅰ型 NHD 急诊闭合复位的患者表现出良好的短期至中期结果。我们的影像学发现表明 FAI 发生率较高。未来的工作应旨在量化这种损伤后的长期结果。我们呼吁进一步比较无骨折和有骨折的 NHD 患者的研究,以帮助我们了解危险因素。鉴于这种损伤的罕见性,需要多中心努力才能捕获大量患者。

相似文献

1
Traumatic native hip dislocation in the absence of acetabular or femoral fracture in adults: a retrospective study reporting clinical and radiological outcomes from a major trauma centre in the United Kingdom.成人髋关节创伤性脱位而无髋臼或股骨骨折:英国一家主要创伤中心的回顾性研究报告临床和影像学结果。
Hip Int. 2024 Sep;34(5):652-659. doi: 10.1177/11207000241267709. Epub 2024 Sep 2.
2
Femoroacetabular Variations Are Predisposing Factors for Traumatic Posterior Hip Dislocation.股髋臼变异是创伤性髋关节后脱位的易患因素。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2024 Jun 5;106(11):1000-1007. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.23.00905. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
3
Femoroacetabular Impingement Is Associated With Sports-Related Posterior Hip Instability in Adolescents: A Matched-Cohort Study.股骨髋臼撞击症与青少年运动相关的髋关节后脱位有关:一项配对队列研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2016 Sep;44(9):2299-303. doi: 10.1177/0363546516651119. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
4
Femoroacetabular impingement predisposes to traumatic posterior hip dislocation.髋关节撞击综合征可导致创伤性髋关节后脱位。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Jun;471(6):1937-43. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-2863-4. Epub 2013 Feb 20.
5
Can the Femoro-Epiphyseal Acetabular Roof (FEAR) Index Be Used to Distinguish Dysplasia from Impingement?股骨骺髋臼顶(FEAR)指数能否用于区分发育不良与撞击?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 May 1;479(5):962-971. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001610.
6
The Pattern of Acetabular Cartilage Wear Is Hip Morphology-dependent and Patient Demographic-dependent.髋臼软骨磨损模式与髋关节形态和患者人口统计学特征有关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 May;477(5):1021-1033. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000649.
7
Acetabular Retroversion and Decreased Posterior Coverage Are Associated With Sports-related Posterior Hip Dislocation in Adolescents.髋臼后倾和后覆盖减少与青少年运动相关性髋关节后脱位有关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 May;477(5):1101-1108. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000514.
8
Traumatic hip dislocation at a regional trauma centre in Nigeria.尼日利亚某地区创伤中心的创伤性髋关节脱位
Niger J Med. 2011 Jan-Mar;20(1):124-30.
9
Danish Hip Arthroscopy Registry: predictors of outcome in patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI).丹麦髋关节镜登记处:股骨髋臼撞击症(FAI)患者的结局预测因素。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Oct;27(10):3110-3120. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-4941-3. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
10
Surgical Hip Dislocation in the Era of Hip Arthroscopy Demonstrates High Survivorship and Improvements in Patient-reported Outcomes for Complex Femoroacetabular Impingement.关节镜时代的髋关节脱位手术具有高存活率,并改善了复杂型股骨髋臼撞击症患者的报告结局。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1671-1682. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003032. Epub 2024 Mar 21.