Suppr超能文献

重症监护病房收治标准:一项范围综述

Intensive care unit admission criteria: a scoping review.

作者信息

Soares James, Leung Catherine, Campbell Victoria, Van Der Vegt Anton, Malycha James, Andersen Christopher

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Sunshine Coast, QLD, Australia.

出版信息

J Intensive Care Soc. 2024 Apr 15;25(3):296-307. doi: 10.1177/17511437241246901. eCollection 2024 Aug.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Effectively identifying deteriorated patients is vital to the development and validation of automated systems designed to predict clinical deterioration. Existing outcome measures used for this purpose have significant limitations. Published criteria for admission to high acuity inpatient areas may represent markers of patient deterioration and could inform the development of alternate outcome measures.

OBJECTIVES

In this scoping review, we aimed to characterise published criteria for admission of adult inpatients to high acuity inpatient areas including intensive care units. A secondary aim was to identify variables that are extractable from electronic health records (EHRs).

DATA SOURCES

Electronic databases and were searched to identify papers published from 1999 to date of search. We included publications which described prescriptive criteria for admission of adult inpatients to a clinical area with a higher level of care than a general hospital ward.

CHARTING METHODS

Data was extracted from each publication using a standardised data-charting form. Admission criteria characteristics were summarised and cross-tabulated for each criterion by population group.

RESULTS

Five domains were identified: diagnosis-based criteria, clinical parameter criteria, organ-support criteria, organ-monitoring criteria and patient baseline criteria. Six clinical parameter-based criteria and five needs-based criteria were frequently proposed and represent variables extractable from EHRs. Thresholds for objective clinical parameter criteria varied across publications, and by disease subgroup, and universal cut-offs for criteria could not be elucidated.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified multiple criteria which may represent markers of deterioration. Many of the criteria are extractable from the EHR, making them potential candidates for future automated systems. Variability in admission criteria and associated thresholds across the literature suggests clinical deterioration is a heterogeneous phenomenon which may resist being defined as a single entity via a consensus-driven process.

摘要

背景

有效识别病情恶化的患者对于旨在预测临床恶化的自动化系统的开发和验证至关重要。用于此目的的现有结果指标存在重大局限性。已公布的入住高 acuity 住院区域的标准可能代表患者病情恶化的标志,并可为替代结果指标的开发提供参考。

目的

在本范围综述中,我们旨在描述已公布的成人住院患者入住包括重症监护病房在内的高 acuity 住院区域的标准。次要目的是识别可从电子健康记录(EHR)中提取的变量。

数据来源

检索电子数据库以识别 1999 年至检索日期发表的论文。我们纳入了描述成人住院患者入住比普通医院病房护理水平更高的临床区域的规定标准的出版物。

图表绘制方法

使用标准化数据图表形式从每个出版物中提取数据。按人群组对每个标准的入院标准特征进行总结和交叉制表。

结果

确定了五个领域:基于诊断的标准、临床参数标准、器官支持标准、器官监测标准和患者基线标准。经常提出六项基于临床参数的标准和五项基于需求的标准,并代表可从 EHRs 中提取的变量。客观临床参数标准的阈值因出版物和疾病亚组而异,无法阐明标准的通用临界值。

结论

本研究确定了多个可能代表病情恶化标志的标准。许多标准可从 EHR 中提取,使其成为未来自动化系统的潜在候选标准。文献中入院标准及其相关阈值的变异性表明临床恶化是一种异质性现象,可能难以通过共识驱动的过程定义为单一实体。

相似文献

1
Intensive care unit admission criteria: a scoping review.重症监护病房收治标准:一项范围综述
J Intensive Care Soc. 2024 Apr 15;25(3):296-307. doi: 10.1177/17511437241246901. eCollection 2024 Aug.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验