Suppr超能文献

医疗保健利益相关者对杜氏肌营养不良症疗法价值评估方法的看法。

Healthcare Stakeholder Perspectives on a Value Assessment Approach for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Therapies.

作者信息

Fischer Ryan, Furlong Pat, Kennedy Annie, Maynard Kelly, Penrod Marissa, Miller Debra, Laverty Chamindra G, Lowes Linda P, Kuntz Nancy L, Shieh Perry B, Kondejewski Jane, Neumann Peter J, Shafrin Jason, Willke Richard J

机构信息

Parent Project Muscular Dystrophy, Washington, DC, USA.

EveryLife Foundation for Rare Diseases, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024 Aug 29;17:4199-4212. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S458181. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Traditional value assessment frameworks are challenged in comprehensively assessing the societal value new therapies bring to individuals with rare, progressive, genetic, fatal, neuromuscular diseases such as Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). The objective of this study was to identify how value assessment frameworks may need to be adapted to measure the value to society of DMD therapies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Three stakeholder groups (6 patient advocates, 4 clinicians, 3 health economists; N = 13) participated in semi-structured interviews around the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research's Value Flower, which includes elements to consider within value assessments of healthcare technologies.

RESULTS

All stakeholders agreed that traditional value assessment frameworks based on the quality-adjusted life year (QALY) are narrow and will undervalue new DMD therapies. All stakeholders expressed some level of concern that using the QALY as a key metric of value discriminates against patients with severe progressive diseases and disabilities. Some stakeholders saw value in using the QALY for cross-disease comparisons in resource-constrained environments if the methodology was appropriate. All stakeholders recommended considering additional elements of value in decision-making around new DMD therapies. These elements reflect: economic and humanistic costs incurred by patients, caregivers, and families with Duchenne, such as indirect out-of-pocket costs, lost productivity, and family spillovers; meaningful attributes for individuals with disabilities and high unmet need, such as severity of disease, value of hope, and real option value; and factors that contribute to improvements in population health, such as insurance value, equity, and scientific spillovers.

CONCLUSION

These findings highlight the need to expand traditional value assessment frameworks and take a holistic approach that incorporates the perspectives of individuals with Duchenne, caregivers, clinicians, and health economists when assessing the societal value of new DMD therapies. Broadening value assessment will prevent restricted or delayed access to therapies for individuals with Duchenne.

摘要

目的

传统的价值评估框架在全面评估新疗法给患有罕见、进行性、遗传性、致命性神经肌肉疾病(如杜氏肌营养不良症,DMD)的个体带来的社会价值方面面临挑战。本研究的目的是确定价值评估框架可能需要如何调整,以衡量DMD疗法对社会的价值。

患者与方法

三个利益相关者群体(6名患者倡导者、4名临床医生、3名卫生经济学家;共13人)围绕国际药物经济学与成果研究协会的价值之花参与了半结构化访谈,该价值之花包含了医疗技术价值评估中需考虑的要素。

结果

所有利益相关者都认为,基于质量调整生命年(QALY)的传统价值评估框架过于狭隘,会低估新的DMD疗法的价值。所有利益相关者都表达了一定程度的担忧,即使用QALY作为价值的关键指标会歧视患有严重进行性疾病和残疾的患者。一些利益相关者认为,如果方法得当,在资源有限的环境中使用QALY进行跨疾病比较具有价值。所有利益相关者都建议在围绕新的DMD疗法的决策中考虑其他价值要素。这些要素包括:杜氏患者、护理人员和家庭所产生的经济和人文成本,如间接自付费用、生产力损失和家庭溢出效应;残疾且需求未得到满足的个体的有意义属性,如疾病严重程度、希望的价值和实物期权价值;以及有助于改善人群健康的因素,如保险价值、公平性和科学溢出效应。

结论

这些发现凸显了扩大传统价值评估框架并采取整体方法的必要性,即在评估新的DMD疗法的社会价值时纳入杜氏患者、护理人员、临床医生和卫生经济学家的观点。拓宽价值评估将防止杜氏患者获得治疗的机会受到限制或延迟。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4ad/11368110/03d1ff14ce99/JMDH-17-4199-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验