Huang Jianv, Li Jiacong, He Lu, Miao Junyan, Zhu Meng, Dai Juncheng, Jin Guangfu, Ma Hongxia, Hang Dong, Shen Hongbing
Department of Epidemiology, Center for Global Health, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China.
Jiangsu Key Lab of Cancer Biomarkers, Prevention and Treatment, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Personalized Medicine, School of Public Health, Gusu School, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211166, China.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2025 May 19;110(6):e1992-e2000. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgae609.
Fatty acids (FAs) have emerged as significant contributors to tumorigenesis, yet prospective evidence regarding their specific effects on lung cancer risk remains scarce.
To investigate the association between plasma FAs and lung cancer incidence, as well as a potential modification effect of genetic susceptibility on lung cancer risk.
A cohort study was conducted involving 112 547 cancer-free participants from the UK Biobank, with measurements of plasma FAs, including saturated fatty acids (SFAs), monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs), and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), at baseline (2006-2010). Cox regression models were employed to assess lung cancer risk according to plasma FA quartiles or 1-SD increments. Furthermore, interaction between plasma FAs and polygenic risk score was evaluated using an additive model.
Over an average 10.9-year follow-up, 1122 lung cancer cases occurred. After multivariable adjustment, MUFAs were positively associated with lung cancer risk (hazard ratio [HR] per 1-SD = 1.32; 95% CI, 1.13-1.54). In contrast, PUFAs, particularly n-3 PUFAs, n-6 PUFAs, docosahexaenoic acid, and linoleic acid, were associated with a lower risk of lung cancer, with HRs ranging from 0.79 (95% CI, 0.72-0.87) to 0.89 (95% CI, 0.83-0.95). SFAs were not significantly associated with lung cancer risk. Moreover, we observed an additive interaction between plasma PUFAs and genetic risk. Individuals with a high genetic risk and the lowest quartile of plasma PUFAs had the highest risk of lung cancer (HR = 2.20, 95% CI, 1.43-3.38).
Our findings suggest that plasma PUFAs may serve as protective factors, while MUFAs represent risk factors for lung cancer, offering novel insights into lung cancer carcinogenesis and prevention.
脂肪酸(FAs)已成为肿瘤发生的重要因素,但关于其对肺癌风险的具体影响的前瞻性证据仍然稀缺。
研究血浆脂肪酸与肺癌发病率之间的关联,以及遗传易感性对肺癌风险的潜在修饰作用。
对英国生物银行的112547名无癌参与者进行队列研究,在基线时(2006 - 2010年)测量血浆脂肪酸,包括饱和脂肪酸(SFAs)、单不饱和脂肪酸(MUFAs)和多不饱和脂肪酸(PUFAs)。采用Cox回归模型根据血浆脂肪酸四分位数或1个标准差增量评估肺癌风险。此外,使用加法模型评估血浆脂肪酸与多基因风险评分之间的相互作用。
在平均10.9年的随访期间,发生了1122例肺癌病例。多变量调整后,单不饱和脂肪酸与肺癌风险呈正相关(每1个标准差的风险比[HR]=1.32;95%置信区间,1.13 - 1.54)。相比之下,多不饱和脂肪酸,特别是n - 3多不饱和脂肪酸、n - 6多不饱和脂肪酸、二十二碳六烯酸和亚油酸,与较低的肺癌风险相关,风险比范围为0.79(95%置信区间,0.72 - 0.87)至0.89(95%置信区间,0.83 - 0.95)。饱和脂肪酸与肺癌风险无显著关联。此外,我们观察到血浆多不饱和脂肪酸与遗传风险之间存在相加相互作用。遗传风险高且血浆多不饱和脂肪酸处于最低四分位数的个体患肺癌的风险最高(HR = 2.20,95%置信区间,1.43 - 3.38)。
我们的研究结果表明,血浆多不饱和脂肪酸可能是保护因素,而单不饱和脂肪酸是肺癌的危险因素,为肺癌的致癌机制和预防提供了新的见解。