• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

墨西哥首次产前保健就诊的护理能力和产妇体验的综合评估:来自观察性队列研究基线调查的见解。

A comprehensive assessment of care competence and maternal experience of first antenatal care visits in Mexico: Insights from the baseline survey of an observational cohort study.

机构信息

Unidad de Investigación Epidemiológica y Servicios de Salud del CMN SXXI, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Ciudad de México, México.

Dirección de Prestaciones Médicas, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Ciudad de México, México.

出版信息

PLoS Med. 2024 Sep 3;21(9):e1004456. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004456. eCollection 2024 Sep.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.1004456
PMID:39226243
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11371229/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Comprehensive antenatal care (ANC) must prioritize competent, evidence-based medical attention to ensure a positive experience and value for its users. Unfortunately, there is scarce evidence of implementing this holistic approach to ANC in low- and middle-income countries, leading to gaps in quality and accountability. This study assessed care competence, women's experiences during the first ANC visit, and the factors associated with these care attributes.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

The study analyzed cross-sectional baseline data from the maternal eCohort study conducted in Mexico from August to December 2023. The study adapted the Quality Evidence for Health System Transformation (QuEST) network questionnaires to the Mexican context and validated them through expert group and cognitive interviews with women. Pregnant women aged 18 to 49 who had their first ANC visit with a family physician were enrolled in 48 primary clinics of the Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social across 8 states. Care competence and women's experiences with care were the primary outcomes. The statistical analysis comprised descriptive statistics, multivariable linear and Poisson regressions. A total of 1,390 pregnant women were included in the study. During their first ANC visit, women received only 67.7% of necessary clinical actions on average, and 52% rated their ANC experience as fair or poor. Women with previous pregnancies (adjusted regression coefficient [aCoef.] -3.55; (95% confidence intervals [95% CIs]): -4.88, -2.22, p < 0.001), at risk of depression (aCoef. -3.02; 95% CIs: -5.61, -0.43, p = 0.023), those with warning signs (aCoef. -2.84; 95% CIs: -4.65, -1.03, p = 0.003), common pregnancy discomforts (aCoef. -1.91; 95% CIs: -3.81, -0.02, p = 0.048), or those who had a visit duration of less than 20 minutes (<15 minutes: aCoef. -7.58; 95% CIs: -10.21, -4.95, p < 0.001 and 15 to 19 minutes: aCoef. -2.73; 95% CIs: -4.79, -0.67, p = 0.010) and received ANC in the West and Southeast regions (aCoef. -5.15; 95% CIs: -7.64, -2.66, p < 0.001 and aCoef. -5.33; 95% CIs: -7.85, -2.82, p < 0.001, respectively) had a higher probability of experiencing poorer care competence. Higher care competence (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] 1.004; 95% CIs:1.002, 1.005, p < 0.001) and receiving care in a small clinic (aPR 1.19; 95% CIs: 1.06, 1.34, p = 0.003) compared to a medium-sized clinic were associated with a better first ANC visit experience, while common pregnancy discomforts (aPR 0.94; 95% CIs: 0.89, 0.98, p = 0.005) and shorter visit length (aPR 0.94; 95% CIs: 0.88, 0.99, p = 0.039) were associated with lower women's experience. The primary limitation of the study is that participants' responses may be influenced by social desirability bias, leading them to provide socially acceptable responses.

CONCLUSIONS

We found important gaps in adherence to ANC standards and that care competence during the first ANC visit is an important predictor of positive user experience. To inform quality improvement efforts, IMSS should institutionalize the routine monitoring of ANC competencies and ANC user experience. This will help identify poorly performing facilities and providers and address gaps in the provision of evidence-based and women-centered care.

摘要

背景

全面产前护理 (ANC) 必须优先提供有能力、基于证据的医疗服务,以确保其用户获得积极的体验和价值。然而,在中低收入国家,实施这种整体方法来提供 ANC 的证据很少,导致在质量和问责制方面存在差距。本研究评估了护理能力、妇女在首次 ANC 就诊期间的体验以及与这些护理属性相关的因素。

方法和发现

这项研究分析了 2023 年 8 月至 12 月在墨西哥进行的孕产妇电子队列研究的横断面基线数据。该研究适应了质量证据用于卫生系统转型 (QuEST) 网络问卷墨西哥的情况,并通过专家小组和对妇女的认知访谈进行了验证。在 8 个州的 48 个初级诊所,招募了年龄在 18 至 49 岁之间、首次接受家庭医生 ANC 就诊的孕妇。护理能力和妇女对护理的体验是主要的结果。统计分析包括描述性统计、多变量线性和泊松回归。共有 1390 名孕妇参与了这项研究。在她们的首次 ANC 就诊期间,妇女平均只接受了必要临床操作的 67.7%,并且 52%的妇女对 ANC 的体验评价为一般或较差。有过妊娠史的妇女(调整后的回归系数[aCoef.]-3.55;95%置信区间[95%CI]:-4.88,-2.22,p<0.001)、有抑郁风险的妇女(aCoef.-3.02;95%CI:-5.61,-0.43,p=0.023)、有警告信号的妇女(aCoef.-2.84;95%CI:-4.65,-1.03,p=0.003)、有常见妊娠不适的妇女(aCoef.-1.91;95%CI:-3.81,-0.02,p=0.048)、就诊时间少于 20 分钟的妇女(<15 分钟:aCoef.-7.58;95%CI:-10.21,-4.95,p<0.001;15 至 19 分钟:aCoef.-2.73;95%CI:-4.79,-0.67,p=0.010)以及在西部地区和东南部地区接受 ANC 的妇女(aCoef.-5.15;95%CI:-7.64,-2.66,p<0.001 和 aCoef.-5.33;95%CI:-7.85,-2.82,p<0.001)更有可能经历较差的护理能力。更高的护理能力(调整后患病率比[aPR]1.004;95%CI:1.002,1.005,p<0.001)和在小诊所接受护理(aPR 1.19;95%CI:1.06,1.34,p=0.003)与更好的首次 ANC 就诊体验相关,而常见妊娠不适(aPR 0.94;95%CI:0.89,0.98,p=0.005)和较短的就诊时间(aPR 0.94;95%CI:0.88,0.99,p=0.039)与妇女体验较低相关。该研究的主要限制是参与者的反应可能受到社会期望偏差的影响,导致他们提供社会可接受的反应。

结论

我们发现 ANC 标准的遵守存在重要差距,并且首次 ANC 就诊期间的护理能力是积极用户体验的重要预测因素。为了为质量改进工作提供信息,IMSS 应将 ANC 能力和 ANC 用户体验的常规监测制度化。这将有助于识别表现不佳的设施和提供者,并解决提供基于证据和以妇女为中心的护理方面的差距。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61b8/11371229/84f7dce7a4f9/pmed.1004456.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61b8/11371229/84f7dce7a4f9/pmed.1004456.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61b8/11371229/84f7dce7a4f9/pmed.1004456.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
A comprehensive assessment of care competence and maternal experience of first antenatal care visits in Mexico: Insights from the baseline survey of an observational cohort study.墨西哥首次产前保健就诊的护理能力和产妇体验的综合评估:来自观察性队列研究基线调查的见解。
PLoS Med. 2024 Sep 3;21(9):e1004456. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004456. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Provision and uptake of routine antenatal services: a qualitative evidence synthesis.常规产前服务的提供与接受情况:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 12;6(6):CD012392. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012392.pub2.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
High coverage but low quality of maternal and newborn health services in the coverage cascade: who is benefitted and left behind in accessing better quality health services in Nepal?在覆盖范围的传递过程中,孕产妇和新生儿健康服务的高覆盖率与低质量:在尼泊尔,谁受益于获得更高质量的卫生服务,而谁又被甩在后面?
Reprod Health. 2022 Jul 19;19(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01465-z.
5
Antenatal care quality and detection of risk among pregnant women: An observational study in Ethiopia, India, Kenya, and South Africa.产前保健质量和孕妇风险检测:在埃塞俄比亚、印度、肯尼亚和南非开展的一项观察性研究。
PLoS Med. 2024 Aug 27;21(8):e1004446. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004446. eCollection 2024 Aug.
6
Determinants of optimal antenatal care visit among pregnant women in Ethiopia: a multilevel analysis of Ethiopian mini demographic health survey 2019 data.影响埃塞俄比亚孕妇接受最佳产前护理的因素:基于 2019 年埃塞俄比亚迷你人口与健康调查数据的多水平分析。
Reprod Health. 2022 Mar 5;19(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01365-2.
7
Health system and community level interventions for improving antenatal care coverage and health outcomes.改善产前保健覆盖率和健康结局的卫生系统及社区层面干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 1;2015(12):CD010994. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010994.pub2.
8
Temporal relationship between Women's empowerment and utilization of antenatal care services: lessons from four National Surveys in sub-Saharan Africa.妇女赋权与产前保健服务利用之间的时间关系:来自撒哈拉以南非洲四项全国性调查的经验教训。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Mar 10;21(1):198. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-03679-8.
9
Uptake of antenatal care in high HIV-prevalence settings: Results from three population-based surveys in South Africa.高艾滋病毒流行地区的产前保健利用率:来自南非三项基于人群的调查结果。
S Afr Med J. 2020 Jul 7;110(7):671-677. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2020.v110i7.14325.
10
Trend change in delayed first antenatal care visit among reproductive-aged women in Ethiopia: multivariate decomposition analysis.趋势变化:埃塞俄比亚育龄妇女延迟首次产前保健就诊的情况:多变量分解分析。
Reprod Health. 2022 Mar 28;19(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01373-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality of postnatal care for mothers and neonates in Mexico: Insights from the maternal eCohort study.墨西哥母亲和新生儿产后护理质量:来自孕产妇电子队列研究的见解。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 12;20(8):e0323039. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323039. eCollection 2025.
2
Assessing the quality of childbirth care in Mexico: findings from the maternal eCohort.评估墨西哥分娩护理质量:来自孕产妇电子队列的研究结果
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Apr 16;25(1):455. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07397-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Users' perception of quality as a driver of private healthcare use in Mexico: Insights from the People's Voice Survey.用户对质量的感知是推动墨西哥私立医疗保健服务使用的因素:来自“人民之声”调查的见解。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 25;19(6):e0306179. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306179. eCollection 2024.
2
Practice list size, workforce composition and performance in English general practice: a latent profile analysis.英国普通实践中的实践清单大小、劳动力构成和绩效:潜在剖面分析。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Jun 11;25(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02462-w.
3
Pregnant women's satisfaction with the quality of antenatal care and the continued willingness to use health facility care in Lusaka district, Zambia.
赞比亚卢萨卡地区孕妇对产前保健质量的满意度及其持续使用医疗机构保健服务的意愿。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Jan 2;24(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-06181-5.
4
Adequacy of prenatal care and associated factors in the State of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.巴西南里奥格兰德州产前保健的充分性及其相关因素。
Rev Saude Publica. 2023 Oct 20;57:68. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2023057005146. eCollection 2023.
5
A Comprehensive Review of Intimate Partner Violence During Pregnancy and Its Adverse Effects on Maternal and Fetal Health.孕期亲密伴侣暴力及其对母婴健康的不良影响综述
Cureus. 2023 May 20;15(5):e39262. doi: 10.7759/cureus.39262. eCollection 2023 May.
6
Knowledge of danger signs of pregnancy and health-seeking action among pregnant women: a health facility-based cross-sectional study.孕妇对妊娠危险信号的认知及寻求医疗行为:一项基于医疗机构的横断面研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023 Apr 11;85(5):1722-1730. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000000610. eCollection 2023 May.
7
Pregnant woman awareness of obstetric danger signs in developing country: systematic review.发展中国家孕妇对产科危险信号的认知:系统评价。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 May 16;23(1):357. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05674-7.
8
Barriers and enablers to implementing clinical practice guidelines in primary care: an overview of systematic reviews.实施初级保健临床实践指南的障碍和促进因素:系统评价概述。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jan 6;13(1):e062158. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062158.
9
Overcoming disruptions in essential health services during the COVID-19 pandemic in Mexico.在墨西哥应对2019冠状病毒病疫情期间基本医疗卫生服务的中断问题。
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Mar;7(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-008099.
10
Untreated Depression During Pregnancy and Its Effect on Pregnancy Outcomes: A Systematic Review.孕期未经治疗的抑郁症及其对妊娠结局的影响:一项系统评价。
Cureus. 2021 Aug 17;13(8):e17251. doi: 10.7759/cureus.17251. eCollection 2021 Aug.