Choi Gyu-Seog, Kim Hye Jin
Colorectal Cancer Center, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
Ann Coloproctol. 2024 Aug;40(4):363-374. doi: 10.3393/ac.2024.00521.0074. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
Metastatic lateral pelvic lymph nodes (LPNs) in rectal cancer significantly impact the prognosis and treatment strategies. Western practices emphasize neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT), whereas Eastern approaches often rely on LPN dissection (LPND). This review examines the evolving role of LPND in the context of modern treatments, including total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), and the impact of CRT on the management of clinically suspicious LPNs. We comprehensively reviewed the key literature comparing the outcomes of LPND versus preoperative CRT for rectal cancer, focusing on recent advancements and ongoing debates. Key studies, including the JCOG0212 trial and recent multicenter trials, were analyzed to assess the efficacy of LPND, particularly in conjunction with preoperative CRT or TNT. Current evidence indicates that LPND can reduce local recurrence rates compared to total mesorectal excision alone in patients not receiving radiation therapy. However, the benefit of LPND in the context of neoadjuvant CRT is influenced by the size and pretreatment characteristics of LPNs. While CRT can effectively control smaller metastatic LPNs, larger or clinically suspicious LPNs may require LPND for optimal outcomes. Advances in surgical techniques, such as robotic-assisted LPND, offer potential benefits but also present challenges and complications. The role of TNT in controlling metastatic LPNs and improving patient outcomes is emerging but remains underexplored. The decision to perform LPND should be individualized based on patient-specific factors, including LPN size, response to neoadjuvant treatment, and surgeon expertise. Future research should focus on optimizing treatment protocols and further evaluating the role of TNT in managing metastatic LPNs.
直肠癌的侧方盆腔淋巴结转移对预后和治疗策略有显著影响。西方的治疗方法强调新辅助放化疗(CRT),而东方的方法通常依赖于侧方盆腔淋巴结清扫术(LPND)。本综述探讨了LPND在包括全新辅助治疗(TNT)在内的现代治疗背景下不断演变的作用,以及CRT对临床可疑侧方盆腔淋巴结管理的影响。我们全面回顾了比较LPND与直肠癌术前CRT疗效的关键文献,重点关注近期进展和持续争论。分析了包括JCOG0212试验和近期多中心试验在内的关键研究,以评估LPND的疗效,特别是与术前CRT或TNT联合使用时的疗效。目前的证据表明,在未接受放疗的患者中,与单纯直肠系膜全切除术相比,LPND可降低局部复发率。然而,在新辅助CRT背景下,LPND的益处受侧方盆腔淋巴结大小和治疗前特征的影响。虽然CRT可以有效控制较小的转移性侧方盆腔淋巴结,但较大或临床可疑的侧方盆腔淋巴结可能需要LPND才能获得最佳疗效。手术技术的进步,如机器人辅助LPND,带来了潜在益处,但也带来了挑战和并发症。TNT在控制转移性侧方盆腔淋巴结和改善患者预后方面的作用正在显现,但仍未得到充分探索。是否进行LPND应根据患者的具体因素个体化决定,包括侧方盆腔淋巴结大小、对新辅助治疗的反应和外科医生的专业知识。未来的研究应侧重于优化治疗方案,并进一步评估TNT在管理转移性侧方盆腔淋巴结中的作用。