• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

骨折风险再评估:2 型糖尿病患者的骨密度 T 评分与骨折风险。

Fracture risk revisited: Bone mineral density T-score and fracture risk in type 2 diabetes.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+ (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands.

School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism (NUTRIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Diabetes Obes Metab. 2024 Nov;26(11):5325-5335. doi: 10.1111/dom.15890. Epub 2024 Sep 4.

DOI:10.1111/dom.15890
PMID:39228286
Abstract

AIM

To study the association between femoral neck (FN) bone mineral density (BMD) T-score and fracture risk in individuals with and without type 2 diabetes (T2D).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a single-centre retrospective cohort study using the Danish National Health Service. BMD of the FN was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to study the association between FN BMD T-score and fractures in individuals with and without T2D separately, adjusted for age, comorbidities and comedication. The results from this analysis were used to estimate the 10-year absolute fracture risk.

RESULTS

In total, there were 35,129 women (2362 with T2D) and 7069 men (758 with T2D). The FN BMD T-score was significantly associated with risk of any, hip and major osteoporotic fracture in men and women with [adjusted hazard risk ratios (aHR) women, hip: 1.57; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.24-2.00, incidence rate (IR) 8.7; aHR men, hip: 1.55; 95% CI 1.01-2.36, IR 4.6] and without T2D (aHR women, hip: 1.75; 95% CI 1.64-1.87, IR 7.0; aHR men, hip: 1.97, 95% CI 1.73-2.25, IR 6.3), and its ability to predict fracture risk was similar. Fracture IRs were not significantly different for individuals with or without T2D, nor was the estimated cumulative 10-year fracture risk.

CONCLUSIONS

The FN BMD T-score was significantly associated with hip, non-spine and major osteoporotic fracture risk in men and women with and without T2D. Fracture risk for a given T-score and age was equal in individuals with and without T2D, as was the ability of the FN BMD T-score to predict fracture risk.

摘要

目的

研究 2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者和非 T2D 患者的股骨颈(FN)骨密度(BMD)T 评分与骨折风险之间的关系。

材料和方法

我们使用丹麦国家卫生服务进行了一项单中心回顾性队列研究。FN 的 BMD 通过双能 X 射线吸收法测量。使用 Cox 比例风险回归模型分别研究了 T2D 患者和非 T2D 患者 FN BMD T 评分与骨折之间的关系,并调整了年龄、合并症和合并用药。该分析的结果用于估计 10 年绝对骨折风险。

结果

共有 35129 名女性(2362 名患有 T2D)和 7069 名男性(758 名患有 T2D)。FN BMD T 评分与男性和女性的任何部位、髋部和主要骨质疏松性骨折风险显著相关[调整后的危险比(HR)女性,髋部:1.57;95%置信区间(CI)1.24-2.00,发病率(IR)8.7;HR 男性,髋部:1.55;95%CI 1.01-2.36,IR 4.6]和无 T2D(HR 女性,髋部:1.75;95%CI 1.64-1.87,IR 7.0;HR 男性,髋部:1.97,95%CI 1.73-2.25,IR 6.3),其预测骨折风险的能力相似。有或没有 T2D 的个体的骨折 IR 没有显著差异,估计的 10 年累积骨折风险也没有差异。

结论

FN BMD T 评分与 T2D 患者和非 T2D 患者的髋部、非脊柱和主要骨质疏松性骨折风险显著相关。对于给定的 T 评分和年龄,T2D 患者和非 T2D 患者的骨折风险相等,FN BMD T 评分预测骨折风险的能力也相等。

相似文献

1
Fracture risk revisited: Bone mineral density T-score and fracture risk in type 2 diabetes.骨折风险再评估:2 型糖尿病患者的骨密度 T 评分与骨折风险。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2024 Nov;26(11):5325-5335. doi: 10.1111/dom.15890. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
2
Nonstandard Lumbar Region in Predicting Fracture Risk.非标准腰椎部位预测骨折风险。
J Clin Densitom. 2018 Apr-Jun;21(2):220-226. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2017.05.014. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
3
Fracture Risk Indices From DXA-Based Finite Element Analysis Predict Incident Fractures Independently From FRAX: The Manitoba BMD Registry.基于 DXA 的有限元分析的骨折风险指数可独立于 FRAX 预测骨折事件:曼尼托巴 BMD 登记处。
J Clin Densitom. 2019 Jul-Sep;22(3):338-345. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2019.02.001. Epub 2019 Feb 8.
4
The utility of lumbar spine trabecular bone score and femoral neck bone mineral density for identifying asymptomatic vertebral fractures in well-compensated type 2 diabetic patients.腰椎小梁骨评分和股骨颈骨密度在识别血糖控制良好的2型糖尿病患者无症状椎体骨折中的应用
Osteoporos Int. 2016 Jan;27(1):49-56. doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3212-0. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
5
Which is the preferred site for bone mineral density monitoring as an indicator of treatment-related anti-fracture effect in routine clinical practice? A registry-based cohort study.在常规临床实践中,作为治疗相关抗骨折效果的指标,监测骨密度的首选部位是哪里?一项基于登记的队列研究。
Osteoporos Int. 2019 Jul;30(7):1445-1453. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-04975-y. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
6
Association of incident hip fracture with the estimated femoral strength by finite element analysis of DXA scans in the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) study.基于 DXA 扫描的有限元分析评估股骨强度与男性骨质疏松性骨折研究(MrOS)中发生髋部骨折的关系。
Osteoporos Int. 2018 Mar;29(3):643-651. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-4319-2. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
7
Bone mineral density enhances use of clinical risk factors in predicting ten-year risk of osteoporotic fractures in Chinese men: the Hong Kong Osteoporosis Study.骨密度增强了临床危险因素在预测中国男性骨质疏松性骨折十年风险中的应用:香港骨质疏松研究。
Osteoporos Int. 2011 Nov;22(11):2799-807. doi: 10.1007/s00198-010-1490-0. Epub 2011 Jan 14.
8
Sedentary behavior does not predict low BMD nor fracture-population-based Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study.久坐行为与低骨密度无关,也无法预测基于人群的加拿大多发性骨质疏松症研究中的骨折。
J Bone Miner Res. 2024 Apr 19;39(3):231-240. doi: 10.1093/jbmr/zjae004.
9
Spine bone texture assessed by trabecular bone score (TBS) predicts osteoporotic fractures in men: the Manitoba Bone Density Program.通过小梁骨评分(TBS)评估的脊柱骨纹理可预测男性骨质疏松性骨折:曼尼托巴骨密度项目。
Bone. 2014 Oct;67:10-4. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2014.06.034. Epub 2014 Jul 2.
10
Prevalence of vertebral fractures and associated factors in thai diabetic postmenopausal women.泰国绝经后糖尿病女性的椎体骨折患病率及相关因素。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 28;14(1):22404. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74463-9.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effect of Type 2 Diabetes on Bone Quality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies.2型糖尿病对骨质量的影响:队列研究的系统评价与荟萃分析
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Jun 6;22(6):910. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22060910.