Wu Nilian, Lang Xueyan, Zhang Yanxiu, Zhao Bing, Zhang Yao
Department of Cardiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, 150001 Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Key Laboratory of Myocardial Ischemia, Ministry of Education, Harbin Medical University, 150001 Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Aug 8;25(8):280. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2508280. eCollection 2024 Aug.
Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients who have improved ejection fraction have a better prognosis than those with persistently reduced ejection fraction. This study aimed to analyze the predictors for progression of patients with HFrEF to heart failure with improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF), as well as their characteristics and analyze predictors for prognosis.
A retrospective analysis was conducted on 1251 patients with HFrEF at baseline, who also had a second echocardiogram 3 months. After left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) reassessment, patients were separated into the HFimpEF group (n = 408) and the persistent HFrEF group (n = 611). The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization.
Multivariate logistic regression showed that without history of alcohol consumption (OR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.28-0.78), non-New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III-IV (OR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.15-0.52), without dilated cardiomyopathy (OR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.26-0.84), concomitant hypertension (OR: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.02-2.29), -blockers use (OR: 2.29, 95% CI: 1.54-3.43), and lower uric acid (OR: 0.999, 95% CI: 0.997-1.000) could predict LVEF improvement. Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated that HFimpEF patients had a significantly lower incidence of adverse events than HFrEF patients (log Rank 0.001). Multivariate Cox regression found that older age (HR: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.02-1.06), NYHA class III-IV (HR: 2.25, 95% CI: 1.28-3.95), concomitant valvular heart disease (HR: 1.98, 95% CI: 1.01-3.85), and higher creatinine (HR: 1.003, 95% CI: 1.001-1.004) were independent risk factors for the primary endpoint in HFimpEF patients.
HFrEF patients without a history of alcohol consumption, non-NYHA class III-IV, without dilated cardiomyopathy, concomitant hypertension, -blockers use, and lower uric acid were more likely to have LVEF improvement. Although the prognosis of HFimpEF patients was better than that of HFrEF patients, older age, NYHA class III-IV, concomitant valvular heart disease, and higher creatinine were still risk factors for cardiovascular events in HFimpEF patients.
射血分数降低的心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者中,射血分数改善者的预后优于射血分数持续降低者。本研究旨在分析HFrEF患者进展为射血分数改善的心力衰竭(HFimpEF)的预测因素及其特征,并分析预后的预测因素。
对1251例基线时患有HFrEF且在3个月后进行了第二次超声心动图检查的患者进行回顾性分析。在重新评估左心室射血分数(LVEF)后,将患者分为HFimpEF组(n = 408)和持续性HFrEF组(n = 611)。主要终点是心血管死亡或心力衰竭住院的复合终点。
多因素逻辑回归显示,无饮酒史(OR:0.47,95%CI:0.28 - 0.78)、非纽约心脏协会(NYHA)III - IV级(OR:0.28,95%CI:0.15 - 0.52)、无扩张型心肌病(OR:0.47,95%CI:0.26 - 0.84)、合并高血压(OR:1.53,95%CI:1.02 - 2.29)、使用β受体阻滞剂(OR:2.29,95%CI:1.54 - 3.43)以及较低的尿酸(OR:0.999,95%CI:0.997 - 1.000)可预测LVEF改善。Kaplan - Meier曲线表明,HFimpEF患者不良事件的发生率显著低于HFrEF患者(对数秩检验P = 0.001)。多因素Cox回归发现,年龄较大(HR:1.04,95%CI:1.02 - 1.06)、NYHA III - IV级(HR:2.25,95%CI:1.28 - 3.95)、合并瓣膜性心脏病(HR:1.98,95%CI:1.01 - 3.85)以及较高的肌酐水平(HR:1.003,95%CI:1.001 - 1.004)是HFimpEF患者主要终点的独立危险因素。
无饮酒史、非NYHA III - IV级、无扩张型心肌病、合并高血压、使用β受体阻滞剂以及尿酸较低的HFrEF患者更有可能出现LVEF改善。尽管HFimpEF患者的预后优于HFrEF患者,但年龄较大、NYHA III - IV级、合并瓣膜性心脏病以及较高的肌酐水平仍是HFimpEF患者心血管事件的危险因素。