Suppr超能文献

急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者心脏骤停与死亡率之间的关联

The Association between Cardiac Arrest and Mortality in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.

作者信息

Xiao Qian-Feng, Wei Xin, Wang Si, Xu Ying, Yang Yan, Huang Fang-Yang, Chen Mao

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 610041 Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

出版信息

Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Aug 1;25(8):274. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2508274. eCollection 2024 Aug.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The impact of cardiac arrest (CA) at admission on the prognosis of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a subject of debate.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study at West China Hospital from 2018 to 2021, enrolling 247 patients with AMI complicated by CS (AMI-CS). Patients were categorized into CA and non-CA groups based on their admission status. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed, with 30-day and 1-year mortality as the primary endpoints. Kaplan-Meier plots were constructed, and concordance (C)-indices of the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Event (GRACE) score, Intra-aortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock (IABP-SHOCK) II score, and IABP-SHOCK II score with CA were calculated.

RESULTS

Among the enrolled patients, 39 experienced CA and received cardiopulmonary resuscitation at admission. The 30-day and 1-year mortality rates were 40.9% and 47.0%, respectively. Neither univariate nor multivariate Cox regression analyses identified CA as a significant risk factor for 30-day and 1-year mortality. In C-statistics, the GRACE score exhibited a moderate effect (C-indices were 0.69 and 0.67, respectively), while the IABP-SHOCK II score had a better predictive performance (C-indices were 0.79 and 0.76, respectively) for the 30-day and 1-year mortality. Furthermore, CA did not enhance the predictive value of the IABP-SHOCK II score for 30-day ( = 0.864) and 1-year mortality ( = 0.888).

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiac arrest at admission did not influence the survival of patients with AMI-CS. Active resuscitation should be prioritized for patients with AMI-CS, regardless of the presence of cardiac arrest.

摘要

背景

入院时心脏骤停(CA)对急性心肌梗死(AMI)合并心源性休克(CS)患者预后的影响仍存在争议。

方法

我们于2018年至2021年在华西医院进行了一项回顾性研究,纳入247例AMI合并CS(AMI-CS)患者。根据入院时的情况将患者分为CA组和非CA组。进行单因素和多因素Cox回归分析,以30天和1年死亡率作为主要终点。构建Kaplan-Meier曲线,并计算全球急性冠状动脉事件注册(GRACE)评分、心源性休克主动脉内球囊反搏(IABP-SHOCK)II评分以及伴有CA的IABP-SHOCK II评分的一致性(C)指数。

结果

在纳入的患者中,39例在入院时发生CA并接受了心肺复苏。30天和1年死亡率分别为40.9%和47.0%。单因素和多因素Cox回归分析均未将CA确定为30天和1年死亡率的显著危险因素。在C统计量中,GRACE评分显示出中等效应(C指数分别为0.69和0.67),而IABP-SHOCK II评分对30天和1年死亡率具有更好的预测性能(C指数分别为0.79和0.76)。此外,CA并未提高IABP-SHOCK II评分对30天(P = 0.864)和1年死亡率(P = 0.888)的预测价值。

结论

入院时心脏骤停不影响AMI-CS患者的生存。对于AMI-CS患者,无论是否存在心脏骤停,均应优先进行积极复苏。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3ae/11366983/0bc94c5936e5/2153-8174-25-8-274-g1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验