• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估ChatGPT对中文常见近视相关问题的回答质量和可读性。

Evaluation of the quality and readability of ChatGPT responses to frequently asked questions about myopia in traditional Chinese language.

作者信息

Chang Li-Chun, Sun Chi-Chin, Chen Ting-Han, Tsai Der-Chong, Lin Hui-Ling, Liao Li-Ling

机构信息

School of Nursing, Chang Gung University of Science and Technology, Gueishan.

School of Nursing, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Tao-Yuan.

出版信息

Digit Health. 2024 Sep 2;10:20552076241277021. doi: 10.1177/20552076241277021. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.

DOI:10.1177/20552076241277021
PMID:39229462
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11369861/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

ChatGPT can serve as an adjunct informational tool for ophthalmologists and their patients. However, the reliability and readability of its responses to myopia-related queries in the Chinese language remain underexplored.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the ability of ChatGPT to address frequently asked questions (FAQs) about myopia by parents and caregivers.

METHOD

Myopia-related FAQs were input three times into fresh ChatGPT sessions, and the responses were evaluated by 10 ophthalmologists using a Likert scale for appropriateness, usability, and clarity. The Chinese Readability Index Explorer (CRIE) was used to evaluate the readability of each response. Inter-rater reliability among the reviewers was examined using Cohen's kappa coefficient, and Spearman's rank correlation analysis and one-way analysis of variance were used to investigate the relationship between CRIE scores and each criterion.

RESULTS

Forty-five percent of the responses of ChatGPT in Chinese language were appropriate and usable and only 35% met all the set criteria. The CRIE scores for 20 ChatGPT responses ranged from 7.29 to 12.09, indicating that the readability level was equivalent to a middle-to-high school level. Responses about the treatment efficacy and side effects were deficient for all three criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

The performance of ChatGPT in addressing pediatric myopia-related questions is currently suboptimal. As parents increasingly utilize digital resources to obtain health information, it has become crucial for eye care professionals to familiarize themselves with artificial intelligence-driven information on pediatric myopia.

摘要

引言

ChatGPT可作为眼科医生及其患者的辅助信息工具。然而,其对中文近视相关问题回答的可靠性和可读性仍未得到充分探索。

目的

本研究旨在评估ChatGPT回答家长和护理人员关于近视常见问题的能力。

方法

将近视相关常见问题输入新的ChatGPT会话三次,由10名眼科医生使用李克特量表对回答的适当性、可用性和清晰度进行评估。使用中文可读性指数浏览器(CRIE)评估每个回答的可读性。使用科恩kappa系数检验评审员之间的评分者间信度,并使用斯皮尔曼等级相关分析和单因素方差分析研究CRIE分数与每个标准之间的关系。

结果

ChatGPT的中文回答中有45%是适当且可用的,只有35%符合所有设定标准。20条ChatGPT回答的CRIE分数在7.29至12.09之间,表明可读性水平相当于初中到高中水平。关于治疗效果和副作用的回答在所有三个标准上都存在不足。

结论

ChatGPT在回答儿童近视相关问题方面的表现目前并不理想。随着家长越来越多地利用数字资源获取健康信息,眼科护理专业人员熟悉人工智能驱动的儿童近视信息变得至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4eb9/11369861/f6ea89aa8099/10.1177_20552076241277021-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4eb9/11369861/f6ea89aa8099/10.1177_20552076241277021-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4eb9/11369861/f6ea89aa8099/10.1177_20552076241277021-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the quality and readability of ChatGPT responses to frequently asked questions about myopia in traditional Chinese language.评估ChatGPT对中文常见近视相关问题的回答质量和可读性。
Digit Health. 2024 Sep 2;10:20552076241277021. doi: 10.1177/20552076241277021. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
2
Dr. Google vs. Dr. ChatGPT: Exploring the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Ophthalmology by Comparing the Accuracy, Safety, and Readability of Responses to Frequently Asked Patient Questions Regarding Cataracts and Cataract Surgery.谷歌医生与ChatGPT医生:通过比较关于白内障及白内障手术的常见患者问题的回答的准确性、安全性和可读性,探索人工智能在眼科领域的应用。
Semin Ophthalmol. 2024 Aug;39(6):472-479. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2024.2326058. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
3
Assessment of the Responses of the Artificial Intelligence-based Chatbot ChatGPT-4 to Frequently Asked Questions About Amblyopia and Childhood Myopia.评估基于人工智能的聊天机器人 ChatGPT-4 对关于弱视和儿童近视的常见问题的回答。
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2024 Mar-Apr;61(2):86-89. doi: 10.3928/01913913-20231005-02. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
4
Is Information About Musculoskeletal Malignancies From Large Language Models or Web Resources at a Suitable Reading Level for Patients?来自大语言模型或网络资源的关于肌肉骨骼恶性肿瘤的信息对患者来说是否处于合适的阅读水平?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Feb 1;483(2):306-315. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003263. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
5
Assessing the utility of ChatGPT as an artificial intelligence-based large language model for information to answer questions on myopia.评估ChatGPT作为基于人工智能的大型语言模型在获取有关近视问题答案方面的实用性。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2023 Nov;43(6):1562-1570. doi: 10.1111/opo.13207. Epub 2023 Jul 21.
6
Is ChatGPT a Reliable Source of Patient Information on Asthma?ChatGPT是哮喘患者信息的可靠来源吗?
Cureus. 2024 Jul 8;16(7):e64114. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64114. eCollection 2024 Jul.
7
Benchmarking large language models' performances for myopia care: a comparative analysis of ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4.0, and Google Bard.比较分析 ChatGPT-3.5、ChatGPT-4.0 和谷歌巴德在近视防控方面的表现:大型语言模型的基准测试。
EBioMedicine. 2023 Sep;95:104770. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104770. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
8
Digesting Digital Health: A Study of Appropriateness and Readability of ChatGPT-Generated Gastroenterological Information.消化数字健康:ChatGPT 生成的胃肠病学信息适宜性和可读性的研究。
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2024 Nov 1;15(11):e00765. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000765.
9
ChatGPT vs Google for Queries Related to Dementia and Other Cognitive Decline: Comparison of Results.ChatGPT 与谷歌在痴呆症和其他认知能力下降相关查询上的对比:结果比较。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jul 25;25:e48966. doi: 10.2196/48966.
10
Evaluating the Efficacy of ChatGPT as a Patient Education Tool in Prostate Cancer: Multimetric Assessment.评估 ChatGPT 在前列腺癌患者教育中的疗效:多指标评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 14;26:e55939. doi: 10.2196/55939.

引用本文的文献

1
Leveraging ChatGPT to strengthen pediatric healthcare systems: a systematic review.利用ChatGPT加强儿科医疗系统:一项系统综述
Eur J Pediatr. 2025 Jul 12;184(8):478. doi: 10.1007/s00431-025-06320-4.
2
Large language models in the management of chronic ocular diseases: a scoping review.大语言模型在慢性眼病管理中的应用:一项范围综述
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2025 Jun 18;13:1608988. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2025.1608988. eCollection 2025.
3
Enhancing ophthalmology students' awareness of retinitis pigmentosa: assessing the efficacy of ChatGPT in AI-assisted teaching of rare diseases-a quasi-experimental study.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating the accuracy and readability of ChatGPT in providing parental guidance for adenoidectomy, tonsillectomy, and ventilation tube insertion surgery.评估 ChatGPT 在提供腺样体切除术、扁桃体切除术和通气管插入手术的家长指导方面的准确性和可读性。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Jun;181:111998. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2024.111998. Epub 2024 May 31.
2
Appropriateness of ChatGPT in Answering Heart Failure Related Questions.ChatGPT 在回答心力衰竭相关问题方面的适宜性。
Heart Lung Circ. 2024 Sep;33(9):1314-1318. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2024.03.005. Epub 2024 May 31.
3
Empowering inclusivity: improving readability of living kidney donation information with ChatGPT.
提高眼科学生对色素性视网膜炎的认识:评估ChatGPT在罕见病人工智能辅助教学中的效果——一项准实验研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Mar 18;12:1534294. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1534294. eCollection 2025.
增强包容性:利用ChatGPT提高活体肾捐赠信息的可读性。
Front Digit Health. 2024 Apr 10;6:1366967. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1366967. eCollection 2024.
4
A Multidisciplinary Assessment of ChatGPT's Knowledge of Amyloidosis: Observational Study.对ChatGPT关于淀粉样变性知识的多学科评估:观察性研究。
JMIR Cardio. 2024 Apr 19;8:e53421. doi: 10.2196/53421.
5
ChatGPT-3.5 and Bing Chat in ophthalmology: an updated evaluation of performance, readability, and informative sources.眼科领域中的ChatGPT-3.5和必应聊天:性能、可读性及信息来源的最新评估
Eye (Lond). 2024 Jul;38(10):1897-1902. doi: 10.1038/s41433-024-03037-w. Epub 2024 Mar 20.
6
ChatGPT: Is This Patient Education Tool for Urological Malignancies Readable for the General Population?ChatGPT:这种用于泌尿系统恶性肿瘤的患者教育工具普通大众能读懂吗?
Res Rep Urol. 2024 Jan 16;16:31-37. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S440633. eCollection 2024.
7
Talking technology: exploring chatbots as a tool for cataract patient education.技术漫谈:探索聊天机器人作为白内障患者教育工具的作用
Clin Exp Optom. 2025 Jan;108(1):56-64. doi: 10.1080/08164622.2023.2298812. Epub 2024 Jan 9.
8
Performance of ChatGPT incorporated chain-of-thought method in bilingual nuclear medicine physician board examinations.结合思维链方法的ChatGPT在双语核医学医师资格考试中的表现
Digit Health. 2024 Jan 5;10:20552076231224074. doi: 10.1177/20552076231224074. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
9
Assessment of the Responses of the Artificial Intelligence-based Chatbot ChatGPT-4 to Frequently Asked Questions About Amblyopia and Childhood Myopia.评估基于人工智能的聊天机器人 ChatGPT-4 对关于弱视和儿童近视的常见问题的回答。
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2024 Mar-Apr;61(2):86-89. doi: 10.3928/01913913-20231005-02. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
10
Benchmarking large language models' performances for myopia care: a comparative analysis of ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4.0, and Google Bard.比较分析 ChatGPT-3.5、ChatGPT-4.0 和谷歌巴德在近视防控方面的表现:大型语言模型的基准测试。
EBioMedicine. 2023 Sep;95:104770. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104770. Epub 2023 Aug 23.