Intermountain Healthcare Department of Population Health Sciences, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City (J.A.J., C.G.D., J.B.K., A.P.B.).
The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (A.R., N.W.).
Hypertension. 2024 Nov;81(11):2307-2317. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.124.23509. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
Antihypertensive medication use patterns have likely been influenced by changing costs and accessibility over the past 3 decades. This study examines the relationships between patent exclusivity loss, medication costs, and national health policies on antihypertensive medication use.
Using 1996 to 2021 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data of US adults with hypertension taking at least 1 antihypertensive medication, we conducted a cross-sectional analysis. We explored the associations between patent exclusivity loss, per-pill costs, and Medicare Part D enactment on medication use over time, focusing on the most commonly used medications (lisinopril, amlodipine, losartan, hydrochlorothiazide, and metoprolol).
The unweighted sample comprised 50 095 US adults (mean age, 62 years; 53% female). The survey-weighted number of adults taking antihypertensive medications increased from 22 million (95% CIs, 20-23 million) to 55 million (95% CI, 51-60 million) between 1996 and 2021. Loss of patent exclusivity led to increased medication fills, notably for lisinopril, amlodipine, and losartan, which all exhibited within-class dominance. However, per-pill cost decreases coinciding with Medicare Part D did not increase the number of individuals treated or the use of specific antihypertensive medications or classes.
The increase in antihypertensive medication use over the past decades highlights the significant impact of loss of patent exclusivity on the uptake in the use of specific medications. These findings underscore the complexity of factors influencing medication use, beyond cost reductions alone, and suggest that policies need to consider multiple facets to effectively improve antihypertensive medication accessibility and utilization.
在过去的 30 年中,降压药物的使用模式可能受到成本和可及性变化的影响。本研究考察了专利专有权丧失、药物成本和国家卫生政策对降压药物使用的关系。
使用 1996 年至 2021 年美国高血压至少服用一种降压药物的成年人的医疗支出面板调查数据,我们进行了横断面分析。我们探讨了专利专有权丧失、每片药物成本和医疗保险处方药部分颁布对药物使用随时间的变化的关系,重点关注最常用的药物(赖诺普利、氨氯地平、氯沙坦、氢氯噻嗪和美托洛尔)。
未加权样本包括 50095 名美国成年人(平均年龄 62 岁;53%为女性)。1996 年至 2021 年,服用降压药物的成年人数量从 2200 万(95%CI,2000-2300 万)增加到 5500 万(95%CI,5100-6000 万)。专利专有权丧失导致药物用量增加,特别是赖诺普利、氨氯地平和氯沙坦,它们都表现出同类内优势。然而,与医疗保险处方药部分同时发生的每片药物成本降低并没有增加治疗人数或特定降压药物或类别的使用。
过去几十年中降压药物使用的增加突出表明专利专有权丧失对特定药物使用的吸收的重大影响。这些发现强调了影响药物使用的因素的复杂性,不仅仅是成本降低,还表明政策需要考虑多个方面,以有效提高降压药物的可及性和利用。