Angle Orthod. 2024 Jul 1;94(4):400-407. doi: 10.2319/101123-691.1.
To evaluate leveling of the Curve of Wilson (COW) by two different treatment appliances (clear aligners [CA] and continuous archwire fixed appliances [FA]) in a permanent dentition sample of patients.
Digital casts of 40 patients (CA group = 20 patients; FA group = 20 patients) were collected. Angular values for COW, right and left vertical height difference of lower first molars, and linear distance between lower teeth and the WALA ridge were analyzed for pre- (T1), posttreatment (T2) and on final virtual (ClinCheck) models (T2-CC) of the CA group. An unpaired t-test was used to evaluate significant intergroup differences (P < .05), while a paired t-test was used for posttreatment CA intragroup comparison.
FA group showed better control of second molar crown positions compared to CA group (47-WALA = -0.2 ± 0.1 mm, 37-WALA = -0.6 ± 0.3 mm). No significant difference was detected for linear distance of lower first molars and the WALA ridge or for vertical height difference. CA group showed a greater reduction of distance between lower premolars and the WALA ridge (mean difference: -0.5 mm for both 45-WALA and 35-WALA; mean difference: -0.5 mm for 44-WALA, -0.6 mm for 34-WALA). Predictability for the CA group was high for every measurement (87% Right COW, 89% Left COW, 88% 46 Vertical Diff, 87% 36 Vertical Diff).
Clear aligner and continuous archwire mechanics were effective in leveling COW. FA was more effective in changing crown position of lower second molars with respect to the WALA ridge, while CA provided a greater distance reduction between lower premolars and WALA ridges compared to FA.
评估两种不同治疗器具(透明牙套[CA]和连续弓丝固定矫治器[FA])在恒牙样本中对 Wilson 曲线(COW)的整平效果。
收集 40 名患者(CA 组=20 名患者;FA 组=20 名患者)的数字模型。分析 CA 组治疗前后(T1)和最终虚拟(ClinCheck)模型(T2-CC)的 COW 角值、下颌第一磨牙左右垂直高度差和下颌牙齿与 WALA 嵴的线性距离。使用独立样本 t 检验评估组间差异的显著性(P<.05),而 CA 组内的治疗后比较则使用配对 t 检验。
FA 组与 CA 组相比,第二磨牙冠位置的控制更好(47-WALA=-0.2±0.1mm,37-WALA=-0.6±0.3mm)。下颌第一磨牙和 WALA 嵴的线性距离或垂直高度差无显著差异。CA 组的下颌前磨牙与 WALA 嵴的距离减小更大(45-WALA 和 35-WALA 的平均差异均为-0.5mm;44-WALA 的平均差异为-0.5mm,34-WALA 的平均差异为-0.6mm)。CA 组对每种测量的预测性均较高(87%右 COW,89%左 COW,88%46 垂直差,87%36 垂直差)。
透明牙套和连续弓丝力学均能有效整平 COW。FA 对下颌第二磨牙相对于 WALA 嵴的冠位置改变更有效,而 CA 与 FA 相比,下颌前磨牙与 WALA 嵴之间的距离减小更大。