Angle Orthod. 2024 Sep 1;94(5):496-503. doi: 10.2319/121023-818.1.
OBJECTIVES: To compare vertical and transverse changes in mixed dentition patients treated with the Invisalign First System (IFS) to those treated with a banded hyrax expander with fixed appliances (Hyrax) and control groups, and to assess the efficiency rate of dental arch expansion with IFS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 80 mixed dentition patients, with 40 in each group (IFS and Hyrax) and 40 controls from the American Association of Orthodontists Foundation Craniofacial Growth Legacy Collection. Skeletal and dental vertical dimension changes and arch width changes between pretreatment (T1) and posttreatment (T2) were evaluated. RESULTS: Age at T1, time interval (T1-T2), sex, and Angle class did not significantly differ among the groups. Mandibular plane angle changes showed a similar reduction for the control and IFS groups, with no changes in the Hyrax group. However, the differences among the three groups did not reach statistical significance (P = .06). The Hyrax group showed significantly greater expansion in maxillary intermolar width compared to the IFS group, 4.4 vs 2.5 mm, respectively. The efficiency of maxillary expansion using IFS ranged from 52.3% to 76.87%. CONCLUSIONS: During the mixed dentition stage, no significant changes occurred in vertical dimensions among the control, Hyrax, and IFS groups. Although there was a trend suggesting a greater reduction in mandibular plane angle in the IFS group compared to the Hyrax group, this may not be clinically significant given the less than 1° difference. IFS can be a viable option for addressing mild arch width deficiencies, with a predictable increase in intermolar width of approximately 2.5 mm.
目的:比较应用 Invisalign First 系统(IFS)和带环 Hyrax 扩弓器联合固定矫治器(Hyrax)治疗混合牙列期患者的垂直向和横向变化,并评估 IFS 牙弓扩展的效率。
材料与方法:该研究纳入 80 例混合牙列期患者,每组 40 例(IFS 组和 Hyrax 组),对照组 40 例来自美国正畸协会基金会颅面生长遗产库。评估治疗前(T1)和治疗后(T2)时的骨骼和牙齿垂直向变化以及牙弓宽度变化。
结果:T1 时的年龄、时间间隔(T1-T2)、性别和 Angle 分类在各组间无显著差异。对照组和 IFS 组下颌平面角变化相似,均有减小,而 Hyrax 组无变化。但三组间差异无统计学意义(P =.06)。Hyrax 组上颌尖牙间宽度的扩展明显大于 IFS 组,分别为 4.4 和 2.5mm。IFS 用于上颌扩展的效率范围为 52.3%至 76.87%。
结论:在混合牙列期,对照组、Hyrax 组和 IFS 组的垂直向变化无显著差异。虽然 IFS 组的下颌平面角减小趋势大于 Hyrax 组,但考虑到差异小于 1°,这可能无临床意义。IFS 可作为解决轻度牙弓宽度不足的可行方案,可预测增加约 2.5mm 的尖牙间宽度。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009-9
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006-8
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020-1
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2023-12
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017-4
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000-5