• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Assessment of vertical changes during maxillary expansion using quad helix or bonded rapid maxillary expander.使用四螺旋扩弓器或固定快速上颌扩弓器对上颌扩弓过程中的垂直变化进行评估。
Angle Orthod. 2016 Nov;86(6):925-933. doi: 10.2319/112315-799. Epub 2016 May 16.
2
Short-term treatment effects of quad-helix on maxillomandibular expansion in patients with maxillary incisor crowding.四眼簧矫治技术对上颌切牙拥挤患者的上颌骨和下颌骨扩弓的短期治疗效果。
Odontology. 2012 Jan;100(1):76-86. doi: 10.1007/s10266-011-0028-z. Epub 2011 Jun 15.
3
Treatment effects of bonded RME and vertical-pull chincup followed by fixed appliance in patients with increased vertical dimension.垂直高度增加患者采用粘结式快速扩弓器和垂直牵引颏兜治疗后接用固定矫治器的治疗效果
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Sep;128(3):326-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.03.039.
4
Treatment timing for an orthopedic approach to patients with increased vertical dimension.针对垂直距离增加患者的骨科治疗时机。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Jan;133(1):58-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.048.
5
Mandibular response after rapid maxillary expansion in class II growing patients: a pilot randomized controlled trial.生长发育期安氏 II 类错颌患者快速扩弓后下颌骨的反应：一项初步随机对照试验。
Prog Orthod. 2017 Nov 6;18(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s40510-017-0189-6.
6
A randomized clinical trial to assess the sagittal effects of Transforce transverse appliance (TTA) and NiTi palatal expander (NPE) on skeletal class II malocclusion in growing patients during retention phase - A cephalometric study using a historical control group.一项随机临床试验，评估 Transforce 横向矫治器（TTA）和 NiTi 腭扩展器（NPE）在生长发育期骨骼 II 类错颌患者保持阶段的矢状向效应 - 一项使用历史对照组的头影测量研究。
Int Orthod. 2020 Dec;18(4):722-731. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2020.08.007. Epub 2020 Oct 2.
7
Skeletal and dental changes in the sagittal, vertical, and transverse dimensions after rapid palatal expansion.快速腭扩展后矢状、垂直和横向维度的骨骼及牙齿变化
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004 Nov;126(5):569-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.10.035.
8
Cephalometric evaluation of rapid and slow maxillary expansion in patients with BCLP: .唇腭裂患者快速和慢速上颌扩张的头影测量评估：.
Angle Orthod. 2019 Jul;89(4):583-589. doi: 10.2319/081018-589.1. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
9
Dentoskeletal effects of rapid maxillary expander therapy in early mixed dentition patients with different vertical growing patterns without posterior crossbite: A retrospective study.快速上颌扩弓治疗对不同垂直生长型且无后牙反合的早期混合牙列患者的牙颌面影响：一项回顾性研究。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2023 Mar;163(3):319-327. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.11.018. Epub 2022 Nov 25.
10
Skeletal alterations associated with the use of bonded rapid maxillary expansion appliance.与使用粘结式快速上颌扩弓矫治器相关的骨骼改变。
Braz Dent J. 2011;22(4):334-9. doi: 10.1590/s0103-64402011000400013.

引用本文的文献

1
Orthodontists' Knowledge and Perception of the Prolonged Use of Rapid Palatal Expanders (RPEs) in the Saudi Arabian Population: A Cross-Sectional Study.沙特阿拉伯人群中正畸医生对长期使用快速腭扩展器（RPEs）的认知与看法：一项横断面研究
Cureus. 2024 Oct 10;16(10):e71207. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71207. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Vertical and transverse treatment effects of Invisalign First system compared to Hyrax maxillary expanders with fixed appliances in mixed dentition patients.恒牙早期安氏Ⅰ类错[牙合]患者使用 Invisalign First 系统与 Hyrax 扩弓器联合固定矫治器的垂直向和矢状向治疗效果比较。
Angle Orthod. 2024 Sep 1;94(5):496-503. doi: 10.2319/121023-818.1.
3
Skeletal and Dentoalveolar Changes in Growing Patients Treated with Rapid Maxillary Expansion Measured in 3D Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.三维锥形束计算机断层扫描测量快速上颌扩弓治疗的生长发育期患者的骨骼和牙槽骨变化。
Biomedicines. 2023 Dec 13;11(12):3305. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11123305.
4
Changes in the Mandible Following Rapid Maxillary Expansion in Children with Class II Malocclusion: A Systematic Review.II类错颌儿童快速上颌扩弓后下颌骨的变化：一项系统评价
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Jul 11;12(7):1688. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12071688.
5
Evaluation of self-perceived pain and jaw function impairment in children undergoing slow and rapid maxillary expansion.评价儿童在慢速和快速上颌扩张过程中的自我感知疼痛和颌功能障碍。
Angle Orthod. 2021 Nov 1;91(6):725-732. doi: 10.2319/020221-100.1.
6
Influence of different types of rapid maxillary expansion on root resorption: a systematic review.不同类型上颌快速扩弓对牙根吸收影响的系统评价。
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Feb 1;39(1):38-47. doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2021.01.006.
7
Comparison of the effects of rapid maxillary expansion versus Twin Block appliance on mandibular growth in skeletal Class II patients.比较快速上颌扩展与 Twin Block 矫治器对上颌骨生长的影响在骨性 II 类患者中。
BMC Oral Health. 2020 Dec 1;20(1):350. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01344-8.
8
Rapid maxillary expansion outcomes according to midpalatal suture maturation levels.根据硬腭正中缝骨成熟度水平评估快速上颌扩展的效果。
Prog Orthod. 2019 Jul 15;20(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s40510-019-0278-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of the variable anchorage straightwire technique using Ricketts' growth prediction.使用里氏生长预测法对可变支抗直丝弓技术的评估。
Eur J Orthod. 2009 Feb;31(1):76-83. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjn038. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
2
Facial growth prediction: a comparison of methodologies.面部生长预测：方法学比较
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Oct;132(4):439-49. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.10.026.
3
A prospective study of the short-term treatment effects of the acrylic-splint rapid maxillary expander combined with the lower Schwarz appliance.丙烯酸夹板式快速上颌扩弓器联合下颌施瓦茨矫治器短期治疗效果的前瞻性研究
Angle Orthod. 2005 Jan;75(1):7-14. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)075<0007:APSOTS>2.0.CO;2.
4
THE TREATMENT OF MAXILLARY DEFICIENCY BY OPENING THE MIDPALATAL SUTURE.通过打开腭中缝治疗上颌骨缺损
Angle Orthod. 1965 Jul;35:200-17. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1965)035<0200:TTOMDB>2.0.CO;2.
5
Evaluation of Ricketts' long-range growth prediction in Turkish children.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999 May;115(5):515-20. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(99)70273-8.
6
The quad helix appliance.
Semin Orthod. 1998 Dec;4(4):231-7. doi: 10.1016/s1073-8746(98)80028-5.
7
Skeletal and dental changes after maxillary expansion in the mixed dentition.混合牙列期上颌扩弓后的骨骼和牙齿变化
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997 Mar;111(3):321-7. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(97)70191-4.
8
Biomechanical basis of vertical dimension control during rapid palatal expansion therapy.快速腭扩展治疗中垂直距离控制的生物力学基础。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994 Sep;106(3):322-8. doi: 10.1016/S0889-5406(94)70053-2.
9
Changes concurrent with orthodontic treatment when maxillary expansion is a primary goal.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995 Aug;108(2):184-93. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(95)70082-x.
10
The effects of maxillary expansion using a quad-helix appliance during the deciduous and mixed dentitions.乳牙列和混合牙列期使用四螺旋矫治器进行上颌扩弓的效果。
Am J Orthod. 1981 Feb;79(2):152-61. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(81)90313-4.

使用四螺旋扩弓器或固定快速上颌扩弓器对上颌扩弓过程中的垂直变化进行评估。

Assessment of vertical changes during maxillary expansion using quad helix or bonded rapid maxillary expander.

作者信息

Conroy-Piskai Cara, Galang-Boquiren Maria Therese S, Obrez Ales, Viana Maria Grace Costa, Oppermann Nelson, Sanchez Flavio, Edgren Bradford, Kusnoto Budi

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 2016 Nov;86(6):925-933. doi: 10.2319/112315-799. Epub 2016 May 16.

DOI:10.2319/112315-799
PMID:27182780
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8597322/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine if there is a significantly different effect on vertical changes during phase I palatal expansion treatment using a quad helix and a bonded rapid maxillary expander in growing skeletal Class I and Class II patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study looked at 2 treatment groups, a quad helix group and a bonded rapid maxillary expander group, before treatment (T1) and at the completion of phase I treatment (T2). Each treatment group was compared to an untreated predicted growth model. Lateral cephalograms at T1 and T2 were traced and analyzed for changes in vertical dimension.

RESULTS

No differences were found between the treatment groups at T1, but significant differences at T2 were found for convexity, lower facial height, total facial height, facial axis, and Frankfort Mandibular Plane Angle (FMA) variables. A comparison of treatment groups at T2 to their respective untreated predicted growth models found a significant difference for the lower facial height variable in the quad helix group and for the upper first molar to palatal plane (U6-PP) variable in the bonded expander group.

CONCLUSION

Overall, both the quad helix expander and the bonded rapid maxillary expander showed minimal vertical changes during palatal expansion treatment. The differences at T2 suggested that the quad helix expander had more control over skeletal vertical measurements. When comparing treatment results to untreated predicted growth values, the quad helix expander appeared to better maintain lower facial height and the bonded rapid maxillary expander appeared to better maintain the maxillary first molar vertical height.

摘要

目的

确定在生长发育期的骨骼I类和II类患者中，使用四螺旋扩弓器和固定快速上颌扩弓器进行I期腭扩展治疗时，对垂直变化的影响是否存在显著差异。

材料与方法

这项回顾性研究观察了2个治疗组，即四螺旋扩弓器组和固定快速上颌扩弓器组，在治疗前（T1）和I期治疗结束时（T2）的情况。将每个治疗组与未经治疗的预测生长模型进行比较。对T1和T2时的头颅侧位片进行描记并分析垂直维度的变化。

结果

在T1时，治疗组之间未发现差异，但在T2时，发现凸度、面下高度、全面高、面轴和法兰克福下颌平面角（FMA）变量存在显著差异。将T2时的治疗组与其各自未经治疗的预测生长模型进行比较，发现四螺旋扩弓器组的面下高度变量和固定扩弓器组的上颌第一磨牙至腭平面（U6-PP）变量存在显著差异。

结论

总体而言，四螺旋扩弓器和固定快速上颌扩弓器在腭扩展治疗期间均显示出最小的垂直变化。T2时的差异表明，四螺旋扩弓器对骨骼垂直测量的控制更强。当将治疗结果与未经治疗的预测生长值进行比较时,四螺旋扩弓器似乎能更好地维持面下高度，而固定快速上颌扩弓器似乎能更好地维持上颌第一磨牙的垂直高度。