• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

术中透视确认膝关节可提高使用牵引台行直接前侧入路全髋关节置换术时股骨柄前倾角的准确性。

Intraoperative fluoroscopic confirmation of the knee improves the accuracy of stem anteversion in total hip arthroplasty with direct anterior approach using traction table.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Japanese Red Cross Narita Hospital, 90-1 Iida Cho, Narita city, Chiba, 286-8523, Japan.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Chiba Aoba Municipal Hospital, 1273-2 Aoba-Cho, Chuo-ku, Chiba City, Chiba, 286-0852, Japan.

出版信息

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Sep;144(9):4217-4223. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05509-w. Epub 2024 Sep 4.

DOI:10.1007/s00402-024-05509-w
PMID:39230718
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Stem anteversion (SA) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is crucial for postoperative outcomes, affecting dislocation risk and hip function. Accurate SA placement is challenged by intraoperative estimation methods, with discrepancies reported between predicted and true SA. This study investigates the effect of conventional methods and intraoperative fluoroscopic confirmation on SA accuracy in THA performed with a direct anterior approach using a traction table.

METHODS

This involves 200 patients undergoing primary THA from August 2019 to January 2023, divided into a conventional group (n = 100) and a fluoroscopic group (n = 100). Postoperative SA measurements were conducted using computed tomography scans. Statistical analysis focused on comparing the SA angles and the prevalence of excessive SA (≥>35° and ≥>40°) between the groups.

RESULTS

The fluoroscopic group showed a lower average SA angle (24.3° ± 8.3°) compared to the conventional group (30.0° ± 11.3°), with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.01). Excessive SA (≥>40°) was found in 17% of the conventional group, significantly reduced to 5% in the fluoroscopic group (p < 0.01). Similarly, SA exceeding 35° was present in 39% of the conventional group, compared to only 11% in the fluoroscopic group (p < 0.01), indicating a substantial reduction in excessive SA placements with fluoroscopic guidance.

DISCUSSION

The study demonstrates that intraoperative fluoroscopic guidance significantly enhances the accuracy of SA placement in THA, reducing the variability and proportion of excessive SA. This suggests a critical reevaluation of conventional estimation methods in favor of fluoroscopic confirmation to improve surgical outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative fluoroscopic confirmation of knee external rotation angle markedly decreases the proportion of excessive SA and enhances the precision of stem placement in THA with a direct anterior approach. This technique represents a significant advancement in surgical practice, offering a simple and effective method to achieve optimal postoperative results.

摘要

背景

在全髋关节置换术(THA)中,股骨前倾角(SA)至关重要,它影响着脱位风险和髋关节功能。术中评估方法存在准确性挑战,预测值与真实值之间存在差异。本研究旨在探讨在使用牵引台行直接前入路 THA 时,传统方法和术中透视确认对 SA 准确性的影响。

方法

本研究纳入了 2019 年 8 月至 2023 年 1 月期间行初次 THA 的 200 例患者,分为常规组(n=100)和透视组(n=100)。术后使用计算机断层扫描(CT)测量 SA 角度。重点比较两组间 SA 角度和过度 SA(≥35°和≥40°)的发生率。

结果

透视组的平均 SA 角度(24.3°±8.3°)显著低于常规组(30.0°±11.3°),差异有统计学意义(p<0.01)。常规组中过度 SA(≥40°)的发生率为 17%,透视组显著降低至 5%(p<0.01)。同样,常规组中 SA 超过 35°的发生率为 39%,透视组则降至 11%(p<0.01),表明透视引导下过度 SA 放置的数量显著减少。

讨论

本研究表明,术中透视引导可显著提高 THA 中 SA 放置的准确性,降低 SA 过度的变异性和比例。这表明需要对传统的估计方法进行批判性评估,转而支持透视确认,以改善手术结果。

结论

术中透视确认膝关节外旋角度可显著降低过度 SA 的比例,提高直接前入路 THA 中股骨柄的放置精度。该技术代表了手术实践的重大进步,为实现术后最佳结果提供了一种简单有效的方法。

相似文献

1
Intraoperative fluoroscopic confirmation of the knee improves the accuracy of stem anteversion in total hip arthroplasty with direct anterior approach using traction table.术中透视确认膝关节可提高使用牵引台行直接前侧入路全髋关节置换术时股骨柄前倾角的准确性。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Sep;144(9):4217-4223. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05509-w. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
2
Reliability and accuracy of intraoperative fluoroscopy assessment of acetabular cup anteversion in supine direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty.在仰卧直接前入路全髋关节置换术中,术中透视评估髋臼杯前倾角的可靠性和准确性。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 30;14(1):12469. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-62964-6.
3
Intraoperative evaluation of acetabular cup position during anterior approach total hip arthroplasty: are we accurately interpreting?前路全髋关节置换术中髋臼杯位置的术中评估:我们的解读准确吗?
Hip Int. 2020 Jan;30(1):40-47. doi: 10.1177/1120700019868665. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
4
Fluoroscopy assessment during anterior minimally invasive hip replacement is more accurate than with the posterior approach.在前路微创髋关节置换术中,透视评估比后路手术更准确。
Int Orthop. 2016 Jan;40(1):21-7. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2803-x. Epub 2015 May 10.
5
The Learning Curve From Converting From Fluoroscopic to Robotic-Assisted Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty.从透视引导到机器人辅助直接前侧全髋关节置换的学习曲线。
Surg Technol Int. 2024 Jul 15;44:311-319. doi: 10.52198/24.STI.44.OS1772.
6
Does fluoroscopy with anterior hip arthroplasty decrease acetabular cup variability compared with a nonguided posterior approach?与非导向的后入路相比,髋关节置换术前路透视是否会降低髋臼杯的可变性?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jun;472(6):1877-85. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3512-2. Epub 2014 Feb 19.
7
Error of intraoperative measurement of stem anteversion is decreased by measuring in neutral hip position during total hip arthroplasty.在全髋关节置换术中,于中立髋位测量可减少术中测量股骨前倾角的误差。
J Orthop Sci. 2024 Sep;29(5):1235-1241. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2023.08.008. Epub 2023 Aug 16.
8
Utility of Intraoperative Fluoroscopic Positioning of Total Hip Arthroplasty Components Using a Posterior and Direct Anterior Approach.使用后入路和直接前入路对全髋关节置换组件进行术中透视定位的效用
Mil Med. 2022 Jan 4;187(1-2):e11-e16. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usaa415.
9
Intraoperative Fluoroscopy Improves Component Position During Anterior Hip Arthroplasty.术中透视可改善髋关节前侧置换术中假体组件的位置。
Orthopedics. 2015 Nov;38(11):e970-5. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20151020-04.
10
Does Intraoperative Fluoroscopy Improve Limb-Length Discrepancy and Acetabular Component Positioning During Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty?术中透视是否能改善直接前路全髋关节置换术中肢体长度差异和髋臼组件位置?
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Sep;33(9):2927-2931. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.05.004. Epub 2018 May 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Accuracy of intraoperative estimation of femoral stem anteversion in cementless total hip arthroplasty by using a digital protractor and a spirit level.术中使用数字量角器和水平仪测量非骨水泥全髋关节置换术中股骨柄前倾角的准确性。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Jan 7;16(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-02183-7.
2
Traction table versus standard table total hip arthroplasty through the direct anterior approach: a systematic review.直接前入路中牵引床与标准手术台行全髋关节置换术的比较:系统评价。
Hip Int. 2020 Nov;30(6):662-672. doi: 10.1177/1120700019900987. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
3
Effect of altered proximal femoral geometry on predicting femoral stem anteversion in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip.
股骨近端几何形状改变对预测发育性髋关节发育不良患者股骨柄前倾角的影响。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Dec 9;14(1):420. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1491-4.
4
Does fluoroscopy with anterior hip arthroplasty decrease acetabular cup variability compared with a nonguided posterior approach?与非导向的后入路相比,髋关节置换术前路透视是否会降低髋臼杯的可变性?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jun;472(6):1877-85. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3512-2. Epub 2014 Feb 19.
5
Intraoperative estimation of femoral anteversion in cementless total hip arthroplasty using the lesser trochanter.在非骨水泥全髋关节置换术中使用小转子对股骨前倾角进行术中评估。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011 Sep;131(9):1317-23. doi: 10.1007/s00402-011-1282-9. Epub 2011 Feb 27.
6
A comparison of surgeon estimation and computed tomographic measurement of femoral component anteversion in cementless total hip arthroplasty.非骨水泥型全髋关节置换术中外科医生估计与股骨假体前倾角的计算机断层扫描测量的比较。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Nov;91(11):2598-604. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01225.
7
Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion.全髋关节组件的顺应性定位以实现最佳运动范围。
J Orthop Res. 2004 Jul;22(4):815-21. doi: 10.1016/j.orthres.2003.11.001.