Park Se-Jun, Park Jin-Sung, Kang Dong-Ho, Kang Minwook, Jung Kyunghun, Lee Chong-Suh
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Spine Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Haeundae Bumin Hospital, Busan, South Korea.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2025 Aug 1;50(15):1065-1073. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005151. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
Retrospective study.
To analyze the risk factors for bony proximal junctional failure (B-PJF) and ligamentous PJF (L-PJF) separately after adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery.
Despite numerous studies about the risk factors of PJF, it remains unclear whether the same risk factors can be applied to both B-PJF and L-PJF.
Patients who underwent corrective surgery from low thoracic level (T9-T12) to pelvis with a minimum follow-up duration of 2 years were included in this study. Patients with PJF were divided into 2 groups according to the involvement of bony structure: B-PJF and L-PJF. The control group was created using patients who did not develop PJF for ≥2 years postoperatively (no-PJF group). Risk factors were analyzed by comparing various clinical and radiographic parameters between no PJF versus B-PJF group and between no PJF versus L-PJF groups.
The final study cohort comprised 240 patients. The mean age was 68.7 years, and there were 205 women (85.4%). On average, 8.1 levels were fused. PJF developed in 103 patients, with 70 (68.0%) in the B-PJF group and 33 (32.0%) in the L-PJF group. Stepwise logistic regression analyses revealed that older age (odds ratio [OR]=1.088), higher body mass index (BMI) (OR=1.161), osteoporosis (OR=3.293), greater postoperative lumbar distribution index (OR=1.032), and overcorrection relative to the age-adjusted pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (OR=3.964) were significant risk factors for B-PJF. Meanwhile, no use of a transverse process (TP) hook was the single risk factor for L-PJF (OR=4.724).
Understanding the difference in risk factors between B-PJF and L-PJF will facilitate the optimization of surgical outcomes for patients with ASD. Appropriate correction of sagittal malalignment along with the use of a TP hook is advisable to mitigate both B-PJF and L-PJF development.
回顾性研究。
分别分析成人脊柱畸形(ASD)手术后近端交界性骨失败(B-PJF)和韧带性近端交界性失败(L-PJF)的危险因素。
尽管有许多关于近端交界性失败危险因素的研究,但尚不清楚相同的危险因素是否适用于B-PJF和L-PJF。
本研究纳入了从胸段下部(T9-T12)至骨盆接受矫正手术且随访时间至少为2年的患者。近端交界性失败患者根据骨结构受累情况分为两组:B-PJF组和L-PJF组。对照组采用术后≥2年未发生近端交界性失败的患者(无近端交界性失败组)。通过比较无近端交界性失败组与B-PJF组以及无近端交界性失败组与L-PJF组之间的各种临床和影像学参数来分析危险因素。
最终研究队列包括240例患者。平均年龄为68.7岁,女性205例(85.4%)。平均融合节段为8.1个。103例患者发生近端交界性失败,其中B-PJF组70例(68.0%),L-PJF组33例(32.0%)。逐步逻辑回归分析显示,年龄较大(比值比[OR]=1.088)、体重指数(BMI)较高(OR=1.161)、骨质疏松(OR=3.293)、术后腰椎分布指数较大(OR=1.032)以及相对于年龄调整后的骨盆入射角-腰椎前凸的过度矫正(OR=3.964)是B-PJF的显著危险因素。同时,未使用横突(TP)钩是L-PJF的唯一危险因素(OR=4.724)。
了解B-PJF和L-PJF危险因素的差异将有助于优化ASD患者的手术效果。建议适当矫正矢状面畸形并使用TP钩以减轻B-PJF和L-PJF的发生。