Institut de Combustion, Aérothermique, Réactivité et Environnement (ICARE-CNRS), 1C, av. de la Recherche Scientifique CS 50060 - 45071, Orléans Cedex 2, France; Chromatotec, 15 rue d'Artiguelongue, Saint-Antoine 33240, France.
Chromatotec, 15 rue d'Artiguelongue, Saint-Antoine 33240, France.
J Chromatogr A. 2024 Oct 25;1735:465327. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2024.465327. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
Because of their major role in indoor and outdoor air pollution, even at trace levels, VOCs are of great interest, and their monitoring requires sensitive analytical instruments. Several techniques are commonly used, such as portable sensors, Proton Transfer Reaction Mass Spectrometry (PTR-MS) and Thermal Desorption Gas Chromatography (TD-GC). The latter is widely used off- and on-line with Flame Ionization Detectors (FID) or Mass Spectrometers (MS). Given the large number of molecules detected per chromatogram, the data generated by these monitoring techniques are usually checked and reprocessed manually. This process is extremely time consuming and could result in human error. The challenge is to provide reliable results as quickly as possible. In this study, the performances of an on-line TD-GC system with dual detection FID and MS were tested. The Method Detection Limits (MDL), linearities and accuracies of 60 VOCs (alkanes, aromatics, oxygenated and halogenated) were calculated both for FID and MS detectors. The MDLs and accuracies ranged from 0.006 to 0.618 ppbv and from 77 % to 100 % for FID, and from 0.018 to 0.760 ppbv and from 80 % to 100 % for MS. Both detectors showed good complementarity and allowed the development of two programs to facilitate data analysis. These algorithms were designed to autonomously select optimal results between FID and MS detectors, and were evaluated for outdoor and indoor measurement conditions. Measuring VOCs in field campaigns is challenging, and it is anticipated that these programs could be extended to other types of dual-detector systems or for the comparison of data from different calibrated instruments.
由于挥发性有机化合物在室内和室外空气污染中扮演着重要角色,即使在痕量水平下也是如此,因此它们引起了极大的关注,其监测需要灵敏的分析仪器。几种技术通常被使用,例如便携式传感器、质子转移反应质谱(PTR-MS)和热解吸气相色谱(TD-GC)。后者广泛用于离线和在线与火焰离子化检测器(FID)或质谱仪(MS)联用。由于每个色谱图中检测到的分子数量众多,这些监测技术生成的数据通常需要手动检查和重新处理。这个过程极其耗时,并可能导致人为错误。挑战在于尽快提供可靠的结果。在这项研究中,测试了具有双检测 FID 和 MS 的在线 TD-GC 系统的性能。计算了 FID 和 MS 检测器对 60 种挥发性有机化合物(烷烃、芳烃、含氧和卤代)的方法检测限(MDL)、线性度和准确度。MDL 和准确度范围分别为 FID 的 0.006 至 0.618 ppbv 和 77%至 100%,以及 MS 的 0.018 至 0.760 ppbv 和 80%至 100%。两个检测器都表现出良好的互补性,并允许开发两个程序来方便数据分析。这些算法旨在自动在 FID 和 MS 检测器之间选择最佳结果,并针对户外和室内测量条件进行了评估。在野外测量挥发性有机化合物具有挑战性,预计这些程序可以扩展到其他类型的双检测器系统或用于比较不同校准仪器的数据。