• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全机器人 versus 机器人辅助远端胃癌根治术的短期疗效:单中心回顾性研究。

Short-term outcomes of totally robotic versus robotic-assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a single-center retrospective study.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, No. 17 Yongwaizheng Street, Nanchang, Jiangxi Province, 330006, China.

出版信息

World J Surg Oncol. 2024 Sep 4;22(1):230. doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03484-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12957-024-03484-5
PMID:39232702
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11373196/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Totally robotic distal gastrectomy (TRDG) is being used more and more in gastric cancer (GC) patients. The study aims to evaluate the short-term efficacy of TRDG and robotic-assisted distal gastrectomy (RADG) in the treatment of GC.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected the clinical data of patients who underwent TRDG or RADG, of which 60 patients were included in the study: 30 cases of totally robotic and 30 cases of robotic-assisted. The short-term efficacy of the two groups was compared.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the clinicopathological data between the two groups. Compared to RADG, TRDG had less intraoperative blood loss(P = 0.019), less postoperative abdominal drainage(P = 0.031), shorter time of exhaust( P = 0.001) and liquid diet(P = 0.001), shorter length of incision(P<0.01), shorter postoperative hospital stays(P = 0.033), lower postoperative C-reactive protein(CRP)(P = 0.024) and lower postoperative Visual Analogue Scale(VAS) scores(P = 0.048). However, no significant statistical differences were found in terms of total operation time(P = 0.108), number of lymph nodes retrieved(P = 0.307), time for anastomosis(P = 0.450), proximal resection margin(P = 0.210), distal resection margin(P = 0.202), postoperative complication(P = 0.506), total hospital cost(P = 0.286) and postoperative white blood cell(WBC)(P = 0.113).

CONCLUSIONS

In terms of security and technology, TRDG could serve as a better treatment method for GC.

摘要

背景

全机器人辅助远端胃切除术(TRDG)在胃癌(GC)患者中应用越来越多。本研究旨在评估 TRDG 和机器人辅助远端胃切除术(RADG)治疗 GC 的短期疗效。

方法

我们回顾性收集了接受 TRDG 或 RADG 的患者的临床资料,其中 60 例患者纳入研究:30 例全机器人组和 30 例机器人辅助组。比较两组的短期疗效。

结果

两组患者的临床病理资料无显著差异。与 RADG 相比,TRDG 术中出血量更少(P=0.019),术后腹腔引流更少(P=0.031),排气时间更短(P=0.001)和开始进液时间更短(P=0.001),切口长度更短(P<0.01),术后住院时间更短(P=0.033),术后 C 反应蛋白(CRP)更低(P=0.024),术后视觉模拟评分(VAS)评分更低(P=0.048)。但总手术时间(P=0.108)、淋巴结检出数(P=0.307)、吻合时间(P=0.450)、近端切缘(P=0.210)、远端切缘(P=0.202)、术后并发症(P=0.506)、总住院费用(P=0.286)和术后白细胞(WBC)计数(P=0.113)差异均无统计学意义。

结论

就安全性和技术而言,TRDG 可以作为 GC 的一种更好的治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Short-term outcomes of totally robotic versus robotic-assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a single-center retrospective study.全机器人 versus 机器人辅助远端胃癌根治术的短期疗效:单中心回顾性研究。
World J Surg Oncol. 2024 Sep 4;22(1):230. doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03484-5.
2
Short- and long-term outcomes of totally robotic versus robotic-assisted radical distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a mono-institution retrospective study.全机器人与机器人辅助根治性远端胃切除术治疗进展期胃癌的近期和远期疗效:单中心回顾性研究。
World J Surg Oncol. 2019 Nov 11;17(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s12957-019-1722-5.
3
Totally Robotic Distal Gastrectomy: A Safe and Feasible Minimally Invasive Technique for Gastric Cancer Patients Who Undergo Distal Gastrectomy.全机器人辅助远端胃切除术:一种安全可行的微创技术,适用于接受远端胃切除术的胃癌患者。
Dig Surg. 2020;37(5):360-367. doi: 10.1159/000507809. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
4
Body image and quality of life undergoing totally robotic versus robotic-assisted distal gastrectomy: a retrospective propensity score matched cohort study.全机器人与机器人辅助远端胃切除术对体像和生活质量的影响:一项回顾性倾向评分匹配队列研究。
BMC Surg. 2024 Oct 9;24(1):295. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02597-8.
5
[Comparison of short-term efficacy between robotic and 3D laparoscopic-assisted D2 radical distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer].机器人与3D腹腔镜辅助胃癌D2根治性远端胃切除术的短期疗效比较
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Apr 25;23(4):350-356. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20200224-00085.
6
Short-term outcomes of robotic- versus laparoscopic-assisted Total Gastrectomy for advanced gastric Cancer: a propensity score matching study.机器人辅助与腹腔镜辅助全胃切除术治疗进展期胃癌的短期疗效:倾向评分匹配研究。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Jul 17;20(1):669. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07160-1.
7
Robotic- versus laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for advanced gastric cancer based on propensity score matching: short-term outcomes at a high-capacity center.基于倾向评分匹配的机器人辅助与腹腔镜辅助进展期胃癌 D2 淋巴结清扫术:大容量中心的短期疗效。
Sci Rep. 2020 Apr 16;10(1):6502. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-63616-1.
8
Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: comparison of short-term surgical outcomes.机器人手术与腹腔镜手术治疗胃癌:短期手术结果比较
Surg Endosc. 2016 Feb;30(2):574-580. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4241-7. Epub 2015 Jul 25.
9
[Application of robotic and laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy to gastric cancer patients with body mass index ≥24 kg/m].机器人辅助及腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术在体重指数≥24kg/m²的胃癌患者中的应用
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Mar 25;21(3):318-324.
10
Robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for advanced gastric cancer: short-term outcomes at a mono-institution.机器人辅助与传统腹腔镜辅助D2淋巴结清扫全胃切除术治疗进展期胃癌:单中心短期疗效
BMC Surg. 2019 Jul 9;19(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12893-019-0549-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.2022 年全球癌症统计数据:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率全球估计数。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2024 May-Jun;74(3):229-263. doi: 10.3322/caac.21834. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
2
Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines 2021 (6th edition).日本胃癌治疗指南 2021(第 6 版)。
Gastric Cancer. 2023 Jan;26(1):1-25. doi: 10.1007/s10120-022-01331-8. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
3
Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of the Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer.基于倾向评分匹配的胃癌行机器人与腹腔镜胃切除术短期和长期结局分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Jun;29(6):3887-3895. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-11203-7. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
4
Inflammation-Induced Tumorigenesis and Metastasis.炎症诱导的肿瘤发生和转移。
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 May 21;22(11):5421. doi: 10.3390/ijms22115421.
5
Comparison of short-term outcomes and quality of life in totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy and totally robotic distal gastrectomy for clinical stage I-III gastric cancer: study protocol for a multi-institutional randomised clinical trial.临床Ⅰ-Ⅲ期胃癌行全腹腔镜与全机器人辅助远端胃切除术的短期疗效和生活质量比较:多中心随机临床试验研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 May 25;11(5):e043535. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043535.
6
Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: The largest meta-analysis.机器人与腹腔镜胃癌手术:最大荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2020 Oct;82:210-228. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.07.053. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
7
Clinical Outcomes of Robotic Surgery Compared to Conventional Surgical Approaches (Laparoscopic or Open): A Systematic Overview of Reviews.机器人手术与传统手术方法(腹腔镜或开放)的临床结局比较:系统综述。
Ann Surg. 2021 Mar 1;273(3):467-473. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003915.
8
Robotic- versus laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for advanced gastric cancer based on propensity score matching: short-term outcomes at a high-capacity center.基于倾向评分匹配的机器人辅助与腹腔镜辅助进展期胃癌 D2 淋巴结清扫术:大容量中心的短期疗效。
Sci Rep. 2020 Apr 16;10(1):6502. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-63616-1.
9
Short- and long-term outcomes of totally robotic versus robotic-assisted radical distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a mono-institution retrospective study.全机器人与机器人辅助根治性远端胃切除术治疗进展期胃癌的近期和远期疗效:单中心回顾性研究。
World J Surg Oncol. 2019 Nov 11;17(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s12957-019-1722-5.
10
Should robotic gastrectomy become a standard surgical treatment option for gastric cancer?机器人胃切除术是否应该成为胃癌的标准手术治疗选择?
Surg Today. 2020 Sep;50(9):955-965. doi: 10.1007/s00595-019-01875-w. Epub 2019 Sep 11.