• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于可穿戴生命体征监测设备的分段交替轮班模式在2019冠状病毒病期间的有效性评估:一项横断面研究。

Evaluation of the effectiveness of a segmented alternating shift pattern based on wearable vital signs monitoring devices during COVID-19: a cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Xie Meilian, Zhang Zhiyun, Jin Ronghua, Chen Xiaoyou, Liu Zhe, Ma Jianping, Qiao Wenying

机构信息

Nursing Management Department, Beijing Ditan Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

National Center for Infectious Disease, Beijing Ditan Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

BMC Nurs. 2024 Sep 4;23(1):620. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02274-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12912-024-02274-4
PMID:39232772
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11375973/
Abstract

AIM

To explore the feasibility and effectiveness of an alternating shift pattern in two-hour segments in the state of emergency management of public health events.

METHODS

A cross-sectional research design was conducted in our study. The nursing staff working in the admission ward of suspected or confirmed patients with COVID-19 in December 2022 were selected as subjects by the whole-group sampling method. We adopted a shift pattern of alternating shifts every two-hour in the isolation wards. The vital signs parameters were captured by uniformly wearing the multi-signs sensing devices, and the questionnaires collected the symptoms.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven female participants, with a mean age of 33.09 ± 5.96 years, were included in this study. Measurements of body temperature (T), blood oxygen saturation (SpO), respiratory rate (RR), and heart rate (HR) while wearing personal protective equipment (PPE) all remained within normal limits. None of the nurses reported sweating, dizziness, blurred vision, palpitations, or dyspnea. Statistical analysis showed significant differences between the critical care group and the non-critical care group in terms of age (P = 0.041), working duration (P = 0.036), and the total number of entries into isolation areas for nursing care (rounds) (P = 0.007). However, there were no statistically significant differences in vital signs based on age, work duration, or body mass index (BMI). The data indicated a notable increase in body temperature compared to other vital sign parameters with increasing work time while wearing PPE. Body temperature approached the upper limit when working close to 2 h long.

CONCLUSIONS

The alternating shift pattern in two-hour segments can effectively maintain the physical well-being of nurses wearing PPE without increasing the burden on nursing staff or the wastage of protective materials. This approach is recommended for addressing similar public health events in the future.

摘要

目的

探讨在突发公共卫生事件应急管理状态下两小时分段交替轮班模式的可行性和有效性。

方法

本研究采用横断面研究设计。通过整群抽样法选取2022年12月在新型冠状病毒肺炎疑似或确诊患者收治病房工作的护理人员作为研究对象。在隔离病房采用每两小时交替轮班的模式。通过统一佩戴多体征传感设备采集生命体征参数,通过问卷收集症状。

结果

本研究纳入67名女性参与者,平均年龄为33.09±5.96岁。佩戴个人防护装备(PPE)时的体温(T)、血氧饱和度(SpO)、呼吸频率(RR)和心率(HR)测量值均保持在正常范围内。没有护士报告出汗、头晕、视力模糊、心悸或呼吸困难。统计分析显示,重症护理组和非重症护理组在年龄(P = 0.041)、工作时长(P = 0.036)以及进入隔离区进行护理的总次数(轮次)(P = 0.007)方面存在显著差异。然而,基于年龄、工作时长或体重指数(BMI)的生命体征没有统计学上的显著差异。数据表明,与其他生命体征参数相比,佩戴PPE工作时间增加时体温显著升高。工作接近2小时时体温接近上限。

结论

两小时分段交替轮班模式可以有效维持佩戴PPE护士的身体健康,而不会增加护理人员的负担或防护物资的浪费。建议采用这种方法应对未来类似的突发公共卫生事件。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0616/11375973/dce775cd384a/12912_2024_2274_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0616/11375973/6d6405d6aaae/12912_2024_2274_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0616/11375973/7637d3a3df96/12912_2024_2274_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0616/11375973/dce775cd384a/12912_2024_2274_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0616/11375973/6d6405d6aaae/12912_2024_2274_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0616/11375973/7637d3a3df96/12912_2024_2274_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0616/11375973/dce775cd384a/12912_2024_2274_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of the effectiveness of a segmented alternating shift pattern based on wearable vital signs monitoring devices during COVID-19: a cross-sectional study.基于可穿戴生命体征监测设备的分段交替轮班模式在2019冠状病毒病期间的有效性评估:一项横断面研究。
BMC Nurs. 2024 Sep 4;23(1):620. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02274-4.
2
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
The Evaluation of Physiological Index Changes and Safety Work of Female Medical Staff With Different Medical Protection Standards in the Ward of COVID-19.新型冠状病毒肺炎病房中不同医疗防护标准下女性医护人员生理指标变化及安全性工作的评估
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jun 22;9:906140. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.906140. eCollection 2022.
5
The Impact of Personal Protective Equipment on Healthcare Workers on COVID-19 Duty in a Tertiary Care Hospital in South India.个人防护装备对印度南部一家三级护理医院中参与COVID-19防治工作的医护人员的影响
Cureus. 2023 Jul 14;15(7):e41910. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41910. eCollection 2023 Jul.
6
Problems Encountered by Nurses Due to the Use of Personal Protective Equipment During the Coronavirus Pandemic: Results of a Survey.冠状病毒大流行期间护士因使用个人防护装备而遇到的问题:一项调查结果
Wound Manag Prev. 2020 Oct;66(10):12-16.
7
[Standard technical specifications for methacholine chloride (Methacholine) bronchial challenge test (2023)].[氯化乙酰甲胆碱支气管激发试验标准技术规范(2023年)]
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2024 Feb 12;47(2):101-119. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112147-20231019-00247.
8
Health care workers' experience of personal protective equipment use and associated adverse effects during the COVID-19 pandemic response in Singapore.新加坡应对 COVID-19 大流行期间医护人员个人防护装备使用及相关不良影响的体验。
J Adv Nurs. 2022 Aug;78(8):2383-2396. doi: 10.1111/jan.15164. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
9
Impact of personal protective equipment attached powered air-purifying respirator on nursing-skill performance and psychosocial stress of intensive care unit COVID-19 nurses: A cross-sectional study.个人防护装备附接动力空气净化呼吸器对 ICU COVID-19 护士护理技能表现和心理社会压力的影响:一项横断面研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2023 Jun;32(11-12):2922-2932. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16686. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
10
The effects of nurses' use of personal protective equipment on their vital signs during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间护士使用个人防护装备对其生命体征的影响。
Work. 2022;71(4):843-850. doi: 10.3233/WOR-211232.

本文引用的文献

1
Factors influencing nurse fatigue during COVID-19: regression vs. fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis.影响 COVID-19 期间护士疲劳的因素:回归与模糊集定性比较分析。
Front Public Health. 2023 Aug 17;11:1184702. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1184702. eCollection 2023.
2
Cellular Senescence in Cardiovascular Diseases: A Systematic Review.心血管疾病中的细胞衰老:一项系统综述
Aging Dis. 2022 Feb 1;13(1):103-128. doi: 10.14336/AD.2021.0927. eCollection 2022 Feb.
3
COVID-19 pandemic effects on health worker's mental health: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
COVID-19 大流行对卫生工作者心理健康的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Psychiatry. 2022 Jan 21;65(1):e10. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.1.
4
Experiences of frontline nurse managers during the COVID-19: A qualitative study.一线护士管理者在 COVID-19 期间的经历:一项定性研究。
J Nurs Manag. 2022 Jan;30(1):79-89. doi: 10.1111/jonm.13488. Epub 2021 Oct 24.
5
Associations between personal protective equipment and nursing staff stress during the COVID-19 pandemic.个人防护装备与 COVID-19 大流行期间护理人员压力之间的关联。
J Nurs Manag. 2021 Nov;29(8):2374-2382. doi: 10.1111/jonm.13400. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
6
The experiences of critical care nurses caring for patients with COVID-19 during the 2020 pandemic: A qualitative study.《2020 年大流行期间,重症监护护士照顾 COVID-19 患者的体验:一项定性研究》
Appl Nurs Res. 2021 Jun;59:151418. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2021.151418. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
7
A Nurse's Guide to COVID-19.《护士 COVID-19 指南》
Am J Nurs. 2021 Mar 1;121(3):28-38. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000737172.16000.3e.
8
Strategies and resources for nurse leaders to use to lead with empathy and prudence so they understand and address sources of anxiety among nurses practising in the era of COVID-19.护士领导者在领导时运用同理心和谨慎的策略和资源,以便了解并解决在 COVID-19 时代执业的护士的焦虑来源。
J Clin Nurs. 2021 Jan;30(1-2):298-305. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15520. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
9
Healthcare workers experience in dealing with Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic.医护人员应对冠状病毒(COVID-19)大流行的经验。
Saudi Med J. 2020 Jun;41(6):657-660. doi: 10.15537/smj.2020.6.25101.
10
Association of body temperature with obesity. The CoLaus study.体温与肥胖的关系。科劳研究。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2019 May;43(5):1026-1033. doi: 10.1038/s41366-018-0218-7. Epub 2018 Sep 24.