超重和肥胖的膝骨关节炎成年人减肥干预措施的比较:一项随机试验的系统评价和网状Meta分析
Comparison of weight loss interventions in overweight and obese adults with knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials.
作者信息
Shahid Arashi, Thirumaran Aricia Jieqi, Christensen Robin, Venkatesha Venkatesha, Henriksen Marius, Bowden Jocelyn L, Hunter David J
机构信息
Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, Kolling Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2065, Australia; National Institute of Food Science and Technology, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan; Section for Biostatistics and Evidence-Based Research, the Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark; Rheumatology Department, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW 2065, Australia.
Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, Kolling Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2065, Australia; Nepean Hospital, Kingswood, NSW 2747, Australia.
出版信息
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2025 Apr;33(4):518-529. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2024.08.012. Epub 2024 Sep 2.
OBJECTIVE
To ascertain the comparative effectiveness of weight-loss strategies for osteoarthritis (OA) to develop rational treatment algorithms aimed at improving OA-related symptoms in overweight/obese individuals.
DESIGN
Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from inception to June 2023 for observational studies and randomized trials. Network meta-analyses were performed using a frequentist approach. Effect sizes for pain and function were computed as standardized mean differences, while change in body weight was computed as mean differences.
RESULTS
13 RCTs on knee OA (KOA) (2800 participants) with 7 interventions: diet (D); exercise (E); diet and exercise (DE); pharmacological (L); psychological (P); psychological, diet, and exercise (PDE); and Mediterranean diets (M) were networked. For weight change (kg), all interventions significantly outperformed control comparators, with effect sizes ranging from -11.2 (95% CI, -16.0, -6.5 kg) for the most effective approach (PDE) to -4.7 (95% CI, -6.7, -2.7 kg) for the least effective approach (DE). In terms of pain (0-20 scale), only DE outperformed control comparators (-2.2, 95% CI: -4.1, -0.21), whereas PDE was not superior to control comparators (-3.9, 95% CI: -8.4, 0.5) in improving the pain. Regardless of the chosen intervention, prediction intervals from meta-regression analysis indicate that significant pain relief may be anticipated when patients achieve at least a weight reduction of 7%.
CONCLUSIONS
PDE and DE interventions may offer the most effective approach for weight loss, potentially leading to improvements in pain and physical function among overweight/obese individuals with KOA if they achieve more than 7% weight loss.
目的
确定骨关节炎(OA)减肥策略的相对有效性,以制定合理的治疗方案,旨在改善超重/肥胖个体中与OA相关的症状。
设计
检索Medline、Embase、CINAHL、Scopus和Web of Science数据库,从建库至2023年6月,查找观察性研究和随机试验。采用频率学派方法进行网状Meta分析。疼痛和功能的效应量计算为标准化均数差,而体重变化计算为均数差。
结果
纳入13项关于膝骨关节炎(KOA)的随机对照试验(RCT)(2800名参与者),涉及7种干预措施:饮食(D);运动(E);饮食和运动(DE);药物治疗(L);心理治疗(P);心理、饮食和运动(PDE);以及地中海饮食(M),并进行网状分析。对于体重变化(kg),所有干预措施均显著优于对照比较组,效应量范围从最有效方法(PDE)的-11.2(95%CI,-16.0,-6.5 kg)到最无效方法(DE)的-4.7(95%CI,-6.7,-2.7 kg)。在疼痛方面(0-20分),只有DE优于对照比较组(-2.2,95%CI:-4.1,-0.21),而PDE在改善疼痛方面并不优于对照比较组(-3.9,95%CI:-8.4,0.5)。无论选择何种干预措施,Meta回归分析的预测区间表明,当患者体重至少减轻7%时,可能会预期显著的疼痛缓解。
结论
PDE和DE干预措施可能提供最有效的减肥方法,如果超重/肥胖的KOA个体体重减轻超过7%,可能会改善疼痛和身体功能。