• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国帽儿山不同种源栽植红松生长差异。

Growth difference of planted from different provenances in Maoer Mountain, China.

机构信息

College of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University/Key Laboratory of Sustainable Forest Ecosystem Management, Ministry of Education, Harbin 150040, China.

出版信息

Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2024 Jul 18;35(7):1735-1743. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202407.006.

DOI:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202407.006
PMID:39233401
Abstract

In order to analyze the growth pattern of tree height of planted and screen the provenances with fastest growth, we grouped the provenances using the differences in tree height, diameter at breast height (DBH) and volume of timber of 234 individuals of planted from 26 provenances in Maoershan Experimental Forest Farm. We constructed the growth equation for tree height by combining the base models of Gompertz, Korf, Richards, Logistic, and Schumacher, and then selected the optimal one. We introduced the prove-nance grouping as a dummy variable into the base model, and evaluated the optimal tree height growth equation by a comprehensive evaluation of the model according to the coefficient of determination (), the root-mean-square error (RMSE), the Akaikei Information Criterion (AIC), and the model's predictive precision (). The results showed that the growth traits of the 26 provenances had significant difference among the groups, and that tree height and DBH showed significant differences among the provenances. According to the comprehensive consideration of different growth traits, the four groups of provenance growth were divided into group A (Wuying, Hebei, Linjiang, Dongfanghong, Huanan, Lushuihe, Fangzheng) >group B (Aihuisanzhan, Liangshui, Tieli, Qinghe) > group C (Wuyiling, Zhanhe, Liangzihe, Baihe, Chaihe, Caohekou, Bajiazi) >group D (Tongzigou, Dashitou, Wangqing, Helong, Yanshou, Dahailin, Xiaobeihu, Muling). The optimal base tree height growth model of the four groups was the Gompertz model, and the fitting accuracy of the model after the introduction of dummy variables (=0.9353) was higher than that of the base model (=0.9303), and the model prediction accuracy was also improved. The tree height growth curves of each provenance group conformed to the "S"-shaped rule of change. There were obvious differences among the groups, with the best performance of the provenances in group A. The growth of from different provenances was different, and the tree height growth model with dummy variables of provenance groups could effectively improve the prediction accuracy of the model, reflect the differences in height growth of of different provenances, which could provide the scientific basis for the selection and cultivation of plantations.

摘要

为了分析人工林树木树高生长模式,并筛选生长最快的种源,我们利用毛儿山实验林场 26 个种源的 234 株人工林树木的树高、胸径(DBH)和材积的差异,对种源进行了分组。我们通过结合 Gompertz、Korf、Richards、Logistic 和 Schumacher 基本模型,构建了树高生长方程,并根据决定系数 ()、均方根误差 (RMSE)、赤池信息量准则 (AIC) 和模型预测精度 (),对基本模型引入种源分组作为虚拟变量进行综合评价,选择最优的树高生长方程。结果表明,26 个种源的生长特性在组间存在显著差异,树高和 DBH 在种源间存在显著差异。根据不同生长特性的综合考虑,将 4 组种源的生长分为组 A(五营、河北、临江、东方红、华南、露水河、方正)>组 B(爱辉山站、凉水、铁力、清河)>组 C(五营岭、沾河、亮子河、白河、柴河、曹大口、八家子)>组 D(佟子沟、大石头、汪清、和龙、延寿、大海林、小北湖、穆棱)。4 组的最优基本树高生长模型均为 Gompertz 模型,引入虚拟变量后模型的拟合精度(=0.9353)高于基本模型(=0.9303),且模型预测精度也有所提高。各种源组的树高生长曲线符合“S”型变化规律。组间差异明显,种源 A 组表现最好。不同种源的生长情况不同,引入种源组虚拟变量的树高生长模型可以有效提高模型的预测精度,反映不同种源树木的高度生长差异,为人工林树木的选择和培育提供科学依据。

相似文献

1
Growth difference of planted from different provenances in Maoer Mountain, China.中国帽儿山不同种源栽植红松生长差异。
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2024 Jul 18;35(7):1735-1743. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202407.006.
2
[Prediction of liberation cutting intensity effect on the growth of Korean pine in secondary forest based on double dummy variable model].基于双重虚拟变量模型预测抚育采伐强度对次生林红松生长的影响
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2024 Jun;35(6):1463-1473. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202406.004.
3
[Construction of the additive model system for heartwood, sapwoodand bark taper of plantation in different regions of Heilongjiang Province, China].[中国黑龙江省不同地区人工林心材、边材和树皮锥度加性模型系统的构建]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2021 Oct;32(10):3437-3447. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202110.029.
4
Construction of universal equations for knot attributes of three coniferous species.构建三种针叶树属树种结的属性通用方程。
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2023 Nov;34(11):2907-2918. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202311.001.
5
[Branch quantity distribution simulation for Pinus koraiensis plantation in Heilongjiang Pro-vince, China.].[中国黑龙江省红松人工林枝条数量分布模拟。]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2016 Jul;27(7):2172-2180. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201607.021.
6
[Competition among dominant tree species in a natural spruce-fir forest in Changbai Mountain].[长白山天然云冷杉林优势树种间的竞争]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2016 Oct;27(10):3089-3097. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201610.015.
7
[Effect of opening degree regulation on diameter and height increment and aboveground biomass of Korean pine trees planted under secondary forest].[林窗开度调控对次生林下栽植红松直径、树高生长及地上生物量的影响]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2011 Nov;22(11):2781-91.
8
[Competition of key tree species with selective cutting at different intensities in broadleaved-korean pine mixed forest in the Changbai Mountain, China.].[中国长白山阔叶红松混交林不同强度择伐下主要树种的竞争]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2019 May;30(5):1469-1478. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201905.017.
9
[Responses of radial growth of from different provenances to climate at Maoershan in Northeast China].[中国东北帽儿山不同种源树木径向生长对气候的响应]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2024 May;35(5):1159-1168. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202405.004.
10
[Spatial pattern and regeneration characteristics of main woody species in natural secondary forest in Maoershan, Northeast China.].[中国东北帽儿山天然次生林主要木本植物空间格局及更新特征]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2019 Jun;30(6):1945-1955. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201906.026.