Suppr超能文献

直接进行手术的直肠癌患者基线磁共振成像分期的准确性

Accuracy of Baseline Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Staging Rectal Cancer Patients Proceeding Directly to Surgery.

作者信息

Milanzi Elasma, Pelly Rachel M, Hayes Ian P, Gibbs Peter, Faragher Ian, Reece Jeanette C

机构信息

Neuroepidemiology Unit, Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia.

Colorectal Surgery Unit, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

J Surg Oncol. 2024 Dec;130(8):1674-1682. doi: 10.1002/jso.27852. Epub 2024 Sep 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) accuracy for staging preoperative rectal cancer varies across studies. We examined MRI accuracy for T- and N-staging of rectal cancer compared with final histopathology of the resected specimen in a large Australian cohort who did not receive neoadjuvant therapy or radiation.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of prospectively-collected clinical data from 153 rectal adenocarcinomas locally staged by high-resolution MRI between January 2012 and December 2019 that did not undergo chemoradiotherapy or radiation before surgery. T- and N-stage agreement between MRI and final histopathology was assessed using Kappa statistic. Agreement at each T-stage was evaluated using log-linear modeling. N-staging accuracy was examined using positive and negative predictive values.

RESULTS

Overall agreement between MRI and final histopathology for T-stage and N-stage was 55% and 65%, respectively. Kappa statistic found higher agreement between MRI and final histopathology for T-staging (κ = 0.33) versus N-staging (κ = 0.18). MRI correctly assessed 91% of T1 tumors, 43% of T2 tumors, 65% of T3 tumors, and 80% of T4 tumors. MRI accuracy was higher for N-negative tumors (74.1%) than for N-positive tumors (44.4%).

CONCLUSION

MRI is moderately accurate at staging T1, T3, and T4 rectal tumors but caution when staging tumors as T2 is advised. Greater accuracy for staging N-negative versus N-positive tumors is indicated.

摘要

背景与目的

不同研究中,术前直肠癌分期的高分辨率磁共振成像(MRI)准确性存在差异。我们在一个未接受新辅助治疗或放疗的大型澳大利亚队列中,将直肠癌T分期和N分期的MRI准确性与切除标本的最终组织病理学结果进行了比较。

方法

对2012年1月至2019年12月期间前瞻性收集的153例局部经高分辨率MRI分期的直肠腺癌临床数据进行回顾性分析,这些患者术前未接受放化疗或放疗。使用Kappa统计量评估MRI与最终组织病理学之间的T分期和N分期一致性。使用对数线性模型评估每个T分期的一致性。通过阳性和阴性预测值检查N分期准确性。

结果

MRI与最终组织病理学在T分期和N分期的总体一致性分别为55%和65%。Kappa统计量显示,MRI与最终组织病理学在T分期(κ = 0.33)方面的一致性高于N分期(κ = 0.18)。MRI正确评估了91%的T1肿瘤、43%的T2肿瘤、65%的T3肿瘤和80%的T4肿瘤。MRI对N阴性肿瘤的准确性(74.1%)高于N阳性肿瘤(44.4%)。

结论

MRI对T1、T3和T4期直肠肿瘤分期具有中等准确性,但在将肿瘤分期为T2时建议谨慎。结果表明,MRI对N阴性肿瘤分期的准确性高于N阳性肿瘤。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/edb1/11849709/6c99fb39a66f/JSO-130-1674-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验