• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估并比较口腔鳞状细胞癌患者采用科罗拉多微解剖针、手术刀片和切割电灼术进行颈部皮肤清扫切口的效果：一项前瞻性研究。

To assess and compare the outcomes of the cutaneous neck dissection incision taken by colorado microdissection needle, surgical blade and cutting electrocautery in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma: A prospective study.

作者信息

Mishra Priyatam, Bhola Nitin, Agarwal Anchal, Mathur Mrinalini, Pillai Saurabh, Chakraborty Raj K, Kangloo Shubhanshi

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Sharad Pawar Dental College, Wardha, Maharashtra, India.

出版信息

Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2024 May-Aug;15(2):233-238. doi: 10.4103/njms.njms_194_22. Epub 2024 Jul 24.

DOI:10.4103/njms.njms_194_22
PMID:39234129
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11371293/
Abstract

AIM

To assess and compare the outcomes of the cutaneous neck dissection incisions taken by Colorado microdissection needle, surgical blade and cutting electrocautery in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective, randomized control, comparative study was carried out on 21 patients. These patients were divided into 3 groups containing 7 patients in each group. The intra operative and post operative outcomes were evaluated. Statistical analysis was done by using descriptive and inferential statistics using Chisquare test, Fisher's Exact Test, one way ANOVA and multiple comparison Tukey Test and software used in the analysis were SPSS 27.0 version and GraphPad Prism 7.0 version and < 0.05 is considered as level of significance.

RESULTS

The time taken for placing cutaneous skin incision and blood loss was more in the surgical blade group as compared to the Colorado microdissection needle and electrocautery. Statistically no significant difference between the three group while comparing the cutaneous neck incision healing and post operative scar formation.

CONCLUSION

This study proves the superiority of the Colorado microdissection needle in terms of time taken and blood loss with similar aesthetic outcome in terms of cutaneous wound healing and post operative scar formation when compared to surgical blade and cutting electrocautery.

摘要

目的

评估并比较口腔鳞状细胞癌患者采用科罗拉多微解剖针、手术刀和切割电灼术进行颈部皮肤切口的效果。

材料与方法

对21例患者进行前瞻性、随机对照、比较性研究。这些患者被分为3组，每组7例。评估术中及术后结果。采用卡方检验、Fisher精确检验、单因素方差分析和多重比较Tukey检验进行描述性和推断性统计分析，分析中使用的软件为SPSS 27.0版和GraphPad Prism 7.0版，P<0.05被视为显著性水平。

结果

与科罗拉多微解剖针和电灼术相比，手术刀组进行颈部皮肤切口的时间和失血量更多。在比较颈部皮肤切口愈合和术后瘢痕形成时，三组之间在统计学上无显著差异。

结论

本研究证明，与手术刀和切割电灼术相比，科罗拉多微解剖针在时间和失血量方面具有优势，在皮肤伤口愈合和术后瘢痕形成方面具有相似的美学效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1261/11371293/6c32dec51aa2/NJMS-15-233-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1261/11371293/7c171f467205/NJMS-15-233-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1261/11371293/e9fb01660481/NJMS-15-233-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1261/11371293/940a5868b667/NJMS-15-233-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1261/11371293/1fc91263bb1d/NJMS-15-233-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1261/11371293/c27b1c37045b/NJMS-15-233-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1261/11371293/f09aeff8592e/NJMS-15-233-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1261/11371293/1c30f5a96753/NJMS-15-233-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1261/11371293/bc03f7f504ec/NJMS-15-233-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1261/11371293/cc16d16b1680/NJMS-15-233-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1261/11371293/ed4d83bd351a/NJMS-15-233-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1261/11371293/43e96c8426c0/NJMS-15-233-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1261/11371293/6c32dec51aa2/NJMS-15-233-g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1261/11371293/7c171f467205/NJMS-15-233-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1261/11371293/e9fb01660481/NJMS-15-233-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1261/11371293/940a5868b667/NJMS-15-233-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1261/11371293/1fc91263bb1d/NJMS-15-233-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1261/11371293/c27b1c37045b/NJMS-15-233-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1261/11371293/f09aeff8592e/NJMS-15-233-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1261/11371293/1c30f5a96753/NJMS-15-233-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1261/11371293/bc03f7f504ec/NJMS-15-233-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1261/11371293/cc16d16b1680/NJMS-15-233-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1261/11371293/ed4d83bd351a/NJMS-15-233-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1261/11371293/43e96c8426c0/NJMS-15-233-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1261/11371293/6c32dec51aa2/NJMS-15-233-g012.jpg

相似文献

1
To assess and compare the outcomes of the cutaneous neck dissection incision taken by colorado microdissection needle, surgical blade and cutting electrocautery in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma: A prospective study.评估并比较口腔鳞状细胞癌患者采用科罗拉多微解剖针、手术刀片和切割电灼术进行颈部皮肤清扫切口的效果：一项前瞻性研究。
Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2024 May-Aug;15(2):233-238. doi: 10.4103/njms.njms_194_22. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
2
Comparing the outcomes of incisions made by colorado microdissection needle, electrosurgery tip, and surgical blade during periodontal surgery: A randomized controlled trial.比较科罗拉多显微解剖针、电外科刀头和手术刀片在牙周手术中所做切口的效果：一项随机对照试验。
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2016 Nov-Dec;20(6):616-622. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_27_17.
3
A Randomized Control Trial to Assess Intraoperative and Postoperative Outcomes of Colorado Microdissection Needle Versus Conventional Surgical Knife in Neck Dissection.一项评估科罗拉多微解剖针与传统手术刀在颈部解剖术中及术后结果的随机对照试验。
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2020 Dec;19(4):506-510. doi: 10.1007/s12663-020-01377-0. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
4
[Clinical application of the Colorado-microdissection needle in neurosurgery].[科罗拉多显微解剖针在神经外科手术中的临床应用]
No Shinkei Geka. 2010 Jun;38(6):539-44.
5
The short-term outcomes of surgical scars in head and neck surgery comparing between surgical blade and geometric electron modulation electrocautery.比较手术刀片和几何电子调制电灼在头颈部手术中对手术疤痕的短期效果。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Oct;281(10):5429-5436. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08771-1. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
6
Comparison of Colorado Needle Electrocautery and Traditional Scalpel for Upper Eyelid Blepharoplasty Incision: A Randomized Controlled Trial and Systematic Review.科罗拉多针状电灼术与传统手术刀在上睑成形术切口中的比较：一项随机对照试验及系统评价
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023 Jun 9;11(6):e5045. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005045. eCollection 2023 Jun.
7
Histologic Comparison of Upper Blepharoplasty Skin Excision Using Scalpel Incision Versus Microdissection Electrocautery Needle Tip Versus Continuous Wave CO2 Laser.使用手术刀切口、显微解剖电灼针尖与连续波二氧化碳激光进行上睑成形术皮肤切除的组织学比较
Dermatol Surg. 2021 Oct 1;47(10):1376-1378. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000003178.
8
Cutting electrocautery versus scalpel for surgical incisions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.手术切口使用电刀切割与手术刀切割的比较：一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Surg Res. 2017 Dec;220:147-163. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.06.093. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
9
A comparative study of surgical outcomes using a Colorado microdissection needle versus standard-size needle electrocautery in one-stage hypospadias repair using a transverse preputial island flap.在使用横向包皮岛状皮瓣进行一期尿道下裂修复术中，比较使用科罗拉多显微解剖针与标准尺寸针状电灼器的手术效果。
Minerva Pediatr. 2018 Feb;70(1):27-34. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4946.16.04314-0. Epub 2015 Jul 8.
10
Safety of colorado microdissection needle (stryker) for skin opening in craniomaxillofacial surgery.科罗拉多显微解剖针（史赛克）在颅颌面外科手术中用于皮肤切开的安全性。
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2012 Mar;11(1):115-8. doi: 10.1007/s12663-011-0179-z. Epub 2011 Mar 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Oral cancer diagnosis and perspectives in India.印度口腔癌的诊断与展望
Sens Int. 2020;1:100046. doi: 10.1016/j.sintl.2020.100046. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
2
A Randomized Control Trial to Assess Intraoperative and Postoperative Outcomes of Colorado Microdissection Needle Versus Conventional Surgical Knife in Neck Dissection.一项评估科罗拉多微解剖针与传统手术刀在颈部解剖术中及术后结果的随机对照试验。
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2020 Dec;19(4):506-510. doi: 10.1007/s12663-020-01377-0. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
3
Cutting electrocautery versus scalpel for surgical incisions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
手术切口使用电刀切割与手术刀切割的比较：一项系统评价与荟萃分析
J Surg Res. 2017 Dec;220:147-163. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.06.093. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
4
Diathermy versus scalpel incisions for hemiarthroplasty for hip fracture: a randomised prospective trial.电热刀与手术刀在髋关节骨折半髋关节置换术中的应用：一项随机前瞻性试验。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Jan;34(Suppl 1):1-4. doi: 10.1007/s00590-007-0220-6. Epub 2007 Jul 25.
5
Systematic review and meta-analysis of electrocautery versus scalpel for surgical skin incisions.电刀与手术刀用于外科切口的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Surg. 2012 Aug;204(2):216-21. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.09.032. Epub 2012 Apr 25.
6
A comparative study of scalpel and surgical diathermy incision in elective operations of head and neck cancer.手术刀与手术电刀在头颈癌择期手术中切口的比较研究
Indian J Cancer. 2011 Apr-Jun;48(2):216-9. doi: 10.4103/0019-509X.82904.
7
Surgical knife.手术刀。
Tex Heart Inst J. 2009;36(5):441-3.
8
Steel scalpel versus electrocautery blade: comparison of cosmetic and patient satisfaction outcomes of different incision methods.手术刀与电灼刀片：不同切口方法的美容效果及患者满意度比较
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009 Aug;38(4):427-33.
9
William T. Bovie and electrosurgery.威廉·T·博维与电外科手术
Surgery. 1996 Apr;119(4):390-6. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6060(96)80137-1.
10
A comparative study of scalpel and electrosurgical incision on subsequent wound healing.
J Pediatr Surg. 1982 Feb;17(1):52-4. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(82)80325-4.