Tokuç Ecem Önder, Karabaş V Levent, Sevik Mehmet Orkun, Kaplan Fatih Bilgehan, Kutlutürk Karagöz Işıl, Kanar Hatice Selen, Yayla Uğur, Sönmez Ayşe Demirciler, Aykut Aslan, Limon Utku, Bozkurt Erdinç, Özsoy Saygın Işılay, Aydoğan Gezginaslan Tuğba, Erçalık Nimet Yeşim, Kumral Türkseven Esra, Aydın Öncü Özlem, Çelik Erkan, Başaran Emengen Ece, Özkaya Abdullah, Öncel Banu Açıkalın, Yenerel Nursal Melda, Şahin Özlem
Kocaeli University School of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Kocaeli, Turkey.
Marmara University School of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Istanbul, Turkey.
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2025 May;35(3):980-989. doi: 10.1177/11206721241280737. Epub 2024 Sep 5.
PurposeThis study aimed to compare the effect of intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) and ranibizumab (IVR) on the maximal diameter of the largest intraretinal cyst (mdIRC), indicating chronicity in patients with diabetic cystoid macular edema (CME).MethodsThis retrospective, comparative study included a subgroup of patients from the MARMASIA Study with treatment-naïve diabetic CME who had IVA (IVA group) or IVR (IVR group) on a pro re nata regimen after a loading dose of 3-monthly injections and followed-up for 24 months. Best-corrected visual acuity (logMAR), central macular thickness (CMT, µm), and mdIRC (µm) and their changes during the study period in the IVA and IVR groups were compared.ResultsA total of 175 eyes (65 [37.1%] in IVA and 110 [62.9%] in IVR group) of 113 patients were included in the study analysis. Both groups had statistically significant improvements in BCVA and CMT during the follow-up (p < 0.05 for all), which were comparable between the groups at each time point. However, the mean reduction in mdIRCs was consistently and significantly higher in the IVA group compared to the IVR group at each follow-up examination (F[1, 3.52] = 6.93, p = 0.009).ConclusionIVA seems to have a greater impact in reducing cyst sizes than IVR in diabetic CME.
目的
本研究旨在比较玻璃体内注射阿柏西普(IVA)和雷珠单抗(IVR)对糖尿病性黄斑囊样水肿(CME)患者最大视网膜内囊肿最大直径(mdIRC)的影响,该指标可指示疾病的慢性程度。
方法
本回顾性比较研究纳入了MARMASIA研究中的一个亚组患者,这些患者为未经治疗的糖尿病性CME患者,在给予3个月一次的负荷剂量注射后,根据病情需要接受IVA(IVA组)或IVR(IVR组)治疗,并随访24个月。比较了IVA组和IVR组在研究期间最佳矫正视力(logMAR)、中心黄斑厚度(CMT,μm)、mdIRC(μm)及其变化情况。
结果
113例患者的175只眼(IVA组65只眼[37.1%],IVR组110只眼[62.9%])纳入研究分析。两组在随访期间BCVA和CMT均有统计学意义的改善(所有p值均<0.05),各时间点两组间相当。然而,在每次随访检查中,IVA组mdIRC的平均降低幅度始终显著高于IVR组(F[1, 3.52]=6.93,p=0.009)。
结论
在糖尿病性CME中,IVA在减小囊肿大小方面似乎比IVR有更大的影响。