State Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Stomatology, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Department of Oral Implantology, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, 237 Luoyu Road, Wuhan, 430079, China.
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Sep 5;28(9):515. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05890-1.
To assess the accuracy and effectiveness among operators with different levels of experience in a robot-assisted immediate implant surgery.
The study included four participants who had received dental training at the same institution but have varying levels of clinical experience in implant dentistry, denoted as undergraduate student (UG), dental resident (DR), specialist with no robot experience (IS) and specialist with robot experience (RS). Following comprehensive theoretical training in robot-assisted implant operation, each operator participated in five robotic-assisted implant procedures at 21 sites, resulting in the implant surgery of a total of 20 implants. Subsequently, the accuracy of the implants was assessed by analyzing the preoperative planning and the postoperative CBCT scans, and the time required for each procedure was also recorded.
Angular deviation in UG, DR, IS and RS group was 0.82 ± 0.27°, 0.55 ± 0.27°, 0.83 ± 0.27°, and 0.56 ± 0.36°, respectively. The total deviation of the implant platform point was 0.28 ± 0.10 mm, 0.26 ± 0.16 mm, 0.34 ± 0.08 mm and 0.31 ± 0.06 mm, respectively. The total deviation of the apical point was 0.30 ± 0.08 mm, 0.25 ± 0.18 mm, 0.31 ± 0.09 mm, and 0.31 ± 0.05 mm, respectively. The time spent was 10.37 ± 0.57 min, 10.56 ± 1.77 min, 9.93 ± 0.78 min, and 11.76 ± 0.78 min for each operator. As the number of operations increased, the operation time decreased, but there was no significant difference in implant accuracy between the different groups.
Within the scope of this study, robot-assisted implant surgery demonstrated high accuracy, with no significant differences in performance between operators with varying levels of clinical experience or implant robot-user experience. Furthermore, the learning curve for robotic implant surgery is steep and consistent.
Robot-assisted implant surgery demonstrates consistent high accuracy across operators of varying clinical and robotic experience levels, highlighting its potential to standardize procedures and enhance predictability in clinical outcomes.
评估不同经验水平的操作员在机器人辅助即刻种植手术中的准确性和效果。
研究纳入了在同一机构接受过牙科培训但在种植牙科临床经验方面存在差异的 4 名参与者,分别为本科生(UG)、牙科住院医师(DR)、无机器人经验的专家(IS)和有机器人经验的专家(RS)。在接受了机器人辅助种植操作的全面理论培训后,每位操作员在 21 个部位进行了 5 次机器人辅助种植手术,总共植入了 20 个种植体。随后,通过分析术前规划和术后 CBCT 扫描来评估植入物的准确性,并记录每个手术的时间。
UG、DR、IS 和 RS 组的角度偏差分别为 0.82±0.27°、0.55±0.27°、0.83±0.27°和 0.56±0.36°。种植体平台点的总偏差分别为 0.28±0.10mm、0.26±0.16mm、0.34±0.08mm 和 0.31±0.06mm。根尖点的总偏差分别为 0.30±0.08mm、0.25±0.18mm、0.31±0.09mm 和 0.31±0.05mm。每位操作员的用时分别为 10.37±0.57min、10.56±1.77min、9.93±0.78min 和 11.76±0.78min。随着手术次数的增加,手术时间减少,但不同组之间植入物的准确性没有显著差异。
在本研究范围内,机器人辅助种植手术具有很高的准确性,具有不同临床经验或植入机器人使用经验的操作员之间的性能没有显著差异。此外,机器人种植手术的学习曲线陡峭且一致。
机器人辅助种植手术在不同临床和机器人经验水平的操作员中表现出一致的高精度,这突出了其在标准化手术和提高临床结果可预测性方面的潜力。