• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探讨中国气候因素与植被生产力的综合联系。

Exploring the comprehensive link between climatic factors and vegetation productivity in China.

机构信息

College of Hydrology and Water Resources, Hohai University, Nanjing, 210098, China.

School of Hydraulic Engineering, Wanjiang University of Technology, Anhui, 243031, China.

出版信息

Int J Biometeorol. 2024 Dec;68(12):2579-2595. doi: 10.1007/s00484-024-02770-x. Epub 2024 Sep 5.

DOI:10.1007/s00484-024-02770-x
PMID:39235598
Abstract

Understanding the influence of climatic factors on vegetation dynamics and cumulative effects is critical for global sustainable development. However, the response of vegetation to climate and the underlying mechanisms in different climatic zones remains unclear. In this study, we analyzed the response of vegetation gross primary productivity (GPP) to climatic factors and the cumulative effects across various vegetation types and climatic zones, utilizing data on precipitation (P), temperature (T), and the standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index (SPEI). The results showed that: (1) GPP showed significant differences among the seven climatic zones, with the highest value observed in zone VII, reaching 1860.07 gC·m, and the lowest in zone I, at 126.03 gC·m. (2) GPP was significantly and positively correlated with temperature in climatic zones I, IV, V, and VI and with precipitation in climatic zones I, II, and IV. Additionally, a significant positive correlated was found between SPEI and GPP in climatic zones I, II, and IV. (3) Drought exerted a cumulative effect on GPP in 45.10% of the regions within China, with an average cumulative duration of 5 months. These effects persisted for 6-8 months in zones I, II, and VII, and for 2-4 months in zones III, IV and VI. Among different vegetation types, forests experienced longest cumulative effect time of 6 months, followed by grasslands (5 months), croplands (4 months), and shrublands (4 months). The cumulative time scale decreased with increasing annual SPEI. The varying responses and accumulation of GPP to drought among different vegetation types in various climatic zones underscore the complexity of vegetation-climate interactions the response and accumulation of GPP to drought.

摘要

理解气候因素对植被动态和累积效应的影响对于全球可持续发展至关重要。然而,植被对气候的响应以及不同气候带的潜在机制仍不清楚。在本研究中,我们利用降水(P)、温度(T)和标准化降水蒸散指数(SPEI)的数据,分析了不同植被类型和气候带的植被总初级生产力(GPP)对气候因子的响应及其累积效应。结果表明:(1)7 个气候带的 GPP 存在显著差异,其中第 VII 气候带最高,达到 1860.07 gC·m,第 I 气候带最低,为 126.03 gC·m。(2)GPP 与气候带 I、IV、V 和 VI 的温度呈显著正相关,与气候带 I、II 和 IV 的降水呈显著正相关。此外,气候带 I、II 和 IV 的 SPEI 与 GPP 之间存在显著正相关。(3)干旱对中国 45.10%地区的 GPP 产生了累积效应,平均累积持续时间为 5 个月。这些影响在 I、II 和 VII 区持续了 6-8 个月,在 III、IV 和 VI 区持续了 2-4 个月。在不同的植被类型中,森林经历了最长的 6 个月累积效应时间,其次是草地(5 个月)、耕地(4 个月)和灌丛(4 个月)。累积时间尺度随年 SPEI 的增加而减小。不同植被类型在不同气候带对干旱的响应和累积 GPP 的差异突显了植被-气候相互作用的复杂性。

相似文献

1
Exploring the comprehensive link between climatic factors and vegetation productivity in China.探讨中国气候因素与植被生产力的综合联系。
Int J Biometeorol. 2024 Dec;68(12):2579-2595. doi: 10.1007/s00484-024-02770-x. Epub 2024 Sep 5.
2
Revisiting the cumulative effects of drought on global gross primary productivity based on new long-term series data (1982-2018).基于新的长期序列数据(1982 - 2018年)重新审视干旱对全球总初级生产力的累积影响。
Glob Chang Biol. 2022 Jun;28(11):3620-3635. doi: 10.1111/gcb.16178. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
3
Investigation into the temporal impacts of drought on vegetation dynamics in China during 2000 to 2022.2000年至2022年中国干旱对植被动态的时间影响调查。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 21;15(1):6351. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-90692-y.
4
Effects and contributions of meteorological drought on agricultural drought under different climatic zones and vegetation types in Northwest China.不同气候区和植被类型下气象干旱对中国西北地区农业干旱的影响和贡献。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 May 15;821:153270. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153270. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
5
[Response of vegetation productivity to drought in the Qinling-Daba Mountains, China from 2001 to 2020].[2001年至2020年中国秦岭—大巴山地区植被生产力对干旱的响应]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2022 Aug;33(8):2105-2112. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202208.021.
6
Dynamic process of ecosystem water use efficiency and response to drought in the Yellow River Basin, China.中国黄河流域生态系统水分利用效率的动态过程及其对干旱的响应
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Jul 15;934:173339. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173339. Epub 2024 May 17.
7
Assessing the response of vegetation change to drought during 2009-2018 in Yunnan Province, China.评估 2009-2018 年期间中国云南省植被变化对干旱的响应。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Sep;28(34):47066-47082. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-13835-4. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
8
Response of forest photosynthesis to dry-wet change based on solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence over eastern monsoon China.基于太阳诱导叶绿素荧光的中国东部季风区森林光合作用对干湿变化的响应
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2024 Nov;35(11):3107-3118. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202411.024.
9
Satellite detection of cumulative and lagged effects of drought on autumn leaf senescence over the Northern Hemisphere.卫星探测北半球秋季叶片衰老对干旱的累积和滞后效应。
Glob Chang Biol. 2019 Jun;25(6):2174-2188. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14627. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
10
Effects of drought and climate factors on vegetation dynamics in Central Asia from 1982 to 2020.1982 年至 2020 年中亚干旱和气候因素对植被动态的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Feb 15;328:116997. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116997. Epub 2022 Dec 12.