Wang Yanshu, Qu Yali, Yang Chongtu, Wu Yuanan, Wei Hong, Qin Yun, Yang Jie, Zheng Tianying, Chen Jie, Cannella Roberto, Vernuccio Federica, Ronot Maxime, Chen Weixia, Song Bin, Jiang Hanyu
Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Department of Radiology, Functional and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Eur Radiol. 2025 Apr;35(4):1772-1784. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-11043-5. Epub 2024 Sep 5.
To develop an MRI-based score that enables individualized predictions of the survival benefit of wide over narrow resection margins.
This single-center retrospective study (December 2011 to May 2022) included consecutive patients who underwent curative-intent resection for single Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) 0/A HCC and preoperative contrast-enhanced MRI. In patients with narrow resection margins, preoperative demographic, laboratory, and MRI variables independently associated with early recurrence-free survival (RFS) were identified using Cox regression analyses, which were employed to develop a predictive score (named "MARGIN"). Survival outcomes were compared between wide and narrow resection margins in a propensity-score matched cohort for the score-stratified low- and high-risk groups, respectively.
Four hundred nineteen patients (median age, 54 years; 361 men) were included, 282 (67.3%) undergoing narrow resection margins. In patients with narrow resection margins, age, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) > 400 ng/mL, protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II (PIVKA-II) > 200 mAU/mL, radiological involvement of liver capsule, and infiltrative appearance were associated with early RFS (p values, 0.002-0.04) and formed the MARGIN score with a testing dataset C-index of 0.75 (95% CI: 0.65-0.84). In the matched cohort, wide resection margin was associated with improved early RFS rate for the high-risk group (MARGIN score ≥ - 1.3; 71.1% vs 41.0%; p = 0.02), but not for the low-risk group (MARGIN score < - 1.3; 79.7% vs 76.1%; p = 0.36).
In patients with single BCLC 0/A HCC, the MARGIN score may serve as promising decision-making to indicate the need for wide resection margins.
The MARGIN score has the potential to identify patients who would benefit more from wide resection margins than narrow resection margins, improving the postoperative survival of patients with single BCLC 0/A hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
Age, AFP, PIVKA-II, radiological involvement of liver capsule, and infiltrative appearance were associated with early RFS and formed the MARGIN score. The MARGIN score achieved a testing dataset C-index of 0.75. Wide resection margins were associated with improved early RFS for the high-risk group, but not for the low-risk group.
开发一种基于磁共振成像(MRI)的评分系统,以实现对宽切缘与窄切缘切除术后生存获益的个体化预测。
这项单中心回顾性研究(2011年12月至2022年5月)纳入了连续接受根治性切除的单发巴塞罗那临床肝癌(BCLC)0/A期肝细胞癌(HCC)患者以及术前行对比增强MRI检查的患者。在切缘窄的患者中,使用Cox回归分析确定与早期无复发生存期(RFS)独立相关的术前人口统计学、实验室和MRI变量,这些变量用于建立一个预测评分(命名为“MARGIN”)。在倾向评分匹配队列中,分别对评分分层的低风险和高风险组比较宽切缘和窄切缘的生存结局。
共纳入419例患者(中位年龄54岁;男性361例),其中282例(67.3%)切缘窄。在切缘窄的患者中,年龄、甲胎蛋白(AFP)>400 ng/mL、维生素K缺乏或拮抗剂-II诱导蛋白(PIVKA-II)>200 mAU/mL、肝包膜的影像学受累以及浸润性表现与早期RFS相关(p值为0.002 - 0.04),并形成了MARGIN评分,测试数据集的C指数为0.75(95%CI:0.65 - 0.84)。在匹配队列中,宽切缘与高风险组(MARGIN评分≥ - 1.3)的早期RFS率改善相关(71.1%对41.0%;p = 0.02),但与低风险组(MARGIN评分< - 1.3)无关(79.7%对76.1%;p = 0.36)。
在单发BCLC 0/A期HCC患者中,MARGIN评分可能是一个有前景的决策工具,用于指示是否需要宽切缘。
MARGIN评分有可能识别出从宽切缘切除比窄切缘切除中获益更多的患者,从而改善单发BCLC 0/A期肝细胞癌(HCC)患者的术后生存。
年龄、AFP、PIVKA-II、肝包膜的影像学受累以及浸润性表现与早期RFS相关,并形成了MARGIN评分。MARGIN评分在测试数据集的C指数为0.75。宽切缘与高风险组的早期RFS改善相关,但与低风险组无关。