Chicago Medical School, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, Illinois.
Harvey and Bernice Jones Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock.
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2024 Oct 1;142(10):926-933. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.3281.
Racial, ethnic, and sex disparities exist in US clinical study enrollment, and the prevalence of these disparities in Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group (PEDIG) clinical studies has not been thoroughly assessed.
To evaluate racial, ethnic, and sex representation in PEDIG clinical studies compared with the 2010 US Census pediatric population.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional analysis examined PEDIG clinical studies based in the US from December 1, 1997 to September 12, 2022, 41 of which met inclusion criteria of a completed study, a study population younger than 18 years, and 1 or more accompanying publication. Data analysis was performed between November 2023 and February 2024.
Study participant race, ethnicity, and sex for each clinical study, as collected from peer-reviewed publications, patient-enrollment datasets, and ClinicalTrials.gov.
Median enrollment percentages of female, White, Black, Hispanic, Asian, and other race participants were calculated and compared with the 2010 US Census pediatric population using a 1-sample Wilcoxon rank test. Proportionate enrollment was defined as no difference on a 1-sample Wilcoxon rank test if P ≥ .05. If P < .05, we determined if the median enrollment percentage was greater than or less than 2010 US Census proportion to determine if enrollees were underrepresented or overrepresented. To calculate the magnitude of overrepresentation or underrepresentation, enrollment-census difference (ECD) was defined as the difference between groups' median enrollment percentage and percentage representation in the 2010 US Census. Compound annual growth rate (CAGR) was used to measure temporal trends in enrollment, and logistic regression analysis was used to analyze factors that may have contributed to proportionate representation outcomes.
A total of 11 658 study participants in 41 clinical studies were included; mean (SD) participant age was 5.9 (2.8) years and 5918 study participants (50.8%) were female. In clinical studies meeting inclusion criteria, White participants were overrepresented (ECD, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.10-0.28; P < .001). Black participants (ECD, -0.07; 95% CI, -0.10 to -0.03; P < .001), Asian participants (ECD, -0.03; 95% CI, -0.04 to -0.02; P < .001), and Hispanic participants (ECD, -0.09; 95% CI, -0.13 to -0.05; P < .001) were underrepresented. Female participants were represented proportionately (ECD, 0.004; 95% CI, -0.036 to 0.045; P = .21). White and Asian participants demonstrated a decreasing trend in study enrollment from 1997 to 2022 (White: CAGR, -1.5%; 95% CI, -2.3% to -0.6%; Asian: CAGR, -1.7%; 95% CI, -2.0% to -1.4%), while Hispanic participants demonstrated an increasing enrollment trend (CAGR, 7.2%; 95% CI, 3.7%-10.7%).
In this retrospective cross-sectional study of PEDIG clinical studies from December 1, 1997 to September 12, 2022, Black, Hispanic, and Asian participants were underrepresented, White participants were overrepresented, and female participants were represented proportionally. Trends suggested increasing enrollment of Hispanic participants and decreasing enrollment of White participants over time. This study demonstrates an opportunity to advocate for increased enrollment of underrepresented groups in pediatric ophthalmology clinical studies.
在美国临床研究招募中存在种族、民族和性别差异,而这些差异在儿科眼病研究组(PEDIG)临床研究中的流行程度尚未得到彻底评估。
评估 PEDIG 临床研究中参与者的种族、民族和性别代表性,与 2010 年美国人口普查的儿科人群进行比较。
设计、地点和参与者:这项横断面分析检查了 1997 年 12 月 1 日至 2022 年 9 月 12 日期间在美国进行的 PEDIG 临床研究,其中 41 项符合纳入标准,即已完成研究、研究人群年龄小于 18 岁以及有 1 个或多个伴随出版物。数据分析于 2023 年 11 月至 2024 年 2 月进行。
从同行评议出版物、患者入组数据集和 ClinicalTrials.gov 中收集每个临床研究的参与者种族、民族和性别。
计算了女性、白人、黑人、西班牙裔、亚洲人和其他种族参与者的中位数入组百分比,并使用单样本 Wilcoxon 秩检验与 2010 年美国人口普查儿科人群进行比较。比例入组定义为如果 P≥.05,则单样本 Wilcoxon 秩检验无差异。如果 P<.05,则确定中位数入组百分比是否大于或小于 2010 年美国人口普查比例,以确定参与者是否代表性不足或代表性过高。为了计算代表性过高或过低的程度,定义了入组-普查差异(ECD),即两组中位数入组百分比与 2010 年美国人口普查中百分比的差异。使用复合年增长率(CAGR)来衡量入组的时间趋势,并使用逻辑回归分析来分析可能导致比例代表性结果的因素。
共纳入 41 项临床研究的 11658 名研究参与者;参与者的平均(SD)年龄为 5.9(2.8)岁,5918 名研究参与者(50.8%)为女性。在符合纳入标准的临床研究中,白人参与者代表性过高(ECD,0.19;95%CI,0.10-0.28;P<.001)。黑人参与者(ECD,-0.07;95%CI,-0.10 至-0.03;P<.001)、亚洲参与者(ECD,-0.03;95%CI,-0.04 至-0.02;P<.001)和西班牙裔参与者(ECD,-0.09;95%CI,-0.13 至-0.05;P<.001)代表性不足。女性参与者比例适中(ECD,0.004;95%CI,-0.036 至 0.045;P=.21)。从 1997 年到 2022 年,白人(CAGR,-1.5%;95%CI,-2.3% 至-0.6%)和亚洲(CAGR,-1.7%;95%CI,-2.0% 至-1.4%)参与者的研究入组呈下降趋势,而西班牙裔参与者的入组呈上升趋势(CAGR,7.2%;95%CI,3.7%-10.7%)。
在这项对 1997 年 12 月 1 日至 2022 年 9 月 12 日期间的 PEDIG 临床研究的回顾性横断面研究中,黑人、西班牙裔和亚洲参与者代表性不足,白人参与者代表性过高,女性参与者比例适中。趋势表明,西班牙裔参与者的入组人数不断增加,而白人参与者的入组人数不断减少。这项研究表明,有机会倡导在儿科眼科学临床研究中增加代表性不足的群体的参与。